That sound you hear is NPR’s funding being flushed
**Posted by Phineas
During the 2008 campaign, it came out that then-Senator Obama held the average American in a sort of patronizing contempt:
And it’s not surprising then [small-town Americans] get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Now we have an example (as if we really needed it) of just how widespread this bigotry is among our progressive elites. Conservative filmmaker James O’Keefe (he of the ACORN exposΓ©s) has captured two National Public Radio executives trashing conservatives and Tea Party members, and not at all demurring at antisemitic statements, in order to impress what they thought were two donors from a Muslim Brotherhood front group that wants to spread sharia law. Watch and be enlightened:
And this is only part one. I can’t what to see what part two brings.
From the Daily Caller article:
βThe current Republican Party, particularly the Tea Party, is fanatically involved in peopleβs personal lives and very fundamental Christian β I wouldnβt even call it Christian. Itβs this weird evangelical kind of move,β declared [Ron] Schiller, the head of NPRβs nonprofit foundation, who last week announced his departure for the Aspen Institute.
In a new video released Tuesday morning by conservative filmmaker James OβKeefe, Schiller and Betsy Liley, NPRβs director of institutional giving, are seen meeting with two men who, unbeknownst to the NPR executives, are posing as members of a Muslim Brotherhood front group. The men, who identified themselves as Ibrahim Kasaam and Amir Malik from the fictitious Muslim Education Action Center (MEAC) Trust, met with Schiller and Liley at CafΓ© Milano, a well-known Georgetown restaurant, and explained their desire to give up to $5 million to NPR because, βthe Zionist coverage is quite substantial elsewhere.β
On the tapes, Schiller wastes little time before attacking conservatives. The Republican Party, Schiller says, has been βhijacked by this group.β The man posing as Malik finishes the sentence by adding, βthe radical, racist, Islamaphobic, Tea Party people.β Schiller agrees and intensifies the criticism, saying that the Tea Party people arenβt βjust Islamaphobic, but really xenophobic, I mean basically they are, they believe in sort of white, middle-America gun-toting. I mean, itβs scary. Theyβre seriously racist, racist people.β
Schiller goes on to describe liberals as more intelligent and informed than conservatives. βIn my personal opinion, liberals today might be more educated, fair and balanced than conservatives,β he said.
If you’re done gagging, you might want to read the rest.
It’s rather disquieting (to say the least) that media executives would be so anxious to solicit funds from self-proclaimed religious fascists whose stated goal is the destruction of the very system of constitutional liberty that makes a free press possible — while taking the money of taxpayers who would rightly object to seeing those same liberties replaced by sharia law.
But then, I’m just an uneducated, unfair, and unbalanced rube.
Ed Morrissey has some good analysis of this, including the suggestion that we help Schiller discover whether NPR will, as he believes, do better without federal funding. After this, I think a lot of congressmen and senators will be even more willing to assist.
One last thought: After listening to the bile spewed by Schiller and Liley, they have the nerve to call us bigots? Maybe someone should hand them a mirror — and then tell them to pass it along to all their “more educated” friends.
RELATED: If you want a good laugh, check out this article on NPR chief Vivian Schiller* at Big Government.
When asked βDo you believe there is an imbalance at NPR in terms of liberals and conservatives in the newsroom? If the answer is βyesβ what do you propose to do about it?β
Schiller responded by saying they get a βtremendous amount of criticism for being too conservative as wellβ and wishes those people could be in their editorial meetings so they could see what goes on. She then states NPRβs journalism reflects βno particular bias.β
After, she says thereβs no question itβs a βperception issueβ that some believe NPR is liberal in nature.
Now, I wonder why folks would get that perception? Follow the link for video.
*No relation to Ron Schiller that I know of.
UPDATE: Roger L. Simon calls this The Protocols of the Elders of NPR.
(Crossposted at Public Secrets)