E-Mail 'WH wants to change "global warming" to "global climate disruption"' To A Friend

Email a copy of 'WH wants to change "global warming" to "global climate disruption"' to a friend

Loading ...

16 Responses to "WH wants to change “global warming” to “global climate disruption”"

Warren Crocker Herrick says:

September 17, 2010 at 12:02 am

Even more of the opportunistic left’s quest for power and control. What’s really disappointing is how many seemingly sane and intelligent people never question them. Most people don’t even know who their local representatives are. This is what we’re fighting against. Voter turnout in Vermont’s recent primary was 23% of eligible and it was called “high”.
Sefton says:

September 17, 2010 at 12:07 am

Actually, it went from “global warming” to “climate change”. Now it’s “global climate disruption”.
They had to change the “warming” part because global cooling was integral in some scientific studies – so that’s no good.
Then “climate change” was the term of the month, but it has too much of an obvious association to climate in general – climate always changes . . . damn, we need something more psychologically intimidating.
How about “global climate disruption”? Yeah, that’s the ominous, threatening tag we’re looking for to move our agenda off the back burner.
Next up – “Global Climate Annihilation Of The Entire Human Race” (or something)
ShiftyJ says:

September 17, 2010 at 2:42 am

I wonder if they call the massive hit we’re going to give them in November an inverted victory.
Mary W says:

September 17, 2010 at 4:18 am

Let’s not forget “a sorry band of men” for radical Islamist terrorists. No wonder the economy is sinking faster than New Orleans. Our leaders are spending all their time trying to think up euphemisms to deceive the American people instead of working to fix the country’s problems.

I wonder how much time was spent ‘creating’ the new Dem logo – D for d’uh. They’re falling all over themselves patting each other on the back for this ‘brilliant’ new face of the D party.
WH wants to change “global warming” to “global climate disruption … | Climate Change History Explore and Learn says:

September 17, 2010 at 4:50 am

[…] the rest here: WH wants to change “global warming” to “global climate disruption … This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged climate-change, even-hate, global-climate, […]
CZ says:

September 17, 2010 at 6:54 am

“global climate disruption” sounds so temporary.

Maybe they finally get it.
Jo says:

September 17, 2010 at 7:26 am

“Okay, Fellow Dems, now this whole global warming thing hasn’t sold and the evil planet-hating rightwing nutjobs claim we can’t prove it so let’s go with ‘Global Climate Disruption’, a term that’s more vague and easier to swallow and since it’s got three words instead of two, by the time our base gets to the end of it they’ll believe it because it sounds big and has no real basis in fact. And then let’s start working on getting rid of that term ‘jackass’ for our party–so unseemly. Let’s call ourselves ‘The Burden Carrying Service Party’, again, a long, senseless and confusing term that will sell and sound less insulting and reinforce that notion that we are all about the people, especially the people on generational welfare and the unions. Okay, gang: GO SPREAD THE WORD and then we can easily shove through Cap and Tax with no muss or fuss.”
Kate says:

September 17, 2010 at 8:17 am

…it does sound like a temporary inconvenience. After the disruption, things will just go back to “normal”???

Reminds me of the Wizard of Oz…pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. In this case, the man making these silly speeches to a bunch of people who are in the tank with him for man-made global destruction (which I think is what he really wanted to say).
david foster says:

September 17, 2010 at 8:18 am

Lots more about John Holdren and his views here.
Zippy says:

September 17, 2010 at 8:39 am

The WH is now officially known as Anti-American disruptive anti-freedom ‘we know better than you about everything don’t question us’ antagonists.
Carlos says:

September 17, 2010 at 10:27 am

“If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.”

That is a total non sequiter because the “education” sponsored by the state the last few decades IS ignorance.

And unreasonably expensive.
Bill Fabrizio says:

September 17, 2010 at 10:55 am

I will buy into the term “global climate disruption” when the libs and media buy into the term “America’s prosperity disruption” as the nomenclature for the “man caused disaster’s” presidency!
DavidL says:

September 17, 2010 at 12:45 pm

Mr. Obama meet the weather.
UK Investigation into Climate Change Science, Possible Misconduct… Close Scrutiny in Britain by MPs on ClimateGate Scandal… Are AGW Claims “Science” or “Literature”? Looking Like “Literature” « Frugal says:

September 17, 2010 at 12:45 pm

[…] stuff: Founding Bloggers: Climate Panel Admits They Can’t Defend Their Work Sister Toldjah: WH wants to change “global warming” to “global climate disruption” The Powers That Be: This Week’s ‘Al Gore Jr. Award for Environmental Hypocrisy’ Goes To… […]
nina says:

September 17, 2010 at 4:01 pm

He is the idiot along with globalists who believes we should eliminate 80% of the world population. He should volunteer.:d
MissJean says:

September 18, 2010 at 10:31 am

Just today, via Bob Parks, I read that the energy czar wants to mandate the energy efficiency of appliances. I just paid one arm and 5/8 of a leg for a new Energy Star washing machine after my $50 used machine bit the suds. It wasn’t even a top-end model with bells and whistles.

I can only imagine the tax-payer subsidies for the impoverished – or the way that Big Government will take landlords to the cleaners!

Comments are closed.