
FrontPage Magazine has an interview with former UNSCOM inspector (1996-1998) Bill Tierney on what happened to Iraqs WMDs, which we all know Saddam Hussein had. The question has been, since the war with Iraq started and the massive stockpiles we expected to find weren’t there is: where did they go?
What I found particularly interesting about this piece was when Tierney believed that Saddam began preparing for a possible war with the US: 2002 (emphasis added):
While working counter-infiltration in Baghdad, I noticed a pattern among infiltrators that their cover stories would start around Summer or Fall of 2002. From this and other observations, I believe Saddam planned for a U.S. invasion after President Bush’s speech at West Point in 2002. One of the steps taken was to prepare the younger generation of the security services with English so they could infiltrate our ranks, another was either to destroy or move WMDs to other countries, principally Syria. Starting in the Summer of 2002, the Iraqis had months to purge their files and create cover stories, such as the letter from Hossam Amin, head of the Iraqi outfit that monitored the weapons inspectors, stating after Hussein Kamal’s defection that the weapons were all destroyed in 1991
Note the Syria connection, which Tierney makes several times in the article. It has long been speculated that there were stockpiles of weapons moved from Iraq to Syria over the course of several months prior to the starting of the war with Iraq. While certainly it’s possible that Saddam started preparations sometime in the summer of 2002, it’s also very possible that the seed was planted in his head that the US aimed to finally disarm Iraq by a top official in Syria, who was told by none other than US Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) in January 2002 that he (Sen. Rockefeller) believed that the President was preparing to invade Iraq. By Rockefeller’s own admission (emphasis added):
SEN. ROCKEFELLER: No. The – I mean, this question is asked a thousand times and I’ll be happy to answer it a thousand times. I took a trip by myself in January of 2002 to Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Syria, and I told each of the heads of state that it was my view that George Bush had already made up his mind to go to war against Iraq – that that was a predetermined set course which had taken shape shortly after 9/11.
It’s become more and more clear to me, and anyone else who has followed the story of what happened to Iraq’s WMDs that Saddam Hussein had plenty of time to move, hide, flush down a river, bury, and/or destroy the unaccounted-for stockpiles of WMD. Not only is it very likely that he received advance notice of this through a top Syrian official thanks to the big mouth of a Democratic US Senator, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that the back and forth wrangling at the UN we had to do from the time the President made his speech there in September 2002 to the time of the actual start of the war, Saddam Hussein had plenty of time to move WMDs. In my view, this is thanks to the spineless UN and an anti-war Democratic US Senator who tipped him off via discussions with an ally to Iraq: Syria.
Hat tip to Lorie Byrd for the FrontPage link.
(Cross-posted at Blogs For Bush)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Baklava,
Try reading Pam’s comments about me.
You are a man?
So even though there was no evidence of WMDs, which you yourself admit, they are guilty and deserve to be illegally invaded? To have entire cities wiped out? To bomb civilians in the hope of getting one ‘terrorist’?
Please note for the record that before the Bush Jr. administration, civilains that defended their country from invaders were called rebels or freedom fighters, not ‘terrorists’.
But anyways back to the point. By your logic you yourself then think its ok if you are convicted and thrown in jail without any proof of what you are accused of? I highly doubt you would approve so eagerly.
what happened to the foundation of our legal system. INNOCENT UNTILL PROVEN GUILTY.
I guess that only applies to us special Americans.
P.S. I WAS a Republican untill last elections. So stow your stereotypes for someone who doesnt see through the thin veil of hypocrisy.
Cartaker, you are just another claim to be RINO. I don’t think you ever were a real Republican.
The truth is that the invasion WAS LEGAL. Saddam was in violation of 17 UN security council resolutions and of the Gulf War cease fire. From your rhetoric, I don’t believe you really care about truth, just spreading your propaganda.
Cartaker wrote, “deserve to be illegally invaded? To have entire cities wiped out? To bomb civilians in the hope of getting one ‘terrorist’
You could’ve written that about Yugoslavia/Bosnia….
BTW, “illegal” means something. You lie if you continue to use the word.
Caretaker wrote, “By your logic you yourself then think its ok if you are convicted and thrown in jail without any proof of what you are accused of?”
Does this mean the supposed guilty (Saddam) should be reinserted and given his country back by your logic Caretaker? That would do disservice to the troops and Iraqi civilians who have tried for the last 2 years to put their country towards a better life for everyone and democracy. I’m not sure why you’d be hell bent on doing that…. If you aren’t hell bent on doing that… I guess the point is that we are there and so what are you saying? Pull out now before the job is finished? Or do the right thing and finish the job?
The people here aren’t hypocrates as you called them in your last paragraph. They just have a different perspective than you and are guided by wanting to finish the job as opposed to what you want to do (which by the way you DIDN’T STATE – you only lashed out).