Gateway Pundit slams home a point I’ve had floating around in my mind the last several weeks (but haven’t articulated) with his post titled “How Democrats Lost Vietnam… And, How They Plan On Losing Iraq [1]“.
Cox and Forkum [2] say it another way:
On the issue of opposing additional troops and trying to show it by withholding funds for the war, John Dickerson at Slate [3] thinks that Senator Ted Kennedy is on his own in wanting to ‘stop the surge’ [4] via cutting off war funding. I think on that score, he’s incorrect [5] (more here [6]).
Correction: Dickerson points out in the comments section that he did note that Kennedy would probably have more allies in the House than Senate. My mistake (that’s what I get for speed reading!)
Hat tip: Good Lt at The Jawa Report [7]
Read more via: MKH [8], Blackfive [9], Dan Riehl [10], James Joyner [11], Decision ’08 [12], AJ Strata [13], Blue Crab Boulevard [14]