The Bush deficit vs. the Obama deficit

Posted by: ST on March 25, 2009 at 1:46 am

Any questions?

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

7 Responses to “The Bush deficit vs. the Obama deficit”

Comments

  1. camojack says:

    They say a picture is worth a thousand words.

    In this case, that’s how many billion per word? :-w

  2. Donna J says:

    Oh he’ll cut the deficit in half by the end of his first (and hopefully only) term, but only after he quadruples it first! And that’s STILL more than the Bush deficit when all is said and done!

    The whole thing is such a monstrous mess. If I’m in debt up to my eyeballs the last thing I’d do is go out and put four times that amount on a credit card. If I have to cut back, why can’t the government?

  3. NC Cop says:

    No, no ,no, don’t you get it? Obama HAS to spend this much money becuase of what Bush did. See? It’s not really Obama’s fault that he HAS to spend all this money, it’s Bush’s fault.

    Gosh, did you guys not get your order of Kool Aid today or what?

  4. Lorica says:

    Just more lies coming from the liars on the left. They lied about everything regarding Barack and now they enable him to continue to perpetuate more lies to cover the original lies that were told.

    This kids is the reason you should never lie. It will only get you stuck in Iraq I mean in a bad budget situation. – Lorica

  5. Brontefan says:

    Unless we spend our way into oblivion–and the country is in such a desperate crisis that people are terrified–how else will OB sell his socialist ideology? I never saw a man more determined to destroy this country. And he is having a grand ol’ time while doing it. I agree with Mark Levin: lets send all our elected officials on a six month vacation–fly them anywhere–just keep them from shredding the Constitution. Did anyone see Giethner trying to answer WHERE in the US Constitution he gets the power to interfere with private companies?

  6. yo says:

    The leftards push the idiocy that because republicans had 400 billion dollar deficits, they can’t be against 2 trillion dollar deficits. What idiocy. Only someone like Olbermann could push a story so idiotic.

    On the other hand, the democrats constantly told us how “dangerous” the bush deficits were, and now try to stick us with trillions of their own, and don’t think we should think a thing about it.

    It’s hard to comprehend how people could fall for their rhetoric.[-(