Question of the day

Why did the NYT slash $116,000 off the normal rate of a full page ad for’s disgraceful ad which essentially called General Petraeus a traitor? Charles Hurt from the NY Post reports:

September 13, 2007 — WASHINGTON – The New York Times dramatically slashed its normal rates for a full-page advertisement for’s ad questioning the integrity of Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq.

Headlined “Cooking the Books for the White House,” the ad which ran in Monday’s Times says Petraeus is “a military man constantly at war with the facts” and concluded – even before he testified before Congress – that “General Petraeus is likely to become General Betray Us.”

According to Abbe Serphos, director of public relations for the Times, “the open rate for an ad of that size and type is $181,692.”

A spokesman for confirmed to The Post that the liberal activist group had paid only $65,000 for the ad – a reduction of more than $116,000 from the stated rate.

A Post reporter who called the Times advertising department yesterday without identifying himself was quoted a price of $167,000 for a full-page black-and-white ad on a Monday.

Serphos declined to confirm the price and refused to offer any inkling for why the paper would give such a discounted price.

Well, knowing the NYT, they probably felt bad about charging them the full rate, considering the editorial board normally approves of and runs hit pieces like that against the administration on a daily basis for free.

Contact the NYT and let them know what you think about this:

Phone: (212) 556-7652
Address: Public Editor
The New York Times
620 Eighth Avenue
New York, NY 10018

Comments are closed.