Pat Condell: name the poison

Posted by: Phineas on June 26, 2011 at 8:04 pm

**Posted by Phineas

Pat Condell returns and opens this video with a correction: When he mentioned in an earlier video that news from Norway had shown that 100% of the rapes in Oslo over the last five years had been committed by Muslims, he failed to distinguish between date-rape and marital rape on the one hand, and violent assault on the streets on the other. It’s this latter category that apparently is the special province of Muslims in Norway.

Having confessed that error, Condell takes out a rhetorical baseball bat and uses it to beat Islam and its Leftist apologists for the misogyny and mistreatment of women that forms a key pillar of the faith. He’s in fine form:

Condell touches on one point that’s crucial to understand a woman’s burden under Islam and Sharia: the woman must remain clothed and veiled with only the barest features showing, if at all, because the mere sight of her flesh might drive a man into uncontrollable lust. In other words, the woman is made responsible for the the man’s sexual misbehavior. One Islamic cleric infamously compared this to leaving uncovered meat out for the cat — what else could the cat do in that case, but take it?

Good Muslim women who follow the rules are inviolable, but if she breaks the rules, then she is guilty of adultery and punished — in some case by whipping. Unless, of course she can produce four male witnesses to say it was really rape, but, um… As Condell points out, who other than the rapists are likely to be witnesses?

And non-Muslim women? Whores by definition for going about uncovered and, by Muhammad’s own example, they are prizes of jihad.

Just ask the women of Oslo.

RELATED: Earlier posts on Islamic misogyny, and an article by Robert Spencer on the rape jihad.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

8 Responses to “Pat Condell: name the poison”


  1. Carlos says:

    It’s a wonderful thing to behold the storm troopers of NOW either being complicitly silent about the less-than-animal status of women in muslim societies, or the outright self-hate in support of muslim societies.

    And they don’t even bat an eye in their confusion.

    But don’t let me put a fly in their hate and fear of Christianity, because after all, Christians are the ones who want to set up misogynistic theocracies. Right?

  2. Phineas says:


    Few things show the utter moral bankruptcy of Western feminists more than their silence in the face of how women are treated in Sharia societies.

  3. Marshall Art says:

    Haven’t been a regular visitor lately, so I don’t know how often you’ve posted vids by this guy. The West needs more such messages and admonitions, not only about this particular subject, but about a whole host of issues that reflect the slide toward the abyss of our culture. Honesty and truth cannot be shouted loudly enough or too often.

    And I “third” the sentiment regarding the hypocrisy and cowardice of the radical leftist feminist movement in their silence on this issue. Shameful.

  4. Drew the Infidel says:

    What can you say about a bunch of idiots who riot and murder over cartoons?

  5. Paul says:

    Condell is right own !

  6. Jim McDonald says:

    This guy should be PM of England!

  7. bill glass says:

    What the Muzzies say seems to make perfect sense “to them”. The west is doomed and ideological leftist elites will be first in line to get their throats cut.

  8. captaingrumpy says:

    I have always tried to get more power to the poor women of the middle East,if only by encouragement. I think that the women’s movement in the west is purely political and if they actually cared about other women ,they would invite more to their parties. How can you be head of a free women movement,and not invite so and so because she’s not in the click.That is what our women are like.Who harasses more women in the workplace…..other women.