24 – 10pm til 11pm open thread

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 8, 2010 at 8:17 pm

43 minutes til we can satisfy our respective Jack Bauer fixes for the week …

Jack Bauer

 

The “Green Police” ad

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 8, 2010 at 7:53 pm

If you’re like me, you got a bit of a kick out of watching the Audi “Green Police” ad during the Super Bowl last night. Here it is again for those of you who didn’t see it:

Reading some of the reactions to it today, though, I see that some people were freaked out about the ad, looking at it as a possible sign of things to come right here in the US. While I can certainly see where that concern comes from, considering the current administation’s ultra liberal agenda on all things “green,” at the same time I can’t help but think this ad did more harm than good to the “Green” movement. The cops arresting private citizens for non-issues like a too-warm hot tub and things of that nature just go to show how ridiculous the whole idea of “green punishment” actually is and I think there would be a major outcry here if anything like that ever happened here and was widely reported by the MSM (big IF there). On the flip side, though, is the issue of another type of “Green Police” punishment – the kind that will hit you right in the wallet:

The ad works for me far better as a warning of an overreaching government dictating choices — like incandescent lightbulbs, paper vs plastic in the grocery store, and choice of cars. Audi may convince some people to look into its clean-diesel offerings, but the ad itself is likely to elicit more concern over the direction of regulatory efforts, especially at the EPA, which declared carbon dioxide a dangerous pollutant last year and has started the effort to regulate manufacturing as a way to get around the legislative hurdles to cap-and-trade bills in Congress.

If the government really does intend on creating regulation over these kinds of choices, a “green police” will not be far behind, although not in the humorous style presented here. It will instead insert itself in home purchases, car choices, energy rationing, and in the use of private property. Government will pick the winners and losers rather than a free people making their own choices, and they will use the power of government to ensure that those winners prevail for the purposes of a governing elite.

Your thoughts?

———–

To see the other ads that ran during the SB, click here.

 

Breaking: Rep. John Murtha passes away

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 8, 2010 at 3:54 pm

Via WJAC:

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A spokesman said Democratic Rep. John P. Murtha died Monday at 1:18 p.m. at Virginia Hospital Center in Arlington, Va.

Murtha had been suffering complications from gallbladder surgery. At his bedside was his family.

Murtha, 77, was chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense.

The 19-term Democrat was the first Vietnam veteran to serve in Congress. He most recently led the House Appropriations subcommittee on defense spending.

Murtha was a representative for Pennsylvania’s 12th Congressional District since 1974. This past Saturday, Murtha became Pennsylvania’s longest serving member of Congress.

Murtha was a retired Marine Corps officer and the first combat veteran of the Vietnam War elected to Congress.

The AP, surprisingly, has a pretty detailed description of Murtha’s political life in Congress, including his ethical scandals, unfair Haditha accusations and the fact that he was a master ‘bring home the bacon’ politico for his state. WaPo’s The Fix blog has a write-up on what will happen with Murtha’s seat going forward:

According to state law, the governor has ten days once the vacancy is officially declared to decide on the date for the special election, which can come no sooner than 60 days following that proclamation.

That likely means the special election will be held on May 18, which is the date already set for federal primaries around the state. (Special elections costs the state huge sums of money and it’s likely that Gov. Ed Rendell will choose to go with an already established election day to save some cash.)

I’ll reserve any political commentary I have about Murtha for another day. May he RIP, and his family and friends find comfort and peace in their memories of him.

 

Palin strikes back at handnote handwringers

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 8, 2010 at 12:14 pm

Jim Hoft reports:

RIGHT ON— On Sunday the left went bonkers after they discovered that the TelePrompter-less former Governor Sarah Palin wrote notes on the palm of her left hand for her speech to the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville. The far left absolutely freaked over this non-issue rather than focus on her brilliant speech knocking the Obama Administration’s horrid record on economics and national defense.

Today Sarah fired back…

How? During a campaign stop for TX Governor Rick Perry, she wrote “Hi Mom!” on her hand – and made sure it was visible for photographs :D

Palin at Rick Perry campaign stop

"Hi Mom!"

Hehe – and nope, it’s not a Photoshopped picture. You can view more pix of her “Hi Mom!” hand at Jim’s site.

I’m sure Andrew Sullivan’s head is spinning right about now, alongside the HuffPo types at the HuffPo site itself and in the MSM ;)

Related Reading:

 

Obama theater will come alive during “bipartisan” healthcare reform “summit”

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 8, 2010 at 9:08 am

The MSM, practically drowning in their own saliva, are tripping over themselves to report how Obama will soon convene a “healthcare summit” which involves himself and Democrat and Republican leaders. Via Politico:

President Barack Obama is planning to host a televised meeting with Republican and Democratic congressional leaders on health care reform.

The Feb. 25 meeting is an attempt to reach across the aisle but not a signal that the president plans to start over, as Republicans have demanded, a White House official said.

“I want to come back [after the Presidents Day congressional recess] and have a large meeting — Republicans and Democrats — to go through, systematically, all the best ideas that are out there and move it forward,” Obama said in an interview with Katie Couric during CBS’s Super Bowl pre-game show Sunday.

