Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is a race-baiting idiot… and a liar

Posted by: Phineas on March 22, 2012 at 12:02 pm

**Posted by Phineas

Would you believe...?

But then, she’s a Democratic member of Congress and Chair of the Democratic National Committee, so it isn’t really surprising. What is somewhat surprising (1), though, is that she would lie about her race-baiting in a way that’s easily falsifiable.

You see, a while back, Congresswoman Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL) said that the Republicans, because they favor requiring ID to vote, wanted to take the nation back to the days of Jim Crow. Then, just a day or so ago, she claimed to a crew from MRCTV that she had never said any such thing. (2)

Really. She said that.

So, not only is she either ignorant of or simply ignoring the Democrat Party’s dirty record on race; whether done deliberately or born of stupidity, she then tells a lie that is easily proven a lie. She not only spits in the faces of anyone concerned about the integrity of our elections, she denies ever doing it while wondering where the saliva you’re wiping off came from.

I feel mildly sorry for Democrats, because we had to suffer through Michael Steele, and I know what those face-palm moments feel like. But only very mildly, because their “leaders” have done a lot of harm to the country, and that sympathy is tempered -almost quashed out of existence- by a strong desire that they keep this tool in charge through November. She’ll be a great help — to our side. As a gaffe-machine, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is Joe Biden without the hair plugs; she’ll make the jobs of Republican communication shops very easy. And, as Allen West pointed out, she is a mean-spirited, vile harridan without any sense of honor or shame, making her continued public humiliation a patriotic duty. (3)

In fact, she’s perfect for the Democrats. Monumentally dumb and an open harpy. I wish her a long tenure in her job.

RELATED: More Democratic stupidity (but I repeat myself) from Jimmy. Allahpundit is amused. And snarky analysis from Moe Lane, who always throws the snark in for free.

Footnotes:
(1) Until one remembers how many members of Congress, on a bipartisan basis, forget about the deadly combination of handheld recorders and the Internet.
(2) My reaction on hearing the news last night.
(3) Perhaps mean-spirited and vile of me, too, but, hey, I’m just one of those people who want to bring back Jim Crow and cross burnings, you know?

(Crossposted at Public Secrets)

RSS feed for comments on this post.

23 Responses to “Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is a race-baiting idiot… and a liar”

Comments

  1. Carlos says:

    She doesn’t have hair plugs? Well, whaddayaknow?

    Integrity? It isn’t found in her dictionary. She would do well in a Klingon government structure, and does even better in a socialist/communist government like the one we’ve got now.

  2. Sefton says:

    Every time I see this woman being interviewed on Fox News (rather, spilling her incredulously idiotic lies) I find myself wondering how the heck those anchors can sit there calmly and act like she’s not the dimwitted moron she is.

    There’s no way I could be that polite. I’d pause after one of her typical regurgitated, nonsensical talking points and ask her point blank “Have you taken your meds today, Debbie? No sane person could honestly utter what you just said. That’s classic Looney Tunes, Daffy Duck doing the flips stuff right there.”

    Let’s keep putting her on. She’s a gift.

  3. Kate says:

    Lol…she looks like she is off her meds in that pic! And truly any one who comes on TV and defends Obama has that hollow sound to their voice, like they practiced it over and over again and have convinced themselves that it has to be true.

    Democratic Party indoctrination at it’s worst….one thing they can’t understand about the Republican Primary where ideas and plans are discussed versus emotions and superficiality.

  4. Carlos says:

    There was a time in this country not all that long ago that DWS wouldn’t be making statements like she does in defense of her boss because he would either not be in this country or would have been in jail because he’s a communist. Back then it was just assumed that one would not, could not try to defend the indefensible.

    Which is what she and her boss both are: indefensible.

    The day she makes a lick of sense with anything she says political will be a red-letter day in my book.

  5. Mitch says:

    Were it not for the Democratic left wing press that supports them, these people would be seen on the National Stage as the idiots they are. It isn’t Congressmen like Wasserman-Shultz who are the problem. It is the left wing press that gives them a pass for being so stupid and making such stupid comments. Can you blame them for making bold, idiotic statements? Listen to NPR. Watch the idiots on Public Television. You would think you are in some other country. A communist country. But no. You are firmly rooted in the United States of America. And you are witnessing this once free country being taken over by Communism right in front of your eyes, courtesy of Obama and Holder and Soros and NPR and Public television and CNBC and CBS and ABC and CNN and God Help Us. I hope America wakes up soon.

