in the wrong era. Soundly refuting
liberals online since 2000. :)
| Daniel Halper | 0 | |
| The Hill | 0 | |
| NBC DFW | Unreal: Accused Fort Hood Shooter Paid $278,000 While Awaiting Trial |
0 |
| WaPo | Fail: Protesters arrested after attempt to storm Justice Department |
0 |
| Kirsten Powers | Must-Read: How Hope and Change Gave Way to Spying on the Press |
0 |
Audacity of Truth
Move Along:
""The whole issue of this - of talking points, frankly, throughout this process has been a sideshow. The whole thing defies logic. And the fact that this keeps on getting churned out, frankly, has a lot to do with political motivations."
Pres. Obama on GOP demands for Benghazi answers, 5/13/2013
The ‘Privacy Clause’?
Patterico links up to an interview with Senators Christopher Dodd (D-Conn) and Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) from Fox News, as posted at the Washington Post’s blog. Seems Senator Dodd has found a new clause in the Constitution (emphasis added by me):
The open-ended question for us clearly is what are his views about some of the basic values, the equal protection clause, the privacy clause of the Constitution. These are things that members of the Congress through their — and their representatives want to know about during the confirmation process.
Interesting. Maybe next he’ll be talking about the Santa Claus of the Constitution.
In all seriousness, statements like this are maddening because, of course, there is no such "clause" in the Constitution and anyone who hears him who doesn’t know that will simply nod their heads and say "yeah! We need to do that." One has to wonder whether this was deliberate on the part of Sen. Dodd or if he really is that ignorant of what the laws of our land really are.
RSS feed for comments on this post.
just me testing
Sen McConnell is R-Ky
got me
Thanks for the correction Jim. That’s what I get for typing so fast
Is this the same Jim who used to comment here a while back?
First time visiting this site – I like it!
Thanks Ryan
You’re welcome! Keep up the good work! I need some sort of escape while living here in the People’s Republic of California.
No, new Jim. Like the site; will be back.
Jim2
Cool – thanks, Jim2
Actually, you will not see a Democrat reference to Santa Claus because they are trying to avoid any Sanity Clause in Supreme Court decisions.
LOL! Isn’t that the truth
But I thought that Marx (Groucho, not Karl) taught us that there was no such thing as a Sanity Clause. Really great blog, by the way.
I know I personally have never heard of the Sanity Clause … the Insanity one, yeah
The Dems have been rewriting the Constitution on an impromptu basis for years in the course of their speeches and interviews. It’s the Utopian angle:
This is how I believe it would be in a perfect world, therefore this is how it is.”