The Democratic Party’s Chairman is a race-baiting idiot

Posted by: Phineas on June 6, 2011 at 3:01 pm

**Posted by Phineas

That would be Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, who, only recently appointed to her post, is already gaining a reputation for astoundingly dumb gaffes.

The latest one is a real doozy, however:

[I]f you go back to the year 2000, when we had an obvious disaster and – and saw that our voting process needed refinement, and we did that in the America Votes Act and made sure that we could iron out those kinks, now you have the Republicans, who want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws and literally – and very transparently – block access to the polls to voters who are more likely to vote Democratic candidates than Republican candidates. And it’s nothing short of that blatant.

And Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is nothing short of a hyper-partisan nitwit (1).

Let me give you a little history lesson about your own party, Deb:

  • Q. Which party defended slavery? A. The Democratic Party.
  • Q. Which party opposed slavery? A. The Republican Party.
  • Q. Between 1875 and 1964, which party passed every major civil rights bill until the 1964 act? A. The Republicans.
  • Q. Which party created and defended Jim Crow for over 90 years? A. The Democrats.
  • Q. Which party fought every anti-lynching law introduced between the Civil War and 1964? A. The Democrats.
  • Q. Which party introduced segregation into the federal government? A. The Democrats, under Wilson.

You get the picture, Representative Wasserman-Schultz? Not only is your assertion a bald-faced lie, not only is it a contemptible slander against Republicans in general and in particular against anyone concerned about the integrity of our elections, not only is it a loathsome form of race-baiting intended to play Blacks for suckers, but it is also something that should never, ever be uttered by any Democrat, given your party’s dirty history on race.

But thanks, Debbie, for letting us know just how frightened the Democratic Party is of having to run on its miserable economic and political record of the last two years. I understand, even, maybe, sympathize (2) with your dilemma, because, without race-baiting and scare-mongering… you’ve got nothing.

See ya in November, 2012, Deb!

(1) Not exactly the words I used when I first read this, but then, this is a family show.

(2) Nah.

via Stephen Green

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

16 Responses to “The Democratic Party’s Chairman is a race-baiting idiot”

Comments

  1. Coastal Eddie says:

    The Dhimmocretin Potty’s Chairman…
    Is a real crock of Schultz.

    all words rated G

  2. Moira says:

    Game, set and match…to Phineas! haha Wasserman-Schultz is the gaffetastic gift to the GOP that keeps on giving! But has she sexted with The Weiner yet? lol

  3. Carlos says:

    Even with race-baiting and scare-mongering, she isn’t worth the pus in a pimple. It’s no wonder the jackasses put her in, because neither are they.

    And the really sad thing is, her gaffes aren’t nearly as stupid as Slo Joe’s!

  4. bear1909 says:

    The Dhimmis must be approaching the bottom of the barrel if this is the only person they could find to take them into a presidential election year.

    Is there any room on the Code Pinko Flotilla Boat? Jump on there, Debber-een-a. ROFLMAO

    And who did the Dhimmis have out at the polls intimidating white voters during President Real Boy’s run for the clover in 2008? DOH! The New Black Panther Party …. DOUBLE DOH!!!!

  5. Iva Biggin says:

    “The Democratic Party’s Chairman is a _____ idiot”. Fill in the blank with any negative adjective (or expletive) you desire. Or leave it blank. It all works.

  6. Vince says:

    My grandad told me 50 years ago; The last pickle in the barrel is the sourest.
    The Demidots have finally reached the bottom of the barrel. (or have they?)

  7. George in AZ says:

    A higher percentage of Rep congressmen/senators voted for the 1964 civil rights legislation than did Dems. LBJ observed that the law couldn’t be passed without Rep support.

  8. RM says:

    As we observe the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, we need to educate the public about the character of the political parties and figures of that era.

  9. Kate says:

    I couldn’t agree more with you RM…education, something about rewriting the history books to make dimocrats look better.

    I used to believe the fairy tale that the democrats were the force behind the civil rights struggles in the 60′s….boy was I surprised and angry when I finally did my reading and found out who was on the “wrong” side of the issues for decades!

    Can you change a leopards spots? Can you teach a shark to be a vegan? Can you teach a democrat to pick up a history book?

  10. Carlos says:

    A better question, Kate: Can you teach a jackass to be honest?

  11. Kate says:

    Unfortunately, a question that a lot of people would like to ignore as they reelect democrats over and over!

  12. Tex says:

    So she is accusing Republicans of trying to block voters who are more likely to vote Democrat from getting to the polls? She seems to have conveniently forgotten the Democrats on-going attempts to grant nearly immediate citizenship, and therefore voting rights, to anywhere between 15 million to 30 million illegal immigrants, mostly from Mexico and Latin America, who according to demographics, most likely will vote Democrat, thereby ensuring the Democrats a monopoly of power for many generations to come. Talk about hypocrisy!

  13. tommy mc donnell says:

    these phoney charges are to keep republicans on the defensive and divert attention away from the diasterous policies of the democratic party. ignore these baseless charges, everyone knows that the racists in america are the liberals.

  14. Carlos says:

    The jackasses wish to confer immediate citizenship on somewhere between 10M – 30M criminals just because they believe it’s the “right thing to do.”

    The fact that nearly 95% of those criminals would vote Democrap has nothing to do with it, Tex, or that they wouldn’t mind unionizing everything isn’t even a consideration.

    And if you believe that, I’ve got some great beachfront property with an ocean view just north of Las Vegas, bud, real cheap!

  15. captaingrumpy says:

    PLEASE..Everyone must start calling her

    SERGEANT SHULTZ

    It is a must, and it clearly tells you about her character. Thankyou

  16. Jojo says:

    Did she have to take a drug test before she got her job? She is clearly delusional. I’ll bet she thinks that greasy hair of hers is HOT. Bet Weiner thinks so too.