In Depth: The vile nature of militant #prochoice “feminism” – as described by one of their own

Posted by: ST on May 2, 2013 at 8:57 am

Got the below comment from someone calling themselves “Carla Clark” in the early a.m. hours today and wanted to share it with you.  Apparently Ms. Clark was highly upset at a post I wrote last week accurately and bluntly describing the shameful, bloody, pro-abortion legacies of our pro-choice President and his lapdog feminists, and she wanted to let me know just how stupidly wrong I was.   Ironically, her hateful, bigoted, callous remarks are a validation of everything I wrote.  It’s a shame she and other militant pro-aborts just like her are too hopelessly mindless to see that.  Bless her heart.

I would guesstimate that about 75% of the “feminist” movement is this rabidly, militantly, almost violently pro-choice. The rest are like I used to be when I was a liberal and advocated for abortion – I did so only in the abstract not pausing to think about what abortion really involved from moral, physical, emotional, and spiritual perspectives.   Once it hit me, the guilt came on fast and it’s something I still suffer from.  I thank God for making me see the light, because me being “on the other side” of this argument at one time in my life gave me the insight to know how to combat the various “rationales” thrown out there by so-called “women’s health advocates” like Carla.

I read disturbing opinions like Carla’s all the time at “feminist” blogs, on social media, magazines, watch them on TV, etc.  Have written about them here some. So for anyone who believes Carla is the “exception” the rule when it comes to militant pro-abortion “feminists” and their appalling cold-blooded nature when it comes to the unborn, and when it comes to women (and men) who dare to stray from self-righteous feminist dogma, let me warn you. She’s not an “exception.”  She is the norm.

But enough of my commentary. Below is Carla, unedited, unplugged, unhinged. The only thing I added was the bolded emphasis.   I urge people to pray for “women” like this who do a great disservice to young, impressionable women everywhere with this type of me-first, selfish, cruel, immoral behavior.  Carla and many other pro-aborts of her kind have a lot of blood on their hands.  Let’s pray for them that they one day wake up and see the light.  If not for their collective sake, then for the sakes of the millions of future unborn babies who deserve the same chance at life you, I, and the Carlas of the world were given.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Author : Carla Clark / Time Stamp: 5:29 AM ET 5/2/2013

“Hmm, it seems to me that someone who wants to kill women with the second deadliest known condition for women, WORLDWIDE, is the cold-hearted, bloody, murderer.

You are missing SEVERAL facts in your post, ‘sweetheart’. Not surprising, however. How many times have YOU investigated the lethal effects of childbirth and pregnancy, moron? I assure you, ANY woman who dies from abortion, has at least TEN MORE women dying from pregnancy and childbirth complications, EVERY FUCKING DAY. Coward.

Obama didn’t sign the “Partial Birth Abortion (it’s a MADE UP term, anti, which is why you’d have to put it into scare quotes)” act, because he, unlike certain other individuals, knows that there was already legislation to protect infants born alive. Besides, like the disgusting piece of excrement you are, you’ve just proven how WORTHLESS women’s lives are to you, but, of course, when it comes to your own, you’d be begging to have it saved. Late-term abortions are ONLY done for life-threatening and health reasons. You want to know HOW I know? Because I live in Canada, a country where there IS no legal restriction to abortion, but is medically regulated like any OTHER medical procedure. Abortion rates are comparable to rates of abortion in countries where it is ILLEGAL, the biggest difference? FEWER WOMEN DIE. Again, simply proving how this is NOT about saving lives.

The only Christian person is someone who is NOT a misogynist, blaming women for BIOLOGICAL ACCIDENTS, while completely ignoring any failing of a MAN’S biology. Jesus was not a misogynist, after all. The only CHRISTIAN person is someone who realizes that the biblical God has killed more fetuses than any living human in history. The only CHRISTIAN person is someone who doesn’t pick and choose parts of the bible they LIKE, then ignores all the rest. After all, Jesus said he didn’t come to wipe away all that came before, he said he came to FULFILL the promises that came before. Also, any passage involving a spontaneous or induced miscarriage, refers to people who ARE Pro-Abortion, meaning anti-choicers, like yourself. Besides, those passages only considered women and children PROPERTY of men, and women were simply considered more valuable property. Jesus does not like an idolator. And YOUR ilk are FETAL idolators. Obama saying God Bless You to Pro-Lifers would be a travesty of God’s Word.

Murder is a SPECIFIC term. It means unlawful killing with malice aforethought. Abortion is not illegal, it is not killing, it is not done with malice and it is not done with forethought. Just because we can’t currently charge YOU with murder, doesn’t mean we couldn’t, if Pro-’Life’ activism became illegal. You DO kill women, through pre-eclampsia, untreated cancers, etc. You DO do it with malice, because only women are treated as non-persons with no rights. And you DO do it with forethought, because you KNOW what effect your policies will have on women. You just refuse to acknowledge it, because then you would realize you are the TRUE murderers. Also, most Pro-Lifers I’ve met support illegal wars and the death penalty, and both sanctioned by the state, yet, somehow, you oppose state sanctioned abortion? Hypocrites. Besides that, do you think NO fetuses die during war? Or is it just that this is NOT about saving lives, but forcing women to be your livestock?

