Brit media figures out what the American media refuses to acknowledge

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on March 7, 2009 at 9:41 pm

The UK media, surprisingly, has been all over President Obama the last week or so after the bungled handling of Prime Minister Gordon Brown’s visit to the US by Obama officials – and Obama himself.

The Telegraph has apparently discovered the root of the problem: Barack Obama is in over his head (via Tom Maguire):

Sources close to the White House say Mr Obama and his staff have been “overwhelmed” by the economic meltdown and have voiced concerns that the new president is not getting enough rest.

British officials, meanwhile, admit that the White House and US State Department staff were utterly bemused by complaints that the Prime Minister should have been granted full-blown press conference and a formal dinner, as has been customary. They concede that Obama aides seemed unfamiliar with the expectations that surround a major visit by a British prime minister.

But Washington figures with access to Mr Obama’s inner circle explained the slight by saying that those high up in the administration have had little time to deal with international matters, let alone the diplomatic niceties of the special relationship.

Allies of Mr Obama say his weary appearance in the Oval Office with Mr Brown illustrates the strain he is now under, and the president’s surprise at the sheer volume of business that crosses his desk.

A well-connected Washington figure, who is close to members of Mr Obama’s inner circle, expressed concern that Mr Obama had failed so far to “even fake an interest in foreign policy”.

A British official conceded that the furore surrounding the apparent snub to Mr Brown had come as a shock to the White House. “I think it’s right to say that their focus is elsewhere, on domestic affairs. A number of our US interlocutors said they couldn’t quite understand the British concerns and didn’t get what that was all about.”

The American source said: “Obama is overwhelmed. There is a zero sum tension between his ability to attend to the economic issues and his ability to be a proactive sculptor of the national security agenda.

“That was the gamble these guys made at the front end of this presidency and I think they’re finding it a hard thing to do everything.”

Look – I’ll be the first to say that I don’t envy any new Presidents and the numerous issues they face once they take office. Every new President has had his fair share of conflicts, difficult tasks, etc. to deal with, some worse than others. Eight months into his presidency, Bush faced the worst attack the US has suffered since Pearl Harbor, and he performed admirably in the months after 9-11 because not only did he understand the need to directly confront the terrorist threats we faced with more than just a “law enforcement” approach, but because he also had a team surrounding him who were experienced enough to know what they were doing (give or take a few). Barack Obama is dealing with a domestic economic crisis the US hasn’t dealt with in decades, but not only has his lack of experience come back to bite him in the you-know-where (Ed Morrissey says toldya so here), but his selection of mostly Clinton admin retreads has proven to be disastrous because on domestic policy they think they can resolve the economic mess this country finds itself in with more liberal policies – even though it was liberal policies that greatly enabled the “greedy” lenders and people who couldn’t afford their loans to get away with what they did in the first place!

What is it that they say about those who don’t learn from history?

Also, as a sidenote, let’s just pause for five seconds to think about how the left and the mainstream media (I know – I’m repeating myself) would have reacted if it had been Bush who bungled so badly any head of state visit as badly as Obama did with Brown. Let’s imagine for another five seconds had it been Condi Rice who presented the red “overcharge” button to Russia’s Foreign Minister, or had “mispronounced her EU counterparts’ names.” Right. None of us need that five seconds on either one because we know how they would have reacted. They went absolutely ballistic when Bush gave German Chancellor Angela Merkel an innocent light shoulder rub that was an unwritten violation of the “personal space” rule as well as gave off the appearance of “sexual harassment” (well, at least it did to “outraged” lefties, anyway). Even when Bush got his appearances with heads of state right (which was most of the time) the left still found ways to try and make him look like a dunce. Yet, Obama’s bungles with Gordon and La Clinton’s fumble with the “overcharge” button are portrayed in light-hearted “but c’mon, they’re really trying – give them time” tones with the mainstream press and most of their cohorts on the left. The NYT even sympathetically wrote about Obama’s “graying hair” a couple of days ago as “evidence” of how the challenges confronting him are taking their toll – even though he was actually graying well before he was elected the 44th President of the United States.

