E-Mail 'Rice can't recall 7/10/01 meeting with Tenet and Black mentioned in Woodward's book' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'Rice can't recall 7/10/01 meeting with Tenet and Black mentioned in Woodward's book' to a friend

Loading ...

8 Responses to "Rice can’t recall 7/10/01 meeting with Tenet and Black mentioned in Woodward’s book"

Atlantic Review says:

October 2, 2006 at 5:41 pm

Iraq and Vietnam and the “State of Denial” and Krepinevich’s “oil-spot strategy”

Bob Woodward, who has been known for his incredible access to classified reports and close contacts to members of the Bush administration, has just published a new book State of Denial (Amazon.com, Amazon.de) and writes in the Washington Post article Secr
Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » The Mainstream Media Hubris of 60 Minutes says:

October 2, 2006 at 7:17 pm

[…] Sister Toldjah […]
Iowa Voice says:

October 2, 2006 at 8:53 pm

Rice Was Briefed

Being reported that Rice was briefed on July 10, 2001, about al Qaeda:

A review of White House records has determined that George J. Tenet, then the director of central intelligence, did brief Condoleezza Rice and other top officials on July 10, 2001,
stevesh says:

October 2, 2006 at 9:43 pm

McClatchy DC desk says Tenet showed the Commish’s the same briefing as Condi saw on July 10, 2001.

LINK
TruthInPol says:

October 2, 2006 at 11:34 pm

Veerrry interesting! Someone is lying. Either it’s the world’s most prestigious reporter, whose career and enormous reputation depend solely on his credibility (and BTW has always supported Bush), or it’s Condi. Now Condi, is NOT a kiss-ass toady. She’s NOT! I bet Rush and Tony Snow would back me up on that. Further, this administration is well known for it’s steadfast truthfulness and integrity – beginning with WMD’s. Sooo – who’s lying? It’s a puzzlement.
Derrick says:

October 3, 2006 at 1:11 am

TruthinPol,

Now its pretty obvious who was lying, and that was “Mushroom Cloud” Condi. I know that people like her cause she’s one of the few black members of the GOP, and she has a pretty good fashion sense (which of course is a necessity for SOS), but she’s proven to be utterly incompetent at her jobs. She couldn’t handle the infighting between Rummy and Powell, she shows no sense of urgency on anything including this pre-9/11 meeting and the Israel-Hezbelloh war, and she obviously hasn’t been usefull in dealing with Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea, the UN or Iran. She should have enjoyed the presidential speculation glow while it lasted, for I think ultimately she won’t look much better in hindsight than Rumsfeld.
Chris says:

October 3, 2006 at 10:58 am

“Incomprehensible”. That is a very interesting word choice. There are only a few people from the pre-9/11 world who realized what was comprehensible. They were, to name a few, Richard Clark, John O’Neill and Michael Scheuer.

Whether what was in motion was “comprehensible” to a new, novice NSA with an academic background in Cold War containment is a dubious assertion.
Big Bang Hunter says:

October 3, 2006 at 11:10 am

– My take. Massive Liberal MSM pushback, aggressively defending the “Clinton legacy”. 24/7 spin to deflect. Eve of a Congressional election you know, and the Dhimbulbs are so unsure of victory, they’re pulling out all the stops. It will be interesting to see if this approach actually dupes enough of the electorate that the Left can get away with no platform.

– Bang

Comments are closed.