Obama said he wants to “look at the Republican ideas that are out there.”

“If we can go, step by step, through a series of these issues and arrive at some agreements, then, procedurally, there’s no reason why we can’t do it a lot faster the process took last year,” he said.

In a statement, the official said, “What the president will not do is let this moment slip away. He hopes to have Republican support in doing so — but he is going to move forward on health reform.”

[...]

But since the Democratic loss in the Massachusetts Senate race, Obama has been forced to rework his legislative strategy – both by striking a more bipartisan tone, and returning to his campaign pledge of providing more transparency. He’s been dogged by questions about why he failed to live up to his campaign promise of televising the health care negotiations on C-SPAN.

The half-day meeting will take place at Blair House, and be broadcast live, presumably by C-SPAN, making it the first televised White House meeting involving the president since a forum last March.

This is a joke. He’s had plenty of time over the last year to look over GOP ideas on heatlhcare reform but instead has taken every opportunity he can to lie about those ideas, suggesting that the GOP had no ideas, no plans, effectively painting them as not just the party of no ideas … but the party of “no.” His desire to host a broadcast of a “meeting of the Democrat and Republican minds” is just one more example of his penchant for exhibiting style and symbolism over substance. Sure, he promised during the campaign numerous times that he would open up healthcare reform negotiations on C-SPAN – but he didn’t say he was going to be a part of it. This “summit” would be better … but not much … if he kept his hands – and ego – out of it. His participation in the summit is designed solely to look like he genuinely “cares” about what the GOP thinks, and that he is “listening” to the American people on the issue, when in reality he doesn’t care what either thinks, and has said as much with his comments about him being content with being a one-term President as long as he can get his reform plan passed – in part by engaging in the same types of backroom deal-making (more here) he decried as a candidate for President, and as President.

The GOP, of course, has no choice but to go along with this latest farce, as calling it for what it is – nothing more than a “show summit” a la the “Beer Summit” – will make them look flip-floppy in the face of their constant complaints over the last couple of months about the lack of open, televised-on-CSPAN negotiations. So Obama will get to do what he does best: stand in front of a camera and deliver meaningless, empty rhetoric to his adoring masses in the MSM, which will translate into breathless, fluffy “commentary” on news program after news program about how this President has “recommitted” himself to the process of “transparency” and “open government” and “bipartisanship.”

Whether or not this transparently smoke and mirrors political move is smart politics by the WH will be decided at the ballot box come November. Let’s hope and pray that the GOP is aware of this and is able to utilize the “summit” broadcast to their advantage.

 

David Paterson to resign soon over alleged “new scandal”?

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 7, 2010 at 7:23 pm

Take this story with a grain of salt, but if true, it would be unprecedented to have two Governors of the same state resign over a sex scandal within a matter of a couple of years.

Stay tuned …

 

Saints vs. Colts: Super Bowl Sunday Open Thread (UPDATE 2: SAINTS WIN 31-17)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 7, 2010 at 12:18 pm

Colts vs. Saints

In the battle for the biggest prize in football, who will reign supreme? (Photo courtesy of NFL.com)

Time to get in your last-minute predictions as to what will happen and who will win in tonight’s much-hyped match-up between the Indianapolis Colts and the New Orleans Saints in Super Bowl 44, being played at Sun Life Stadium in Miami Gardens, FL. Indy is favored to win today, while the Saints are the obvious “sentimental favorite” since they’ve never been to a Super Bowl, and of course, considering what New Orleans has been through since Hurricane Katrina. I’m inclined to root for the Saints on that basis, in spite of the fact that they are a division rival of the Panthers, and in spite of the fact that I think Peyton Manning is adorable. :D

Game time is 6 PM ET and it will be broadcast on CBS.

And don’t forget to be on the lookout for the Tim Tebow ad … sure to make many a raging liberal “feminist’s” head do a complete rotation around their neck a la Linda Blair in The Excorcist. ;)

Update – 6:38 PM: There are apparently going to be two Tebow ads tonight. The first one (below) has already run (pre-game), with the second – supposedly more “controversial” one to air later tonight (via Ed Morrissey).

How offensive and eeeeevil!

Read/watch more of the Tebow story here.

Update 2 – 9:46 PM: Saints win! They dominated the second half, and came out on top 31-17.

 

Sarah Palin’s Tea Party Convention speech (UPDATE: FNS INTERVIEW VIDEO ADDED)

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 7, 2010 at 11:12 am

The highlight of the first-ever Tea Party convention this weekend was the keynote speech delivered by former Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin.

You can watch the Full video of her speech, including the Q&A that took place after it, below:

Jim Hoft, PJM, and Founding Bloggers have some great Palin photos from the convention.

