Heh: Did ABC News alter Clinton/Judd headline to escape Clinton affair jokes?

Posted by: ST on March 23, 2013 at 10:48 am

In scanning the headlines over at Memeorandum I came across this one, which immediately stood out – for obvious reasons to anyone familiar with former President Bill Clinton’s reputation for cheating on his wife and, in general, being an all around player:

Clinton headline

‘Reaches out’?

But when you click on the link to the story itself, you get this headline:

Updated headline

Updated headline.

And the URL reads this way: “bill-clinton-counseled-ashley-judd-senate-race-potential”

LOL …

I’d bet the headline edit to take out the words “reaches out” was intentional, because a whole lot of wisecracks could be made about that headline – given not only Clinton’s notorious history with women, but also considering Ashley Judd’s penchant for gushing over Democrat politicos to the point she sounds like a teenage girl with a crush. But even if it wasn’t, I suspect Daily Caller’s Jim Treacher is right on the mark here with his speculation as to why Bill Clinton wants two female Democrats (the other is Kentucky Sec. of State Alison Lundergan Grimes) to give it a go for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s seat in Kentucky:

Bill Clinton wants to see some girl-on-girl action in Kentucky[.]

Regarding the Senate race, I mean. Why, what did you think I was talking about?

Oh, I dunno …

Clinton and porn stars

Photo via Twitter – story:
‘Bill Clinton Poses With Porn Stars’ – ABC News 5/24/12

Some things never change.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

5 Responses to “Heh: Did ABC News alter Clinton/Judd headline to escape Clinton affair jokes?”

Comments

  1. Bill Clinton showed up at his office one day with a pair of women’s panties pinned to the shoulder of his coat. When someone asked what it was he replied, “It’s a patch. I’m trying to quit.”

  2. Carlos says:

    Don’t know if the pic is real or not (and don’t care), but it is a reminder that I’m surprised Clinton isn’t taking pics with anyone in the most pornographic administration ever. Like the Supreme said in his opinion, “I can’t define pornography but I know it when I see it,” and when I see the utterly disgusting economic and social filth emanating from this admin I know it’s pornographic and has absolutely no socially redeeming value…

  3. That supposed quote on porn is a paraphrase of Robert Frost on love, “Love is indefinable; I’ll know it when I see it.”

  4. Carlos says:

    Just FYI, Drew, here’s the exact quote and where it’s from:

    “I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [“hard-core pornography”]; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”

    —Justice Potter Stewart, concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964), regarding possible obscenity in “The Lovers.”