Congress slipped into the recent energy bill a mandate that within four years the everyday incandescent bulb is to disappear from the shelves of your local grocery and hardware stores. In it’s place? The fluorescent bulb that for years many consumers have avoided.
The list of complaints about fluorescent bulbs is long. Some are bothered by the higher price, others by the harsher light, others by their lack of adaptability to household fixtures, and still others by concerns over their mercury content.
So on what grounds has Washington justified this unwanted intrusion into our lives?
They say that these high-mercury bulbs will reduce the strain on our energy supply, reduce the carbon footprint, and lead to greater energy efficiency. But there’s little to no evidence to back up their claims.
Congress has intruded on your shopping list on a whim; in favor of a fad.
Well, that doesn’t sit well with me and I know it doesn’t sit well with you.
America was founded on the idea that people are far better able to make their own decisions than the government.
So I’ve [introduced] the Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act, which makes a simple challenge to Big Brother: either Congress’ own independent investigative arm, the Government Accountability Office (GAO), marshals evidence to back up the assumptions behind the light bulb ban â€“ or Congress repeals the mandate.
In other words, I’m asking Congress to actually be â€“ hold your breath â€“ accountable to the people. If they are going to intrude into our lives, and control our most basic decisions, the least they can do is have enough respect for the American people to back-up their claims.
Specifically, my bill would ask the GAO to study whether the ban:
1.) leads to lower costs for consumers,
2.) leads to reduced carbon emissions, and
3.) does not lead to a health risk, particularly for vulnerable populations, like those in nursing homes, day care centers, schools, and hospitals.
It’s nice to see that true conservatism isn’t dead in the House after all