The murder of partial birth abortion doctor George Tiller

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on May 31, 2009 at 8:20 pm

As I’m sure you’ve heard by now, partial birth abortion doctor George Tiller has been murdered:

(CNN) — Dr. George Tiller, whose Kansas women’s clinic was the epicenter of the state’s battles over abortion for nearly two decades, was shot and killed at his church Sunday morning, his family said.

Tiller, 67, was fatally shot shortly after 10 a.m. Sunday at Reformation Lutheran Church, Wichita police said.

Sunday afternoon, authorities took a man into custody near Kansas City after stopping a car that matched a description of the killer’s getaway vehicle, according to sheriff’s deputies in Johnson County, Kansas. No charges had been filed and a motive for the killing was not immediately known.

Witnesses provided a license number for a powder-blue Ford Taurus they said the killer used to speed away from the church, police spokesman Gordon Bassham said.

Tiller was one of the few U.S. physicians who still performed late-term abortions. In 1993, he was shot and wounded through both arms outside his Wichita clinic. Shelley Shannon, an ardent foe of abortion, was convicted of attempted murder in the shooting and is currently serving a 20-year sentence in federal prison.

Because Tiller was a target of pro-lifers for decades, it is being assumed – mostly by the left – that his murder was committed by a pro-life “Christianist.” Even President Obama, unsurprisingly, has jumped on this bandwagon:

WICHITA, Kansas – President Obama said this afternoon that he was “shocked and outraged” by the killing of abortion doctor George Tiller, who was shot while attending church in east Wichita.

Wichita Deputy Police Chief Tom Stolz said at a news conference late this afternoon that a suspect in the shooting was in custody and on his way back to Wichita.

“However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence,” the president said in a statement issued by the White House.

The suspect is in custody:

Deputy Chief Tom Stolz w/ Wichita Police Dept. says Dr. Tiller died of a single gunshot wound. A 51-year-old suspect is in custody in Johnson County. Police say the suspect was arrested without incident after a traffic stop.

Stolz says formal charges are expected Monday. Suspect faces one count of murder, two counts of aggravated assault. Detective says suspect threatened two others who tried to keep him from leaving the area.

The suspect, whose name will not be released until formally charged, is on his way back to Wichita.

First things first, whether or not the person who murdered Tiller was a “pro-life Christianist” or not, I join other conservative bloggers who are stating without hesitation that Tiller’s murderer deserves to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, and that the death penalty should be on the table. Even if he/she was/is a “pro-life Christianist,” this isn’t the wild, wild West anymore, and this isn’t the way that a civilized society resolves its differences. As readers of this blog know very well from my prior writings on the topic, I am strongly anti-abortion, but I also strongly condemn acts of violence against abortion providers. The way to go about changing minds on abortion is not by killing its providers. It’s by educating people on what abortion actually is, what it involves, and why most women have them. Changing enough minds on the issue could make it so that one day abortions are so unpopular that it would be a mere formality to ban the practice. And yes, I know that day is a long way off.

That said, it should be no surprise to anyone the despicable displays being shown by pro-abortion forces on the left, trying to broad brush the entire pro-life movement for the actions of a few fringe nuts in the past – and possibily the present (again, we don’t yet know the motivations for the murder). Andrew Sullivan, unsurprisingly, has been a ringleader in all this by using the “Christianist” label, and blaming Bill O’Reilly for the murder of Tiller. Donald Douglas verbally slaps him, and other opportunistic lefties, down here.

In addition to conservatives across the blogosophere, various pro-life groups have issued statements condemning the murder, but that hasn’t stopped even “respectable” leftists from using the broadbrush, and in the process characterizing this murder as an act of “domestic terrorism” (more here).

