The 2004 election was stolen!!!!!!

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on June 1, 2006 at 3:41 pm

liberal font/ Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. tells us exactly how.

Because, you see, there’s no way a majority of Americans would be stupid enough to re-elect Dumbya!

/liberal font

RSS feed for comments on this post.

11 Responses to “The 2004 election was stolen!!!!!!”

Comments

  1. Baklava says:

    Good stuff to read right before I go into my 1PM to 4PM meeting. :((

  2. G Monster says:

    Interesting article by Robert F Kennedy Jr. When Robert stops wasting fuel flying around on private jets and lecturing to the rest of us to conserve fuel, maybe I will listen to what he has to say.

  3. benning says:

    RFK, Jr. has always impressed me as a rather dim individual. The fact that this is published by Rolling Stone should be the first warning!

    What rot. Another Kennedy descends into Moonbattery.

  4. Severian says:

    Yawn, more of the same. Biased exit polls didn’t match the actual votes! Shock, amazement, deep hysteria! It must be a Republican plot!

    How dumb are liberals anyway (wait, don’t answer that, I already I know). Next time, try to get a presidential candidate that’s not a nutcase trying desperately to relive his “glory” days of Vietnam (before he bailed out on a technicality), and with absolutely no legislative stature other than as a whiny “me too” or flip flopping leftist.

  5. - This is all the usual “ooooooooo conspiracy” BS, that the left is so famous for. They just are the worst losers in history, which for them is a really bad thing because they’re doing a lot of it lately.

    - He mentions that in almost every case he checked the results of a recount/investigation, what have you, almost always favored Bush. Well Duuuuuuuuuhhhh. that’s what gets their shorts in such a Twist. They do sure theres something weird going on, and when they insist on checking it, in almost every case I’
    ve seen really dug into going all the way back to 2000, the results not only favor, but generally bolster the Reps even more than expected.

    - The Left is like the guy who pushes his finger into a fan, and then keeps doing it over and over because he just can’t believe a fan will hurt that much.

    - The core of his piece is based on the “oooooooo Mysterious” PEW exit poll results. Well maybe they’re still mysterious to Junior, but PEW themselves admited it was simply poor data collecting, and by the way I thought it was remarkable that the PEW people didn’t bat an eye at admiting they were “out scouting polling places for Kerry’s campaign”. Interesting. And they’re poll was the one every damn left wing paper and TV/cable channel, just happened to use. Do the Liberals ever get tired of lying to themselves and the public.

    - Anyway, this is just another pile of bunk. the truth is if every vote was checked, as they were several times in some cases, in spite of the lies the Dems will try to say, Bush may well have won by even a larger margin.

    - I watch this stuff day after day, year in and year out, and I just thank the lord I don’t have to live my life as the typical moonbat does, afraid of the “lurking” shadows and conspiracies under every bed. what a miserable situation that must be. But it explains a lot of their anger, and non-sensible thinking and gullibility.

    - Bang **==

  6. - Heres that 2nd para over – got messed somehow….

    - He mentions that in almost every case he checked the results of a recount/investigation, what have you, almost always favored Bush. Well Duuuuuuuuuhhhh. that’s what gets their shorts in such a Twist. They’re so sure theres something weird going on, and when they insist on checking it, in almost every case I’ve seen really dug into, going all the way back to 2000, the results not only favor, but generally bolster the Reps even more than expected.

    - In fact in Florida, one of the states they were screaming about the loudest, since its a key swing state, Bush ended up with an additional 456,000+ votes after the Democratic demanded triple recount, and dozens of “voter irregularities” investigations, which turned out to be Democrat mistakes in 95% of the cases. They just can accept the truth. Kind of funny for the “reality based community”.

    - Bang **==

  7. Marshall Art says:

    Well here’s a pleasant thought (sarcasm): the May 31 edition of AmericanThinker.com has an article on the media’s throwing off Hillary in favor of (gasp) Algore! The “stolen election” crap reminded me of it. Of what could they possibly be thinking?

  8. - I’m watching all the AlGore stuff with amusement because I think I see whats going on. I mentioned a few days ago that the hard left had put out the word that they don’t want the Hilldebeast, because they think shes to centrist on the WOT.

    - I don’t think anyone seriously thinks Gore would have a chance (I’m not ruling anything out at this point because the left proved with Kerry that partisan fevor over rules anything approaching common sense with them), but they’re going to do everything they can to derail the Clintonista’s, who already understand the situation, and turned to their own fundraising and campaigning tactics, pretty much officially last week.

    - As a backdrop to all this manuevering, the DU have been very angry, saying that they feel like just checkbooks from the amount of attention they’ve been getting from the DNC, added to the fact that Dean is in deep doodoo with the Chairmanship. Think about when’s the last time you saw him with one of his base rallying idiot statements. I think the last one I remember was the infamous 5 points to win the Iraq war, which was five steps to cut and run, and nothing since.

    - Whatever else is going on the Left is in a great deal of Chaos right now, so much so, that people like Pelosi are lying low, Reid has his own problems, and even Schumer has suddenly clammed up. Kennedy has all but dissapeared. You may be seeing a real rift between the centrists and the hard left forming up for an all out battle.

  9. jeff says:

    This is going to sound way off topic, and it is, but I’m honestly curious about this: who do you guys see as a viable republican candidate for president in 2008?

  10. Dunno, jeff – I had some high hopes for Bill Frist when he first became Senate Majority leader but he’s out of the question now, because too many Republicans (including me) think he’s too wishy washy with Democrats.

    I like Mitt Romney and Haley Barbour but I don’t know if either of them would have a shot at it.

  11. jeff says:

    Barbour may be a tough sell, his Katrina response will always draw criticism and he might not have the name recognition to pull in the jack. Romney might actually deserve the title “compasionate conservative” and is a very attractive candidate for his track record of balancing the state budget in Mass. And, who are we kidding, wouldn’t it be a republican wet-dream to get a righty from Tax-achussettes into the white house? It’s going to be interesting. I’m just going to wait until the NY Times does a cover story on one of their marriages until I decide.