E-Mail 'Obama: #HarryReidsShutdown "encouraged our enemies", you unpatriotic GOP jerks' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'Obama: #HarryReidsShutdown "encouraged our enemies", you unpatriotic GOP jerks' to a friend

Loading ...

10 Responses to "Obama: #HarryReidsShutdown “encouraged our enemies”, you unpatriotic GOP jerks"

TomTB says:

October 18, 2013 at 9:52 am

As I recall, SENATOR Obama accused President Bush of being anti-patriotic for wanting to raise the debt ceiling…
Carlos says:

October 18, 2013 at 12:24 pm

…Mr Obama said Republicans who had “pushed for the shutdown” had succeeded only in creating a spectacle of poor governance that had tarnished America’s credibility in the world.

Right conclusion, wrong people to blame. Of course, if he really wanted to get accurate, he’d blame everything he’s done in the past 5-1/2 years for that “spectacle of poor governance.”
Great White Rat says:

October 18, 2013 at 12:38 pm

Well, look at the bright side. It’s the first time he’s ever referred to anyone except Republicans as ‘enemies’.

(/sarcasm)
Drew the Infidel says:

October 18, 2013 at 6:38 pm

When you are detailing the workings of a failed Presidency such as this one, all bets are off. As far as emboldened enemies and encouraged competitors are concerned, who is to blame for those things in regard to how easily the Russians outmaneuvered him on Syria.

Commiecrats always give themselves away. Their expatiated vitriol is always reserved for those of whom they are most afraid (TEA Party, Ted Cruz, etc.).
observer says:

October 19, 2013 at 8:45 am

Drawing a line in the sand is one thing, but holding the nation hostage over settled law is quite another, bordering on treason! We still have the ballot box I do believe.

That said, Cruz and Company have not learned the lesson on this, so we can already see there is more of the same, emanating from our radical right, which can only further deteriorate our national health and global standing.

(/no sarcasm)
bobbi says:

October 19, 2013 at 9:00 am

An article in NY Times 2008 described adjunct Prof Obama’s course a study in “victimology”. Basically focused on the horrors of lynching etc. Of course, we know that he is a Saul Alinsky student, so allthese tactics of ridiculing, etc. fil the bill.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/07/us/politics/07community.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Drew the Infidel says:

October 19, 2013 at 11:14 am

On Obhammud’s academic credentials, it should be noted he and Moochelle have both been stripped of their law licenses.

Try this:

Obhammud came home one day and found Moochelle crying. “Why are you crying?”, he asked.
She tearfully replied, “I baked a cake for you and the dog ate it.”
“Aw, that’s OK”, he said. “It was an old dog anyway.”
steveegg says:

October 19, 2013 at 11:58 am

The sequester is settled law, so why was Dingy Harry holding the country hostage over that?
Drew the Infidel says:

October 19, 2013 at 1:03 pm

It all evidently depends on your definition of “settled law”. The Second Amendment is “settled law” as well but that does not stop this corrupt administration from taking the unrestrained emotionalism attached to one isolated politically-charged incident and using it as a springboard to question or alter over 230 years of hard-fought constitutional liberties, practice, and tradition.
Zippy says:

October 22, 2013 at 2:55 pm

UGH = translation = excessive use of profanity with eye rolling.

Comments are closed.