UK’s Daniel Hannan: US dangerously close to going the way of Europe

Still don’t understand how this guy could have even for as second supported Barack Obama’s candidacy over John McCain’s, but I’m certainly thankful that he’s since seen the light. One of the UK’s most dynamic politicos wrote in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal about how America is dangerously going the way of Europe – and that’s good for no one but controlling, liberal elite power-hungry types (via Cubachi):

My guess is that, if anything, Obama would verbalize his ideology using the same vocabulary that Eurocrats do. He would say he wants a fairer America, a more tolerant America, a less arrogant America, a more engaged America. When you prize away the clichΓ©, what these phrases amount to are higher taxes, less patriotism, a bigger role for state bureaucracies, and a transfer of sovereignty to global institutions.

He is not pursuing a set of random initiatives but a program of comprehensive Europeanization: European health care, European welfare, European carbon taxes, European day care, European college education, even a European foreign policy, based on engagement with supranational technocracies, nuclear disarmament and a reluctance to deploy forces overseas.

[…]

I don’t doubt the sincerity of those Americans who want to copy the European model. A few may be snobs who wear their euro-enthusiasm as a badge of sophistication. But most genuinely believe that making their country less American and more like the rest of the world would make it more comfortable and peaceable.

All right, growth would be slower, but the quality of life might improve. All right, taxes would be higher, but workers need no longer fear sickness or unemployment. All right, the U.S. would no longer be the world’s superpower, but perhaps that would make it more popular. Is a European future truly so terrible?

Yes. I have been an elected member of the European Parliament for 11 years. I have seen firsthand what the European political model means.

The critical difference between the American and European unions has to do with the location of power. The U.S. was founded on what we might loosely call the Jeffersonian ideal: the notion that decisions should be taken as closely as possible to the people they affect. The European Union was based on precisely the opposite ideal. Article One of its foundational treaty commits its nations to establish “an ever-closer union.”

Make sure to read the whole thing, and then marvel at how – unfortunately – there are so few politicos on this side of the pond who are willing to boldly and fearlessly step up and speak the truth about the direction this country is headed under the Socialist-esque “leadership” of our celebrity President.

Comments are closed.