You know the Ground Zero mosque is a bad idea…

Posted by: Phineas on August 19, 2010 at 1:00 pm

…When even Muslims oppose it and call the rationale behind it “bunk.” Here’s a round up of recent opinions; some may surprise you:

From the Director-General of al-Arabiya TV, via MEMRI:

“The [Ground Zero] mosque… is a strange affair, because it is not an issue [that concerns] the Muslims. [In fact,] we never even heard of it until it became the focus of vociferous arguments between supporters and objectors, most of them non-Muslim Americans!…

“The Muslims never asked for this [mosque], and even the angry Muslims do not want it. This is one of the few times when the two opposing sides are in agreement. Nevertheless, the dispute flared up. It made the front pages of newspapers and [featured on] the major television programs. Demonstrations were held in the streets, and large posters were plastered on New York buses, demanding that the construction of the mosque be prevented and reminding everyone of the 9/11 crime. This really is a strange battle!

“I can’t imagine that Muslims [actually] want a mosque at this particular location, because it will become an arena for the promoters of hatred, and a monument to those who committed the crime. Moreover, there are no practicing Muslims in the area who need a place to worship, because it is a commercial district. Is there anyone who is [really] eager [to build] this mosque?…

I think that’s a point that all too few have considered: regardless of the intentions of the builders of the mosque, it will without doubt become a shrine for jihadists.

Next, from two Canadian Muslims who call the Ground Zero mosque a deliberate provocation:

New York currently boasts at least 30 mosques so it’s not as if there is pressing need to find space for worshippers. The fact we Muslims know the idea behind the Ground Zero mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation to thumb our noses at the infidel. The proposal has been made in bad faith and in Islamic parlance, such an act is referred to as “Fitna,” meaning “mischief-making” that is clearly forbidden in the Koran.

The Koran commands Muslims to, “Be considerate when you debate with the People of the Book” — i.e., Jews and Christians. Building an exclusive place of worship for Muslims at the place where Muslims killed thousands of New Yorkers is not being considerate or sensitive, it is undoubtedly an act of “fitna”

In America, Dr. Zuhdi Jasser, head of a genuinely moderate Muslim group, is concerned that the mosque will only offer misguidance for the US Muslim community:

AIFD’s slogan is that its members are “Americans who happen to be Muslim, and not Muslims who demand to be American.” As a devout Muslim, Dr. Jasser has voiced strong opposition to the mosque now called “Park 51” that threatens to encroach on Ground Zero. When he first heard of the plans, he says, he wrote an op-ed for the New York Post detailing why he as a Muslim felt a mosque in such a location would only offer more misguidance for the U.S. Muslim community.

“The reality is that many of us have never said their rights should be infringed in any way but rather that we pray that a light will finally go on in their heads which tells them that ‘this ostentatious $100 million Islamic center should be built elsewhere and not in a place that casts a shadow upon the graves of thousands of Americans’ — still an open raw wound for most Americans,” Dr. Jasser explains.

Jasser also expresses deep concern that the organization funding the mosque, led by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, has refused to exclude foreign funding from filling its coffers. Such financial transactions immediately offer the opportunity for foreign Islamists and their sympathizers to preach their version of political Islam and sharia, he warns, and present a very significant threat to national security.

“I cannot see genuine Muslim reform happening on the dime of foreign Islamist interests,” Jasser says. “Make no mistake, this Islamic center is not a spiritual statement but a global political one in the name of Islam. … Every group I have been directly involved with in building mosques and Islamic projects in the U.S. have rejected foreign funds entirely because of the ideological hypocrisies and Islamism that comes with them.”

Be sure to read Dr. Jasser’s moving essay at the New York Post link, above.

Finally, what does it say when the building of the mosque is opposed even by the scholars of Al-Azhar, the most highly regarded center of learning in the Sunni Islamic world?

A number of Al Azhar ulema expressed their opposition to building a mosque near [where] the events of September 11 [occurred], convinced that it is “a conspiracy to confirm a clear connection between the strikes of September [11] and Islam.” Dr. ‘Abd al-Mu‘ti Bayumi, a member of the Islamic Research Academy [of Al Azhar] told Al Masry Al Youm that he rejects the building of any mosque in this area [Ground Zero], because the “devious mentality” desires to connect these events [of 9/11] with Islam, though he maintains that Islam is innocent of this accusation. Instead, it is a “Zionist conspiracy,” which many are making use of to harm the religion. Likewise, Dr. Amna Nazir, professor of doctrine and philosophy at Al Azhar, expressed her rejection that a mosque be built near the World Trade Center, saying: “Building a mosque on this rubble indicates bad intention — even if we wished to shut our eyes, close our minds, and insist on good will. I hope it is a sincere step, and not a new conspiracy against Islam and Muslims.”

True, they can’t resist falling for the siren’s song of the antisemitism and victimhood that is wired so deeply into the core of Islam, but this is nonetheless a very significant event: for these men to tell Imam Rauf that his project shouldn’t go forward is similar to a Catholic council of bishops telling a parish priest to “knock it off.” Their statement carries weight. And be sure to read the rest of Raymond Ibrahim’s interesting article.

I guess Nancy Pelosi will want these people investigated, too.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

Edit: Forgot a link…

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

7 Responses to “You know the Ground Zero mosque is a bad idea…”

Comments

  1. Carlos says:

    “Fitna,” huh? What a wonderful word. I’m gonna have to remember that one.

    Even the more sensible voices of that socio-economic system recognize the purpose behind the “victory mosque.”

    And Nazi Pelousy needs to be thoroughly investigated for where all of her money comes from, including the real philosophical and criminal backgrounds of those who donate to her and her campaigns, with all the layers of obfuscation ripped away.

  2. nina says:

    Remember there is no such thing as a moderate muslim. Their religion calls for elimination of ALL infidels. That’s u and me. What you are reading in this statements is a pure distraction while they continue to build more mosques and bring more islamists to our country. Take a look at Europe where they have infiltrated most of the capitals ,formed hoods,established radical mosques and are demanding the implementation of sharia law. Time to wake up.:-w

  3. nina is right. Let’s not fall for the smokescreen. Their (Muslims who oppose the mosque) real worry is that the backlash that will result from the building of the Ground Zero mosque will interfere with the image of Islam and consequently the spread of Islam. So radical Islam is having a disagreement among themselves as to how to proceed in America. One thing seems for sure though, that this mosque if built, no matter what they name it, will forever be known in America as the Ground Zero Mosque. In fact this particular mosque, even if they move it, built by these developers, may still end up being known as The Ground Zero Mosque. So thanks to Pamela Geller and everyone who has opposed the mosque, it may turn out to be a win-win situation for America. Because of the mosque controversy we’ve learned a lot about radical Islam and the threat it poses to our American way of life.

  4. Jo says:

    I hope the Demtards like living under Shiria Law as they are so concerned for the Muslim’s ‘freedoms of religion’ but so radically opposed to freedom of Christian religion. Ironic that they won’t be able to spout their views under Shiria Law which they so seem to crave with their pushing the Muslim agenda–and it seems to start at the top with our own Mullah Hussein Obama. But that’s just me.