Gosh, the job of a President sure is hard work. Who’da thought?!

Too bad Barack Obama didn’t grasp that fact before he decided to run for President. But he was too busy portraying himself as messiah-like healer to figure it out; not only that, but he was surrounded by fawning admirers who treated him that way – like the mainstream media, Democrats who were in awe of him, and by starstruck “moderate” Republicans like David Brooks. This trio of Obama admirers/groupies greatly aided persuading a majority of the American people to put the fate of this country into the hands of a guy who was a State Senator from Illinois just four years ago, a guy who surrounded himself with leftist radicals while rising to the top in Illinois, and a guy who is the scariest kind of radical of all: one who makes radical, socialistic ideas on issues like bank nationalization seem “mainstream.”

Do I feel any schadenfreude over this? No. “Disgust” is more like it, even though the word barely scratches the surface of the emotions a lot of us are feeling over what’s happened over the last two months.

Ok, President Obama. Rant over. You can now go back to eating your waffle.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

15 Responses to “Brit media figures out what the American media refuses to acknowledge”

Comments

  1. Carlos says:

    Dear Mr. President,

    We are not trying to do community organization here, we are trying to renew the tie that binds with all our allies that GW so gallantly dismissed for eight years. Please try to treat those of equal stature to you in their own countries with the respect you would ask, nay, demand, instead of treating them like some bank schmuck you’re trying to strongarm into giving loans to groups of people who couldn’t pay for a parking space, let alone a house.

    Trust me. It will be a lot easier to earn their trust and respect (which is what all the Democrats say they want from all foreign nations) if you treat them with respect and give them no reason not to trust you.

  2. DavidL says:

    It is not BO’s fault. He is too busy with the party life, campaign stops and forums, to bother with the pesky problems of governing. After he is not paying for the Wagyu steak on which he feasts, and it is not his 401K which is crashing.

  3. Russ says:

    I think Comrade Obama’s snubb of the British PM was intentional. I bet it will be much diffrent when a Muslim ( terrorist supporting) leader visits.

  4. Rovin says:

    It looks like multi-tasking in the Obama administration is above their paygrade. Maybe if Obama would take Pelosi’s permanently installed earpiece out, he might try to think for himself? Nah. The fact that Obama chose to surround himself with a slew of “Clinton has-beens” with a peanut farmers mentality, explains why the man is fatigued. Take a failed community organizer, add some “hope and change”, pour into a daranged media bowl of conceit, (throw in a couple of trillon in unfunded social policy), pay more attention to your Wednesday night party friends than foreign dignitaries, bake and serve to every American that’s willing to swallow this crap—and don’t forget to tax it!

  5. Nina says:

    He can quit any time. Unemployment benefits are at all time high(maybe that was his plan all along…) and we will gladly accept his resignation.

  6. BT in SA says:

    Valerie Jarret told Tom Brokaw that obama would be ready to “rule” on day one. Link.

  7. Severian says:

    C’mon, give the guy a break. It’s not his fault, his Blackberry was uncharged, so no one could text him and tell him what to do!

  8. NC Cop says:

    Oooooo, you criticized Obama!! Gibbs will be trashing you during the next press conference and Al Sharpton will be camping outside your homes calling you all RACISTS!!

    How else can Obama keep everyone’s attention away from the fact that this guy is in way over his head….and we’ll all pay the price for it.

  9. btenney says:

    Obama is really in over his head, as Robert Gibbs insists on pointing out.

  10. Great White Rat says:

    Poor widdle Baracky….so he gets cranky and out of sorts and is rude to his visitors when he doesn’t get his nap time?

    If he can’t handle the stress now, imagine what would happen if he ever gets that 3am phone call.

  11. Rovin says:

    If he can’t handle the stress now, imagine what would happen if he ever gets that 3am phone call.

    Given his current foreign policy of appeasement and snubbing our closest allies, this “call” may be coming soon White Rat. All this while he plans to cut the defense budget by 20% to help fund his trillion dollar social programs.