Media critic. Invader of
SJW safe spaces.
Election 2016: Keith Ellison: ‘I would love to see Elizabeth Warren’ run
Here is some guidance on covering the NYC mosque story, with assists from Chad Roedemeier in the NYC bureau and Terry Hunt in Washington:
1. We should continue to avoid the phrase “ground zero mosque” or “mosque at ground zero” on all platforms. (We’ve very rarely used this wording, except in slugs, though we sometimes see other news sources using the term.) The site of the proposed Islamic center and mosque is not at ground zero, but two blocks away in a busy commercial area. We should continue to say it’s “near” ground zero, or two blocks away.
WE WILL CHANGE OUR SLUG ON THIS STORY LATER TODAY from “BC-Ground Zero Mosque” to “BC-NYC Mosque.”
In short headlines, some ways to refer to the project include:
_ mosque 2 blocks from WTC site
_ Muslim (or Islamic) center near WTC site
_ mosque near ground zero
_ mosque near WTC site
We can refer to the project as a mosque, or as a proposed Islamic center that includes a mosque.
It may be useful in some stories to note that Muslim prayer services have been held since 2009 in the building that the new project will replace. The proposal is to create a new, larger Islamic community center that would include a mosque, a swimming pool, gym, auditorium and other facilities.
Hmm. Almost sounds like a Democrat talking point release. Anyway …
The biggest thing I got out of this news was not that they were going to stop calling something for what it was, but the fact that the AP has something called a “Standards Center” in the first place. Coulda fooled me.
Doug Powers has issued a call for people to come up with alternative terms the AP can use for the Space Formerly Known As The Ground Zero Mosque. Rush calls it the “Hamasque.” What are your ideas?