MORE women regret continuing their pregnancies than having an abortion. The same reason that women are afraid to come out about their regrets for giving birth, is the SAME reason they may feel regret over having had an abortion. Antis stigmatizing, shaming and marginalizing women who don’t want to become their livestock. There is a medically documented condition known as Post Partum Depression. There is NONE for abortion. Wanna know why? Because women who typically report feeling regret for an abortion are those who were COERCED into abortion (meaning it was ANTI not PRO-choicers), preexisting circumstances, harassment, shaming and stigmatization from antis, and/or a medical condition that is associated with PREGNANCY, not the actual abortion. WHOOPS.

Have your heads gone all splodey from the logic, yet? No? Here’s some MORE for ya.

The right to bodily autonomy applies to ALL people, not just men. If you want to give the right to exist at all costs (otherwise, it’s just an arbitrary distinction on YOUR part) to a fetus, a right that NO ONE ELSE HAS, you must give a right to exist at all costs to rapists, even during rape, you must give a right to exist at all costs to a person on death row, even during the commission of his crime, otherwise you’re just hypocrites and misogynists.

FINALLY, Kermit Gosnell was killing actual INFANTS, meaning those who had completely exited the woman’s body. Carhart, however? NO. Kermit Gosnell was JUST AS ANTI-CHOICE as YOU. If Planned Parenthood was the one that restricted access to contraception, abortion (health care), etc, and/or limited poor and immigrant women’s access to safe abortion, then, yes, they would have failed in their DUTY. However, last I checked, it was ANTI-choicers doing that, therefore, that DUTY fell to them. MORE proof that you people don’t care about saving lives OR women.

PS: I notice that most of the people agreeing with you on here, are men. As a woman, I am the only Pro-Choicer commenting on your blog. I think that means Anti-Choice women are the ones brainwashed into believing they are merely livestock. Pro-Choice women are the only ones with an independent thought. SO unsurprising.”

RSS feed for comments on this post.

12 Responses to “In Depth: The vile nature of militant #prochoice “feminism” – as described by one of their own”

Comments

  1. CZ says:

    My, my, my.

    I just love a lot of spunk in a gal.

    WIll you marry me sweet thang?

  2. alanstorm says:

    Lots of assertions, no evidence given. Except for her assertion of intellectual superiority – her post gives lots of evidence against that.

  3. Carlos says:

    Wow. Just wow. Unhinged doesn’t even come close.

    Besides nearly every “fact” quoted being wrong, her evident misogyny was amazing in and of itself.

    There’s no hint of it in her letter, but because of her evident politics I’d be willing to bet she’d even be happy with sharia law.

    It’s sad there are women like that who actually believe the garbage they spew.

  4. Lovelalola says:

    Geez, I had to stop at her errors in logic over the murder definition and how abortions happen. First, one does need malice or aforethought to be guilty of murder. Negligent homicide, for example, is one such case where neither malice nor aforethought are in the offing, and same with manslaughter. Both are murder charges (Murder 3 & 4 in my state, and class C & D felonies respectively).

    Finally, an abortion does happen with aforethought every single time. A woman plans for the abortion and goes to the clinic, all of which require planning. When aforethought does not exist, we refer to that as a “miscarriage.”

    Her venom is her biggest hindrance to persuasion. I myself and moderately prochoice. I don’t have a problem with medically regulated first term abortions. YMMV. My problem is with late term abortions, many of which most certainly do not occur as a result of medical emergencies. The women in Gosnell’s clinic, for example, were not suffering from medical emergencies. They were making a conscious decision to terminate pregnancies when the fetus was, in fact, viable. There is no question whether this is immoral. It is. It is infanticide.

  5. Carla, seek professional help.

  6. Phineas says:

    “Reactionary” doesn’t begin to describe her.

  7. John W says:

    Thank you for posting this. I now have a better understanding of what the term “bass-ackwards” means.

    I pity Carla. It can’t be fun to go through life with that kind of attitude.

  8. Zippy says:

    Her diatribe is offensive and disgusting.

    Hostile, aggressive, defensive and over the top …all of the things my libtarded cousins call ME when I disagree with them.

    Not only angry and hostile but any man who entrusts her with his man parts near any of her orifices might be endangered.

    LMAO @ CZ LOLOL!

  9. Simmeringtoad says:

    wow. Give that girl an A for the longest soul throw-up I’ve ever heard. Now we know.

  10. parentofed says:

    Incredibly, the commenter believes she’s using ‘logic’.

    BTW, I’ve been reading you quite a while and missed that you’re a former liberal who’s now a pro life woman. Me too.

  11. Zippy says:

    I think many of us were parentofed …then we grew up.

    Billy Joel said it best “I once believed in causes too and had my pointless point of view and found that just surviving was a noble fight …” (Angry Young Man) ..