| WaPo | McChrystal’s plan for Afghanistan war remains largely intact |
0 |
| WSJ | 0 | |
| Ras. Reports | 0 | |
| Fox News | 0 | |
| ABC News | Amanda Knox Found Guilty for Meredith Kercher Murder, Sentenced to 26 Years |
0 |
Audacity of Truth
Show Trial Central:
“We have taken the view that the judiciary does not have the ability necessarily to certainly require us to, with people who are held overseas, to release them ... It’s hard for me to imagine a set of circumstances, given the other things that we could do with Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, that would result in him being freed."
-AG Eric Holder, 11/18/09
Velvet Lair- Is my dad turning into a metrosexual? November 24, 2009
- My “Things To Do For Christmas” list November 23, 2009
- Suddenly, last summer November 22, 2009
- Living with New Moon fever November 20, 2009
- Boo! :-) October 31, 2009
Democrats.com: Totally Unglued (with screencaps)
In apparent “retaliation” for the President’s authorization of warrantless wiretaps in order to eavesdrop on conversations between people alleged to have ties to terror, Democrats.com is encouraging its readers to spy …… on the Republican party – and is offering to reimburse readers the costs associated with doing so. I won’t link to the post in question directly from this blog, but you can read all the details about it at Michelle Malkin’s.
Screencaps are below. The first one is the top part of the post, and the second one is the rest of it.
Make sure to check out the comments section there as well.
Un.be.lievable.
Read more via Iowa Voice, Sweetness and Light, Ace, Sundries Shack, Anchoress
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Trackbacks
14 Responses to “Democrats.com: Totally Unglued (with screencaps)”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
“Un.be.lievable.”
Duh! you’re not supposed to tell people you’re spying on them.
Time for a little break for you, Andrew. My patience has run out. Try back this weekend. –ST
Bob Fertik is the new Richard Nixon.
Nixon was forced to resign for the very same offense.
The Bush haters acknowledge that anyone with enough money can already “spy” into the private records of citizens. Those without funding can probably hack their way into phone records and many other private records. They have no problem with this and even encourage others to do it.
But they have a problem when government agents examine similar records with the intent to protect the public from terrorists attacks. I think their priorities are seriously misplaced.
- Payback for Watergate?…. *snort* … and people say the Liberaslackers are “slow”…. that only took 36 years…
- Bang –
Sounds like McCarthyism to me…
We’ve come full circle.
Witchhunts = Democrats.com tactics
Snore.
You’re just jealous they thought of it first.
(Come on, think of the possibilities…)
I’d be more annoyed about the fact that companies are allowed to sell your phone records in the first place.
To people that are not you.
Democrats spying?
No!
Say it isn’t so……
Though I am very sure Michael Steel can tell you what it is like being on the receiving end of Democrat spying programs.
I’m not surprised by this. Look at Chuckie Schumer and his staff. They practiced Identity theft on MD Lt.Gov. Michael Steele. How many others have they done it to? Clnton perused 900 FBI files on Republicans and fobbed off the blame on a former bar bouncer they hired.
Doesn’t anyone remember Bob Beckel and DNC member/CA Democrat Activist Bob Mulholland trying to blackmail the Electoral College?
The Democrats are dirty, and that is putting it very mildly.
Rove has been doing this for years. He learned it from Donald Seggretti who was trained by Cheney and Rumsfeld in Nixon’s Office of Special Assignments(’69-’73). The difference is that Rove is a part of the US government and Democrats.com is a private LLC. Peace
steve, provide proof or take your lie back.
Do your own research. If you think someone has lied, look it up! Don’t be lazy and just accept what others feed you. My opinion can be easily distinguished from what I cite as fact. Peace
Thanks steve for showing that you don’t back up what you say because what you say is so whack to begin with.