Interior Department destroys 100-year old small business

Posted by: Phineas on November 30, 2012 at 1:01 pm

**Posted by Phineas

Because, y’know, we must all sacrifice for Gaia (1). Mary Katherine Ham summarizes at Hot Air:

It’s just a 100-year-old company and California’s only surviving cannery, a sustainable, family-owned operation employing 30 people. The Drakes Bay Oyster Company has been in a seven-year fight with the federal government and environmental groups over whether it’s 40-year lease would be renewed this week. The Lunny family, which owns the oyster farm, was among a group of families that sold their ranch lands to the National Parks Service in the 1970s to protect them from developers, with the understanding they would get 40-year-leases renewed in perpetuity. After buying and operating the oyster farm without incident— they were even featured as outstanding environmental stewards by the National Parks Service— the Lunnys learned in 2005 they were accused of bringing environmental damage to an area the NPS and environmentalists were anxious to designate as the nation’s first federally recognized marine wilderness.

And thus Secretary Salazar has decided to shut down a farm that accounts for 40% of the oyster harvest in California, in violation of the original lease agreement and on the basis of  “science” driven by an environmentalist agenda:

The trouble started in 2005, when Kevin Lunny, a local rancher, purchased the oyster farm from Johnson Oyster Co. He was required to get a special-use permit from the California Coastal Commission, which had placed a cease-and-desist order on the property as a result of previous problems.

In the midst of those negotiations and discussions about extending the 2012 lease, the Park Service came out with accusations of environmental damage, setting off a series of dueling scientific reports.

“What has happened is the National Academy of Sciences has shown that all the claims made by the National Park Service are wrong,” Lunny said. “It gives us a clean bill of health.”

Lunny and others claim Jon Jarvis, the Pacific West regional director of the National Park Service, deliberately misrepresented data to bolster his own ideological agenda.

Jarvis apologized Tuesday for mistakes that were made on the initial report but defended the Park Service’s handling of the science.

“They didn’t say our research was wrong. They just said it was incomplete,” Jarvis said. “What there really is here is a disagreement among scientists about the level of impact on the environment. That does not mean that one side is guilty of misconduct.”

The battle intensified in 2007, when the Park Service issued a report claiming, among other things, that oyster farming reduced the number of harbor seals and damaged eelgrass beds.

Lunny, who is trying to persuade the Park Service to renew a 40-year occupancy agreement in 2012, was furious. His case was helped by Corey Goodman, a biological scientist who reviewed Park Service studies on oysters.

They accused Park Service officials of fabricating environmental problems to drive the oyster company off the bay where explorer Sir Francis Drake purportedly landed more than 430 years ago.

Be sure to read the whole article. At best, the Park Service study was incompetent; at worst, it was a hit job meant to serve a Green objective (2), rather than objective science. Whatever the truth, a venerable business has been wrecked, livelihoods ruined, and the economy of California’s rural north, which has already suffered terribly (3) at the hands of environmental extremists, takes another blow.

This is another example of Washington-as-Leviathan, where abstract policy goals (and big donor groups) come before the needs of individual people, and science is a tool to be used to reach that goal, rather than a source of information leading to a wise, just decision.

(And didn’t Obama want to depoliticize science? Never mind…)

Of course, in the midst of this sad story is some irony, too. The Lunny’s farm is near Inverness, in Marin County, which is infamous in its liberalism. While we don’t know how the people of the area voted in the last election, Marin as a whole went 75% for Obama. (For comparison, California overall voted “only” 60% for the President.) Thus I think it’s safe to say a majority of the affected people likely were Obama voters.

How’s that for gratitude, folks?

That bit of snark aside, what’s happening here is unjust and needless, and one hopes that pressure from the public and Senator Feinstein’s office will find a way to undo the harm caused by Secretary Salazar’s arrogance. You can see a short documentary on the Lunny’s battle at Hot Air.

Afterthought: I suppose one can also take grim satisfaction at the thought of rich Bay-Area liberals having to pay more for their precious shellfish, given that Salazar’s decision will massively contract the available supply. Nah. They’ll never make the connection.

(1) Except for the High Priests of the faith, such as Al Gore, who can jet around the globe as much as they need and just buy themselves absolution via the carbon credits scam.
(2) Of course, that’s S.O.P for Ken Salazar, who was found by a federal judge to have misrepresented the science in a report used to justify a moratorium on drilling permits in the Gulf after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
(3) Other than marijuana, now that logging, mining, and fishing have been all but killed. If you eliminate legitimate industries, people will turn to what they have to in order to survive.

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

10 Responses to “Interior Department destroys 100-year old small business”


  1. Extirpates says:

    The department of the inferior is led by the most inferior of all,
    the short balding fool call with a cowboy hat. He must think he is a law unto himself.

  2. Lorica says:

    “They didn’t say our research was wrong. They just said it was incomplete,” Jarvis said. “What there really is here is a disagreement among scientists about the level of impact on the environment. That does not mean that one side is guilty of misconduct.”

    Says the guilty. – Lorica

  3. Sefton says:

    Sounds like another implementation of Agenda 21.

  4. Drew the Infidel says:

    I remember that scientist the Park Service used. He sat between me and Sasquatch on the UFO.

  5. redgypsy says:

    How soon do you suppose before there’s an overgrowth of the oysters, which then will cause who-knows-what kind of other natural disaster/unintended consequence?

    But that’s okay; a hundred-year-old business, who-know-how-many livelihoods, and the price of some tasty seafood, all has been ruined.

    Mission Accomplished.


  6. John Scotus says:

    This is really not surprising. Since when have liberals or environmentalists ever let facts or promises get in the way of their agendas?

  7. Michael Johnston says:

    So what would happen if the company decided not to abide by the decision? Suppose 100, or a 1000, or 5000 Californians showed up and put up a defensive perimeter around the business and said “Molon Labe”? I can’t imagine anyone in California actually doing that but do wonder if at some point the Government Of the People, By the People, and For the People will overstep far enough to create the conditions that force people to respond. Patrick Henry once said, and I quote” The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain government. It appears this has been forgotten by many of those in power today and the next “Boston TEA Party” is only one overstepping rule or regulation away.

  8. Carlos says:

    “…now that logging, mining, and fishing have been all but killed…”

    Don’t forget legitimate agriculture here, Phineas. While not on life support yet, judicial constraints (salmon runs) and environmental activism (against any fertilizing or use of pesticides) have headed the rich farming areas of the north in the same direction.

  9. Steve Skubinna says:

    I’d feel a lot sorrier about this if it were happening in another state. But welcome to your future, California. You vote for more government, you get more government. And less of everything else.

  10. Carlos says:

    Maybe they can call Detroit and ask them to float California a loan? Both Detroit and California are about to find out the real cost of everything that the government does for “free.”