All about life, liberty and the pursuit of hopeiness.
| Times Online | 0 | |
| Fox Boston | 0 | |
| Merc. News | 0 | |
| Big Govt | Obama’s Shock Troops: SEIU and Political Intimidation in St. Louis |
0 |
| NYT | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Whiner-in-Chief:
"[W]hether the grumbling is about Republicans on Fox or bloggers in pajamas, there's a word for what the president and his aides are doing. That word is "whining." And nothing [...] does more damage to Obama's credibility or authority than the sense that a popular president is becoming the whiner-in-chief."
- John Nichols, Nation Magazine - 10/12/09
The NYT on the Hamdan ruling
I’m buried under as usual today but I wanted to link up to Andy McCarthy’s slam of today’s NYT editorial, which is titled “Guilty as Ordered” (emphasis mine) in reference to the recent guilty ruling in Gitmo’s Hamdan trial.   As expected, the NYT is reflexively anti-Bush, strongly implying that he is a dicator prone to imperial rule. Both McCarthy’s rebuttal, as well as NRO’s response, go a long way towards providing the details the NYT, of course, won’t.Â
(Hat tip: ST reader Leslie)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
One Response to “The NYT on the Hamdan ruling”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
Yes, but this lowlife only got 5 1/2 years. Unbelievable. 5 1/2 years.
Bin Laden’s Driver Gets 5 1/2 Years
B-b-b-b-ut I thought that King George ordered his conviction? Surely, he would order more of a sentence then that, eh New York Times?? You must have something nice to say about him now, after all, he only gave your biggest fan a 5 1/2 year sentence.
If it weren’t so tragic, I could laugh……