As expected there are a lot of write-ups of both Palin’s speech and the convention on the whole from the right, left, and the MSM. Probably the most humorous – and predictable – series of posts comes from a couple of “writers” at both the HuffPo and Think Progress blogs, who pointed out that Palin had a few words jotted down on her hand during the Q&A. MSDNC, of course, is making that a focal point of Palin’s appearance as I write this. Well, all I can say to that is at least it wasn’t a teleprompter she was reading off of …

She also sat down Saturday during the convention for an interview with Fox News’ Judson Berger. You can read the transcript of the interview – in which she doesn’t rule out a possible 2012 Presidential run – here. Berger’s write-up of the interview is here. She also did another interview with Fox’s Chris Wallace, which will air on Fox News Sunday at 2 PM ET. The transcript from that interview can be read here.

Update – 11:39: Here’s what looks to be the full video – in several parts – of the Chris Wallace interview with Palin (via Conservative New Media).

 

Egomaniac sez: “She insisted she’s going to be buried in an Obama t-shirt”

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 6, 2010 at 10:39 am

Our humble President strikes again:

Yes, those are the words of the president, last night at the Democratic National Committee fundraiser in Washington. After listing his administration’s accomplishments and vowing that “our most urgent task is job creation,” Obama pledged to keep fighting for a national health care system. “We knew this was hard,” Obama said. And then he described a letter he received from a campaign worker who suffered from breast cancer and has since died:

“I got a letter — I got a note today from one of my staff — they forwarded it to me — from a woman in St. Louis who had been part of our campaign, very active, who had passed away from breast cancer. She didn’t have insurance. She couldn’t afford it, so she had put off having the kind of exams that she needed. And she had fought a tough battle for four years. All through the campaign she was fighting it, but finally she succumbed to it. And she insisted she’s going to be buried in an Obama t-shirt.”

Many observers have noted that the president often seems extraordinarily self-referential. It’s all about him, they say. But even those critics might be a little taken aback by the “buried in an Obama t-shirt” remark. Is it really that much about him?

I assume that was a rhetorical question.

Beyond our celebrity President’s now-legendary penchant for casting himself in the most dazzling of lights is the disturbing trend of trying to sell his healthcare “reform” package on the backs of the deceased. First it was the story of his mother’s passing from cancer, a story he told repeatedly on the campaign trail and beyond, in an effort to stir up support for passing healthcare “reform.” Next, it was during the immediate aftermath of Ted Kennedy’s death, where left wing pundits, the MSM, and Congressional Democrats were all crying out to pass the current healthcare reform bill “for Teddy!!!” Even at Ted Kennedy’s funeral, one of his grandsons was shamelessly used by the family during the “Prayers of the Faithful” segment to call for passing healthcare “reform” in his grandfather’s name. And now we have the story of the unnamed Obama activist who died from breast cancer because she couldn’t afford healthcare insurance, and who wanted to be buried wearing an Obama T-shirt.

Can’t this President, this party, sell this monstrosity of a bill without using the dead as political props in vain attempts to persuade people on an emotional basis rather than a substantive one? Apparently not, which may explain why his – their – “signature issue” is, well, close to being dead itself. Thankfully, for the sake of the republic, not many are buying the President’s empty rhetoric on “reform” anymore. It’s not about this President’s needs; it’s about the needs of the people. Which is as it should be.

So now, for Democrats, it’s on to Plan B – which is … ?

 

The joke’s on you, Patrick Kennedy

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 5, 2010 at 3:43 pm

Such sour grapes:

Sen. Scott Brown’s (R-Mass.) election has been shown to be “a joke,” the son of the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) said Thursday.

Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.) castigated Brown for having pushed to be sworn in ahead of schedule to permanently fill the Senate seat left vacant by the congressman’s father’s death in August.

“Brown’s whole candidacy was shown to be a joke today when he was sworn in early in order to cast his first vote as an objection to Obama’s appointment to the NLRB,” Kennedy said Thursday.

Kennedy was referencing some Democrats’ thoughts that Brown tried to bump up his swearing-in in order to give Republicans 41 votes, enough to filibuster the nomination of Craig Becker, a controversial nominee to join the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).

“Seven out of ten of Brown’s voters were labor households and he stressed that he was independent and while he was originally scheduled to be sworn in next week, they moved it up to today so he could cast his first vote, the most anti-labor, the most anti-what his constituents thought they were voting for when they voted for him,” Kennedy said.

[...]

“This is where he shows that when they need him, he’s in the tank for the Republicans,” Kennedy said.

LOL. So just because he campaigned as an “indepedent” Republican means he’s not ever supposed to, you know, vote with Republicans every once in a while? Memo to Patrick Kennedy: Just because a Republican won the “Kennedy seat” doesn’t mean he’s supposed to, um, vote in lockstep with him.

As I said above, this is little more than sour grapes coming from a guy who can’t believe Republicans outfoxed the Kennedys in MA to win the seat formerly held by his dad. Not only that, but really – that Kennedy would call Brown someone who is “in the tank for Republicans” sounds strange coming from someone who is clearly in the tank with hardcore Democrats and their agenda, if you consider his 84% liberal rating and how reliable a vote he is for liberal special interests. Not to mention that he is, well, he’s a Kennedy – so of course he’s going to be a diehard liberal.

Who was that he was calling “in the tank” again?

BTW, Rep. Kennedy may be facing his own Scott Brown soon, if polls on him in RI are any indication (via Jim Hoft).