No doubt, pro-abortionists will use (and are in fact already are using) the murder of Tiller in order to put a smiley face on the practice of abortion and the doctors who provide them, in hopes of continuing to advance the idea that abortions are “ok” to have and should remain “legal.” But in the middle of all the drama surrounding Tiller’s murder, and the inevitable mainstream media/left wing bloggers/columnists mass broad condemnations of the pro-life movement for the actions of a few disturbed individuals, it shouldn’t be ignored that Tiller was not just an abortion provider – he was one of the few doctors who performed abortion after the 21st week. LaShawn Barber reminds everyone in detail of what the process of PBA actually involves, and notes how Tiller once said of PBAs:

He’d spoken at a National Education Association conference, and pro-life group Students for Life of America secretly videotaped him talking about babies slipping out of the womb alive during abortions. He called this “sloppy medicine.”

No, Tiller certainly did not deserve to be gunned down, but he doesn’t deserve the “hero” label that so many on the left are giving him for the “quality health services he provided for women across the country.” Dr. Tiller performed the following procedure on third trimester babies:

Under the Intact D&X method, the largest part of the fetus (the head) is reduced in diameter to allow vaginal passage. According to the American Medical Association, this procedure has four main elements.[7] First, the cervix is dilated. Second, the fetus is positioned for a footling breech. Third, the fetus is partially pulled out, starting with the feet, as far as the neck. Fourth, the brain and material inside the skull is evacuated, so that a dead but otherwise intact fetus can be delivered via the vagina.

Usually, preliminary procedures are performed over a period of two to three days, to gradually dilate the cervix using laminaria tents (sticks of seaweed which absorb fluid and swell). Sometimes drugs such as pitocin, a synthetic form of oxytocin, are used to induce labor. Once the cervix is sufficiently dilated, the doctor uses an ultrasound and forceps to grasp the fetus’ leg. The fetus is turned to a breech position, if necessary, and the doctor pulls one or both legs out of the birth canal, causing what is referred to by some people as the ‘partial birth’ of the fetus. The doctor subsequently extracts the rest of the fetus, usually without the aid of forceps, leaving only the head still inside the birth canal. An incision is made at the base of the skull, scissors are inserted into the incision and opened to widen the opening,[8] and then a suction catheter is inserted into the opening. The brain is suctioned out, which causes the skull to collapse and allows the fetus to pass more easily through the birth canal. The placenta is removed and the uterine wall is vacuum aspirated using a cannula.[9]

That procedure can be described many ways, but a “quality health service” is not one of them. Dr. Tiller can be called many things, but a “hero” is not most definitely not one of them. Also, let’s not forget that, in spite of the left’s assertions on why women have partial birth abortions, the myth of “life of the mother” was debunked long ago.

The chips will fall where they will with this murder, and hopefully the killer will get what he deserves when all is said and done. But just because Tiller’s murder may have been due to the type of abortions he performed doesn’t mean that that the position that all unborn babies should be protected is wrong and shouldn’t be advanced. There are kooks on both sides of the aisle. Does the left think that because the eco-terrorist movement is alive and well (see FBI: Eco-Terrorism Remains No. 1 Domestic Terror Threat) means that the green agenda isn’t a worthy one? No, they don’t, and they don’t appreciate it when anyone on the right tries to make such an argument. By the same token, the left shouldn’t use the isolated acts of fringe abortion opponents to broad brush the pro-life movement on the whole, but they will – perhaps because they know that the tide is turning on the issue of abortion, and as a result they’ll have to use whatever excuses they can to continue to justify its practice, including continued deception on both the procedures themselves and why they’re done.

May justice be served – both for Tiller’s murderer, and for the precious unborn.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

17 Responses to “The murder of partial birth abortion doctor George Tiller”

Comments

  1. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    Obama finally has his Reichstag fire. The only question is how big and how fast the coming crackdown on civil rights will be.

  2. john says:

    I concur with your analysis. The Fifth Commandment forbids all murders. Of course it was wrong to kill Tiller. Under no circumstances could this act ever be justified. It cries to heaven for vengeance. Equally it must be stated that Tiller was a MURDERER who butchered the innocent unborn child in the womb. Certainly he was no hero. He was a cool calculating killer who profited from his actions. He was part of a new modern holocaust which slaughters the unborn.
    Interestingly whilst Obama rightly condemned the murder he expressed no sympathy for the unborn who were deprived of their right to life.

