Corker: Watt heading Federal Housing Finance Agency = “fox guarding the hen house”

Posted by: ST on May 1, 2013 at 7:48 pm

As you’ve probably already heard, in the latest example of this administration’s naked cronyism (THIS WEEK), President Obama has nominated my Congressman in Name Only – Mel Watt – to oversee the Federal Housing Finance Agency.   The nomination has already sparked controversy, and for good reasons:

President Barack Obama nominated Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., as the new director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency Wednesday, but the president’s pick could face strong headwinds in his confirmation hearings as policymakers continue to bicker over the future of government mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

[...]

The Obama administration has struggled to find a replacement for Ed DeMarco who has served as the agency’s acting director since 2009. Obama previously nominated North Carolina Commissioner of Banks Joseph Smith for the post in 2011, but Smith later withdrew his bid after running into strong resistance from Republicans.

Watt has been in Congress for 20 years and is a longtime member of the House Financial Services Committee, which oversees housing issues. According to multiple sources, Watt was tapped to the FHFA’s next director because of his experience on the committee as well as his role in brokering the passage of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act.

“Mel has led efforts to rein in unscrupulous mortgage lenders and he’s fought to give more Americans in lower income neighborhoods access to affordable housing,” Obama said in press conference announcing Watt’s nomination Wednesday. “He knows better than anyone else what started the housing crisis and he knows what it’s going to take for responsible homeowners to fully recover.”

Uh, he most certainly does NOT “know better than anyone else” what started the housing crisis. Watt was part of the Democrat demagogue brigade during the Bush admin who pushed BACK on efforts to REFORM the oversight for Fannie and Freddie:

But Watt’s road to confirmation won’t be a smooth one. Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., released a statement Wednesday objecting to the nomination arguing that a new director should not be considered until there’s a clearer picture of the future of Fannie and Freddie, entities which have been under federal conservatorship since 2008 and now play an outsized role in the housing market, according to some critics.

“I could not be more disappointed in this nomination. This gives new meaning to the adage that the fox is guarding the hen house,” he said. “The debate around his nomination will illuminate for all Americans why Fannie and Freddie failed so miserably.”

Anthony Sanders, professor of real estate finance at George Mason University, similarly characterized the appointment calling it akin to having the cookie monster in charge of keeping Congress out of the proverbial cookie jar.

“Watt is part of the Congressional Black Caucus, which has been very active in promoting principal reduction and the easing or mortgage standards, basically recreating the same disaster we had last decade,” Sanders says. “This is a political appointment for a person who wants to put the foot on the gas again.”

Sanders also points out that some of Watt’s biggest donors are also some of the nation’s biggest banking interests, a factor that could trip him up at his confirmation hearings. According to OpenSecrets.org, among Watt’s top five contributors between 1992 and 2012, three (Bank of America, the American Bankers’ Association, and Wachovia) were in the banking industry.

Oops …

But hey, Watt’s black (a bonus when it comes to the admin’s “diversity issues”), and he’s from a state the Democrats would like to win back in 2016, so what they hey … why not nominate him to help oversee the industry he and his fellow liberals pushed to give home loans to risky people? #HeadDesk

RSS feed for comments on this post.

3 Responses to “Corker: Watt heading Federal Housing Finance Agency = “fox guarding the hen house””

Comments

  1. Carlos says:

    “There would be a substantial majority of white voters who would say that under no circumstances would they vote for an African American candidate,” Watt said Oct. 14, 2005 during a Washington hearing held by the National Commission on the Voting Rights Act.

    The Voting Rights Act should be expanded to “adjust districts to take [racially motivated voting] into account,” Watts said.

    Such voters “need to be factored out of the equation,” Watt said, because “I’ve got no use for them in the democratic process.”

    According to a contemporaneous report of the hearing published by the Cybercast News Service, Watt said that black voters — unlike whites — don’t have “an absolute commitment” to voting for a candidate based on race.

    “Black people have not had the luxury of being able to say, ‘Under no circumstances will I vote for a white candidate,’” Watt said in his remarks.

    This alone should disqualify him from holding any public office or government position. If he chooses to be a racist, that’s his business, but to be an active racist using what bully pulpit he can as a congressman to advance his racist beliefs is absolutely not acceptable.

  2. Lynne says:

    No matter how many emails I send to my Senators whenever I object to some policy or appointment, I usually never get a response…. I’m in California. :( But Carlos is right, this racist is absolutely unacceptable.

  3. Carlos says:

    Yeah, and he seems to forget that it was black organizations and people that torpedoed people like Cain, and the same organizations and people who tried to torpedo Thomas.

    And he doesn’t even get the hypocritical irony of his rants.