MSNBC Hardball correspondent David Shuster caught in multiple reporting errors

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on April 11, 2006 at 1:13 pm

… regarding le affaire de Plame.

I’ve seen bad reporting in my time, but this case is one of the worst I’ve seen where multiple instances in the same report are involved. Nathan Goulding at National Review’s “Media Blog” reports on three errors here, and Stephen Spruiell points to blogger Seixon’s catching another error in the report.

Is there any wonder at why so many are turning to alternative sources for their news rather than the MSM?

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

  • The Dread Pundit Bluto trackbacked with Fitz Puts (Mis)Stake Through Shuster's Heart
  • 9 Responses to “MSNBC Hardball correspondent David Shuster caught in multiple reporting errors”

    Comments

    1. G Monster says:

      This is why Fox News keeps gaining viewers. They show both sides to an issue, and actually report the news with journalistic integrity. I do think Geraldo is a liability though.

    2. Baklava says:

      G wrote, “They show both sides to an issue

      You mean the wrong and right side of an issue? :-"

    3. steve says:

      The point of this excercise is that bush and his henchmen tried to destroy a citizen who disagreed with their policy. bush and Rove did it to McCain and countless others. bush is immoral and a criminal and all of the Rights spinning won’t change those facts. Peace

    4. Baklava says:

      Dismantling an argument (lie) by someone is not destroying a citizen who disagreed with the policy.

      Nice try. Even more peace.

    5. Blogs and other forms of media are gaining steam. Thats one reason FOX has viewers pouring from all other channels. If they keep the work up they will stay at top.

    6. - Steve(FN) and the rest of his commie pals are going the way of the dinosaur. The lies keep getting more and more feckless. Adios amigo’s….

      - Bang **==

    7. The Captain says:

      The Jason Blair for MSM. As long as your a ‘journalist’ it seems that there’s no accountablity for lying.