  3. DaveinPhoenix says:

    Lord, I’m sorry as can be for saying this, but I don’t personally give a damn about this creep getting killed. With countless forms of birth control available to everyone, the irresponsible are rewarded time and time again (2,000,000 times a year actually) with the answer to their irresponsibility: abortion. And now this creep who got killed will be the justification for the next round of assaults on our liberties: even more gun control

  4. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    Speaking of Nazis, I am waiting for abortionists to compose their own version of the Horst Wessel Song for Tiller. Never let a good crisis go to waste!

  5. Carlos says:

    The guy can call himself a Christian all he wants, and I’m sure Tiller called himself a “Christian”, also. Thank God (literally) I’m not the one who will judge their salvations, but on the surface at least neither exhibited the restraint of their call to Christ. Just because Tiller killed more humans than the arrested killer doesn’t make him “more” guilty, just equally so.

    But I’m equally sure this will be used as a call to restrict the practice of Christianity, in spite of the Constitution (drawn up, for the most part, by Christians who had a healthy respect for the practices of non-believers.)

  6. Hawkins says:

    I believe per the new speech codes it’s not “domestic terrorism” but rather “domestic man caused disaster”

  7. Greg says:

    Violence with the intent of influencing the behavior of others is terrorism. Shooting the doctor was not only murder, it was terrorism.

  8. Lorica says:

    You do have to wonder just what sort of reaction this man is getting now that he stands before the King of kings and the Lord of lords. I just pray that his soul was saved, even tho his intellect was completely in error. – Lorica

  9. Carlos says:

    No, Greg, it’s only “domestic man-caused disaster” when you’re talking practioners of the religion of peace attacking evil Americans. It’s terrorism whenever any sacred rite of liberalism is attacked, either physically (as in this case) or verbally.

  10. Julian from Placitas says:

    Dear Gentle Readers,

    “However profound our differences as Americans over difficult issues such as abortion, they cannot be resolved by heinous acts of violence,” the president said in a statement issued by the White House.

    I will bet that “heinous acts of violence” is not a phrase that the president has ever associated with late-term (read, post-birth) abortions.

    Actually, had prominent pro-choice advocates more prominently used that phrase in association with those abortions, one of the consequences may have been that the doctor would not have been murdered yesterday.

    All of this said, I commiserate with his wife and other loved ones. She is I am sure in great pain and suffering grievously. No murder is justified.

  11. Leslie says:

    Brava, ST. Beautifully balanced, heartfelt analysis of the event.

  12. Mark says:

    Considering abortion is one of the most divisive moral and political subjects in the U.S., Newsy does a good job here of providing insightful news perspectives from different sides on this recent controversial and tragic event.

    Obviously, it would be good if those on both sides of this issue could reach some common ground, but like some things, it doesn’t appear this will happen for quite some time in this country.

  13. Trish says:

    Julian–well said.

    Mark–how can there possibly be common ground between those who consider abortion murder and those who call it “a woman’s right to choose.” The right to choose murder?

    John–too true.

    The real tragedy here is that it is going to make someone who murdered countless children into a martyr.

  14. forest hunter says:

    The real tragedy here is that it is going to make someone who murdered countless children into a martyr.

    Perhaps an even greater tragedy will be that the young man who was murdered in front of the recruitment office by another worthless stinkin POS muzzie puke, will not be!

    I am thoroughly disgusted by this washed up media…..time to truly consider hanging a few of these corrupt and villainous traitors! STG!

  15. Angel says:

    Going my other comments, people are not aware of what partial birth abortion is. First I want to say, I am not for or against abortions, EARLY TERM, but this doctor performed partial birth abortions, where the baby is alive, full-term and murdered. It still does not mean he deserves to be murdered. Do some checking, know what you are commenting on.

  16. tom reynolds says:

    I have read the description of “Partial Birth Abortion” before. Any loving,caring person who reads it and still thinks that this is acceptable really needs to question how they arrive at decisions on anything else. I might suggest that the mother must do some final step in the murder of her child. maybe video tape it for her trophy wall in the den to be shown to the other members of her family.