  6. Drew the Infidel says:

    If you are going to lower yourself and insult the intelligence of others by telling a bald-faced lie, at least have the common decency to tell a lie that has some chance of being believable. What’s the old saying, “If you can’t fool them with facts, baffle them with B.S.”?

  7. Kate in MI says:

    strange- I thought the hair on the top of her head was a transplant from a somewhat lower area…looks like she should be wearing a pair of granny panties on her head…
    too bad i can’t quote Bill Maher and say she is the epitome of a dumb t**t, like he called Sarah Palin…:d

  8. CZ says:

    Little Debbie Nutbar

    LINK

  9. Ken66 says:

    How does requiring ID’s to vote have anything to do with Jim Crow? I thought that referred to the effort to keep slavery alive. I see no reason why we shoudn’t make an effort to keep illegal voters from hijacking elections.

  10. Kate says:

    @Ken….that’s the only recourse they have, lie, lie, lie and then soon enough the ignorant general public believes it must be true. Sal Alinsky’s method of public indoctrination.

    The only people who will truly be disenfranchised would be those who should not be voting. I think as a whole, if you are a college student living in another state and you are claimed as a dependent by your parents on their 1040, then your true address has to be the family home, not the location of your school. I think the main detractors in some of these cases are college students who need to get back to reality and see who is footing the bill for their education. If it’s all on Uncle Sam…well, then you have a conflict of interest in the voting booth, because you will vote your meal ticket.

    If you are a “poor” or “homeless” person, then you probably already have a valid state ID if you get any kind of public assistance. If you go to the DMV in in PA you will see a line of very happy folks with money orders in hand and the appropriate paperwork to get their state photo ID’s.

  11. Drew the Infidel says:

    And you also have to show a valid form of photo ID to enter the DOJ building.

  12. Tex says:

    Its obviously not John Kennedy’s or LBJ’s Democratic Party anymore. Looks like the Liberals lowered the bar for membership pretty darn low.

  13. Carlos says:

    @Tex: They’ve got membership standards? My gosh, whooda figured THAT one out?

  14. Jim McDonald says:

    You really have to wonder what strange vermin are banging around in that unattractive head. On some level, she must know what reality is, and what dementia she supports.

  15. Jiji says:

    Is anybody dead certain that DWS is a female? I’ve never known any female so ignorant but she (?) makes up for it by being ugly. Nope, not using any four letter words here.

  16. Mitch says:

    Yes, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is a total idiot, but she is representative of a number of Congressmen in their ranks. I am reminded of Congressman Hank Johnson, back in April of 2010. I laughed so hard I fell off my chair.

    Congressman Hank Johnson, Democrat, of Georgia’s 4th Congressional District, expressed his concern to Admiral Robert F. Willard during a House Armed Services Committee Hearing, that the U.S. territory of Guam might capsize if the U.S. stations an additional 8,000 marines and their families on the island.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&v=HE42-Uhlb3c&NR=1

  17. Carlos says:

    Johnson was worried about that because he’s been listing to port for so long, Mitch.

    BTW, is it just me or does DWS really look like some rodent that got a face shave? I mean, really! And I’m sure the only reason DWS didn’t defend Johnson for that comment was that some handler got to her first…

  18. Sefton says:

    Mitch – I was stationed in Guam for 18 months as a USN Photographer working in the Public Affairs Office. If they had called me to testify I could’ve reassured Johnson that I had on one occasion been assigned to photograph a meeting between the Commander Of Naval Forces Marianas and the Greek god Poseidon himself. They covered this specific topic and came to a consensus that the island would be safe from capsizing with the addition of Poseidon’s own deep sea counterbalances that could be repositioned and/or added to for additional personnel.

    But that’s classified information that I’d have to give in closed session.

  19. MissJean says:

    Is that a birthmark on her neck or is it a red penis tattoo?

  20. Mitch says:

    Proving once again that intelligence is not a mandatory requirement for Congressional office, Mr. Johnson is now running for a fourth term and will probably achieve it, so long as he stays away from conversations involving marine geology and atoll development. Then again, it’s a safe bet he doesn’t know what marine geology is.

  21. Mitch says:

    Sefton, the Poseidon comment was priceless. Kudos.

  22. Mitch says:

    Miss Jean, I know you meant it in good fun, but let’s not be that mean. It isn’t her complexion that’s the problem. It’s what she believes. We need to go after Democrats and Liberals for their stated beliefs, because that is where the difference lies between us and them.

  23. Paul A'Barge says:

    Apparently Wasserman Schultz has a husband and children. Can you imagine?

    Their suffering must be immense.

    Pray for them.