Robert Gibbs: Obama uses a teleprompter. So what?

Posted by: ST on March 27, 2009 at 6:23 pm

The Washington Post recently sat down to interview Obama spox Robert Gibbs, and in the middle of it the issue of Obama’s use of a teleprompter came up:

MS. [LOIS] ROMANO: The teleprompter changed last night.

MR. GIBBS: Mm-hmm.

MS. ROMANO: What was that about that? It’s a big jumbotron now.

MR. GIBBS: You know can I tell you this?

MS. ROMANO: Yes.

MR. GIBBS: I am absolutely amazed that anybody in America cares about who the President picks at a news conference or the mechanism by which he reads his prepared remarks. You know, I guess America is a wonderful country.

MS. ROMANO: You’re saying this is all Washington Beltway stuff?

MR. GIBBS: I don’t even know if it’s that. I don’t think I should implicate the many people that live in Washington.

MR. GIBBS: No, I you know, I don’t think the President let me just say this: My historical research has demonstrated that the President is not the first to use prepared remarks nor the first to use a teleprompter.

MR. GIBBS: I think using the teleprompter last night was a way of talking directly to the American people.

I have joked that from now on, just so the President we could liven things up, that we’re actually going to remove every third word, sort of like a Madlib, and he could add in there what he wants to tell people so that there would be a little bit more excitement in it.

MR. GIBBS: The President thought it was a good idea.

But doesn’t he do that already?

Seriously, this is not an “issue” by any means, but if Gibbs wants to know why certain folks like to tease Obama and Democrats who have fawned for years over his eloquence, it’s because we had to sit back for eight years and deal with all the silly cracks and cruel criticisms over Bush’s stumbling over his words ever so often, as his lack of ability to give a killer speech was “proof” of his “stupidity.” How many “Bushisms” lists did we see over the course of the last eight years? Too many to count. So Gibbs should consider this a bit of payback to those same Democrats, because Obama has not only shown that he has a gift for gaffes as well, but he’s demonstrated an ability to stumble over his own words when he goes off script. Is this “proof” of Obama’s “stupidity,” too? Or, unlike Bush, does this just make him “more human”?

There’s nothing wrong with the use of the teleprompter in and of itself, as many presidents have utilized them over the years, but the fact that our “brilliant” President relies on it more heavily that most presidents in modern history, as per The Politico and the Obama-adoring New York Times – which reported that Obama “uses them for everyday routine announcements, and even for the opening statement at his news conference,” and went on to say that “while some of his predecessors liked to extemporize, Mr. Obama prefers the message to be just so” – well, Gibbs honestly didn’t expect Obama’s critics to let pass by without comment the fact that Obama’s over-reliance on the teleprompter is probably a big factor in why he fumbles over his words so often, did he?

Oh wait, I forgot … we must “give him time” to let his plans “work,” to let him get used to the office, its responsiblities, and the sheer volume of speeches, comments, and statements he has to give. My bad …

RSS feed for comments on this post.

8 Responses to “Robert Gibbs: Obama uses a teleprompter. So what?”

Comments

  1. MAS1916 says:

    Obama is extremely well managed. He is managed by the Labor and Teachers Unions, George Soros, ACORN and all the other leftwing fringe groups. They want their messenger perfect. Whenever He opens His mouth off prompter, he fouls something up. The lefties want their message perfect and the teleprompter ensures it.

    Obama is a primarily a performer. The teleprompter is just a tool.

  2. Brian says:

    That and the fact that without the teleprompter, he can’t speak to save his soul. As you mentioned, he was held up as the best-spoken candidate in modern history, he was “articulate” (and “clean”, as Biden once called him). In short, he was Shakespeare, Churchill, and JFK rolled into one. He falls short of that mark by a country mile when you remove the teleprompter.

    If I want to listen to “uhms” and “ahs” every third word, I’ll go listen to a third-grade debate or something. I’m sure they’d make a lot more sense than he does.

  3. MuscleDaddy says:

    “Or, unlike Bush, does this just make him “more human”?”

    Hmmm…. Obama… Human…

    …Nope, can’t make it work.

    – MuscleDaddy

  4. Jim Treacher says:

    Somebody should remind Gibbs of his boss’s official response to Palin’s acceptance speech:

    “The speech that Governor Palin gave was well delivered, but it was written by George Bush’s speechwriter and sounds exactly like the same divisive, partisan attacks we’ve heard from George Bush for the last eight years.”

  5. Tom TB says:

    I don’t think the Obama could nail two 2x4s together without outside help.

  6. Glenn Cassel AMH1(AW) USN RET says:

    Does gibbs actually use his brain?

  7. Carlos says:

    Gibbs has a brain? I know his boss does, ’cause it’s treacherous and hidden by a very dark agenda, but Gibbs? I don’t think so.

  8. Ed says:

    Obama is a primarily a performer. The teleprompter is just a tool.

    As is Obama.

    Gibbs is an odd one, as well; he seems accommodating, but there is a bit of a mean streak in there. He tries to come across with “Aw, heck, I’m just a real lucky fella to be here talkin’ for the savior, uh, I mean, ‘President Obama’,” but I often imagine him working the puppet’s strings while trying to remain innocuous. He reminds me of Lavrenti Beria. I wonder how long he can bear the lie while smiling…