Sen. Johnson (R-WI) suing over #Obamacare “special treatment” provisions for Congress

Posted by: ST on January 6, 2014 at 11:31 am
Obamacare

Just say no.

Via The Hill:

Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) is planning to sue the Obama administration over the federal contributions that lawmakers and their staffs get for health insurance.

A provision in the Affordable Care Act forces lawmakers and aides to buy insurance plans created by the healthcare law or sold on ObamaCare exchanges.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) said last year that the federal government would continue to help members of Congress and staffers offset the costs of those plans, as the government does for other federal employees.

But Republicans like Johnson say that policy gives lawmakers and congressional aides special treatment unavailable to others who have to seek insurance on ObamaCare exchanges.

Johnson said last week that he believes the OPM rule broke the law, and that he thinks the lawsuit can help rein in what he sees as a pattern of executive overreach from President Obama.

“The American people have an expectation — Wisconsinites have an expectation — that members of Congress should be subjected to the letter of the law just like they’re held to the letter of the law,” Johnson said, according to the Oshkosh Northwestern.

“In this case, members of Congress now are not being held to the letter of the law, and that creates an alienation. It creates a wedge between a member of Congress and their constituents.”

Intriguing. You can read the full opinion piece he wrote on this, which was published Sunday in the Wall Street Journal, here.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

One Response to “Sen. Johnson (R-WI) suing over #Obamacare “special treatment” provisions for Congress”

Comments

  1. Carlos says:

    With the nearly-total lack of any meaningful activity from Congress, and the fact that what action there is is usually aimed at destroying the middle class and/or transferring wealth to the privileged, Democrap/union rich and occasionally the poor, I find no reason whatsoever for any congresscritter to not only have any subsidies of any kind, but to even have a salary.

    But that’s from a disgruntled old man who remembers when politicians were held in higher esteem than used car salesmen. Not by much, but some.

    The discouraging thing about that is that, if you ask individual voters, it’s usually someone else’ congresscritter that should be tarred and feathered, not his/hers.