E-Mail 'No, I don't want snarky post-Palin speech journalists "fired"' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'No, I don't want snarky post-Palin speech journalists "fired"' to a friend

Loading ...

13 Responses to "No, I don’t want snarky post-Palin speech journalists “fired”"

Betty Ann says:

June 29, 2010 at 1:59 am

Agree, “outing” the journalists isn’t necessary. So long as it taints them all.

Everything the press reports must be taken with a healthy dose of scepticism, even Fox.
Daniel Impalen says:

June 29, 2010 at 2:50 am

If it walks, talks, and acts like a duck then clearly it is a duck. Clearly the greater message here is that Sarah Palin’s intellect, credibility, articulating skill, media savvyness, material, and rhetoric fail to measure up to the seasoned politician speaker fees she charges. Stop illluding the facts.
Kate says:

June 29, 2010 at 8:12 am

So in your grand scheme of things Danny boy the press is right to denigrate and malign as long as they don’t get caught, right? They don’t have to present salient facts to back up their premises? They don’t have to do the careful background information and present information for the reader to make a sound opinion…they are the arbiters of what gets reported and how it is to be assimilated by the masses? Sounds a bit like Pravda to me. The liberal press used to be a cynical, now it’s become maniacal. The want to take down anyone who gets in the way of their leftist agenda. Beware what you read..NYT has already been caught is more lies than I can ever remember and their reports are not beneath twisting facts.

The fact that Sarah Parlin was at the university to raise money…and set a record I believe, was overlooked by the louts who were badmouthing Sarah…ouch. I don’t see them badmouthing Whoopi Goldberg when she gives a speech on campus…what degree does she have?
Frumious Bandersnatch says:

June 29, 2010 at 9:40 am

The irony of slamming Palin while using a nonsense word such as “illuding” when it is more apropos to use “eliding” (although, I’d like to know what, exactly, was elided) probably escapes those who don’t have the intellectual heft of a dougnut.
Brian72 says:

June 29, 2010 at 10:00 am

Daniel, if what you say is true, then the market would not bear the fees. It clearly does all over the country, so you are wrong.

You are also wrong in that Palin has representation from the Washington Speaker’s Bureau, and they negotiate the contracts and fees, not her.

If she were such an obvious failure at all the things you insist, then they would not bother, yet they do. She can draw several hundred to a fundraiser banquet at hundreds per head, and she can draw several thousand to an arena, as she has done many times over, and will continue to do.

She is a force in our nation today, and just because you don’t like it doesn’t make it not true.
suze says:

June 29, 2010 at 10:11 am

Haha Danny! You ARE ignorant. The story about the snarking support no such conclusion; it merely shows that the journalists BELIEVE your assertion so much that they cannot possibly report truthfully.

In fact, what it also reveals is the journalist’s own ignorance (“I didn’t understand her speech at all!”, one says….incredible. it wasn’t THAT complicated people) and their inability to objectively hear words and report.

But thanks, Danny, for the confirmation!
Brian72 says:

June 29, 2010 at 10:12 am

I’m a first time visitor by the way, and I think this is a nice looking blog.

You are hearby bookmarked.

I shall return!
Swibbie says:

June 29, 2010 at 10:28 am

I always like to read Sarah Palin links because in the comment section there is always some Palin haters who whine, bitch, and moan about her intellect and speaking fees. True to form, Daniel does not disappoint. Of course this person clearly doesn’t have a clue what “illuding” means, but somehow in his tiny little world he thinks he is qualified to judge people on their intellect. It is sometimes laughable, but always pathetic.

Not to mention VERY entertaining.
bill glass says:

June 29, 2010 at 11:25 am

I say FIRE ‘EM ALL !!
Carlos says:

June 29, 2010 at 12:39 pm

Beautiful catch, Frumious.

I’m sure Daniel knows in his own mind he is absolutely correct because, amongst all his intellectual friends there’s not one that disagrees with what he says. It’s only out here in the extremely vapid intellectual hinterlands one could possibly believe Sarah might have something useful to say.

Says a lot about your intellectual capacity (or incapacity, as the case may be), Daniel.
Carlton West says:

June 29, 2010 at 1:20 pm

Gov. Sarah Palin provides the lamestream press and its Orwellian-sheep followers their daily two-minutes hate. Old news. The new news is: She will speak in Atlanta tonight for the benefit of special needs children. No controversy, no politics.
Carlos says:

June 29, 2010 at 5:53 pm

And, I imagine, no speaking fees? Good on her if she’s there gratis.
Kate says:

June 29, 2010 at 6:37 pm

The fly in the liberal ointment is that they don’t have as stellar a speaker to counter Sarah’s current popularity. Any idea who gets the most money to speak in front of liberal audiences?

Heavens above, if they are so worried about speaker fees, why are there agencies that provide keynote speakers for a fee? I guess, that just too free enterprise for them!!! Any one wanna bet they are lawyers, too????

Comments are closed.