All about life, liberty and the pursuit of hopeiness.
| CBS News | 0 | |
| WaPo | 0 | |
| Zogby | North Dakota Senator Byron Dorgan Trails in Potential 2010 Senate Match-up |
0 |
| SF Chron | 0 | |
| KDVR | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Big Government- Hot Air
- Michelle Malkin
- Wheeling & dealing: Snowe pow-wows with Obama; Landrieu, Schumer, Daschle behind the scenes
- Saturday in the Senate: Cash for Cloture; Reid gets 60; Update: 8:15pm Eastern cloture vote – 60-39; Voinovich absent; Dems invoke Teddy Kennedy; Reid: “Ted would be happy.”
- Another day, another Berkeley tantrum
- Jake Tapper
- Lynn Sweet
I have seen it all now (Thurs/Fri open thread)
Check this out: Voice-activated remote control.
Now, I’ll be the first to say that I love the convenience of having a remote control and not having to get up to change a channel, but are we couch poatatoes so much so that we don’t even want to make the effort to hit the buttons on the remote anymore? Sheesh … 
RSS feed for comments on this post.
10 Responses to “I have seen it all now (Thurs/Fri open thread)”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
Is a voice-activated remote control really so strange? After all – the MSM and their Democrat pets do the thinking for about half of the country.
Another eloquent article on Iraq by Senator Joe Lieberman.
You have to wonder why it is that only one prominent liberal can clearly see the stakes in Iraq:
And yet Reid, Pelosi, Obama, Clinton, Edwards, and the rest of their ilk are fine with that. Just once, I’d like to see that reality presented to them as a question in one of their debates.
He’s also learned that there are geopolitical consequences of abandoning friends under attack:
It’s rare you can find clear thinking from a liberal on any subject. This is the exception. Read the whole thing.
This would be funny if it weren’t so pathetic and dumb.
You remember Jim McGreevey. He’s the former NJ governor who took his job so seriously that he put his boyfriend in charge of the state’s department of Homeland Security before resigning as a means of spotlighting his homosexuality. Now he’s in the midst of a divorce, and the case is getting messy:
Not so, says the ex-governor. Care to take a guess what he thinks is the real reason her book sales have tanked?
Well, she wears tacky clothes:
Geez. Like it’s not enough of an embarrassment being from NJ with all the moonbats running around loose in charge of things here….
High Court Upholds Curb on Political Use of Union Fees
Unanimous, as in 9-0. Ripping off non-members to finance Big Labor’s political warchest is now illegal.
Liberals being what they are, they were already looking for ways to slither around the outcome of the case:
Riiiiight. So the money the unions spend on politicking comes in… how? Falls off trees? Is left under their pillow by the Tooth Fairy? Maybe comes from wise cattle-future investments? With the exception of Lieberman on Iraq, is it possible for libs to be honest about a subject? Ever???
GWR,
No, Libs have to lie. It is genetic and pathological.
Oh, and now this:
Hillary’s been trying to capitalize on a photo she had taken with Mother Teresa years ago, putting it on her campaign website to fool voters into thinking she would have had the endorsement of the late saint.
But Mother Teresa religious order got wind of the stunt and complained, and now it’s been pulled from the web site:
Inappropriate, disrecpectful, disturbing, and shameless. But not at all surprising, is it?
(Sorry, ST, but for some reason today I’m just a linking fool.)
Speaking of Links GWR: Note the closing paragraph. Then look up a bit on the left side above the opinions and editorials link. Probably no relation, just a coincidence but, if I were a troother or one of Goreacles sage’s, I’d have to question SOMETHING!
I wonder how low the % would be w/o adding in the reporters.
I just realized that the story as well as the ads rotate, leaving my link w/o point!
Someone, please PLEASE find some evidence that this was Photoshopped somehow. I’d really hate to believe it’s an authentic picture.
Because if it is, the picture tells you all you will ever need to know about Hillary and where the Democrats’ heads are today.
Here they go again: a heartbroken Associated Press tries to minimize the meaning of the French parliamentary elections.
Sarkozy party wins, but not in landslide
Count on the MSM to downplay any election results it doesn’t like. For example, the AP doesn’t like these returns:
So I pulled out the trusty calculator and did the math.
Sarkozy’s party got 346 out of 577 seats. That comes to 60%. The socialists and their allies got 226 seats, or 39%.
But to AP, 60-39 is not a landslide. Not when the winning side is so, so….pro-American!!!
Do you think for one minute that if the Democrats won a 60% majority in the House or Senate that we’d see even ONE story in the MSM cautioning that this was not a landslide? On the contrary, we’d be subjected to an endless stream of articles with titles like “Can the GOP survive?” As I recall, the MSM treated Bill Clinton’s two elections as ‘mandates’, even though he never got 50% of the vote.
AP even led the story with a picture of the Socialists’ losing presidential candidate. One thing you have to say for the AP: they know how to shake their pom poms for their team.
But on the bright side, 60% means President Sarkozy should be able to pass most of his free market reforms. Although I’m sure every slight bump in the road will end of on the mediots’ front pages.