Debunked: #IRS not targeting progressive groups like they did Tea Party groups
**Posted by Phineas
On Monday, The Hill and others carried a story that seemed to strongly change the narrative of the IRS “targeting scandal.” In testimony before the House Ways and Means committee, acting IRS head Danny Werfel said that the targeting had gone on longer than originally thought –into 2013– and that it hadΒ included liberal and progressive groups:
But Rep. Sandy Levin (Mich.), the top Democrat on the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, said that the IRS told Congress for the first time on Monday that βprogressiveβ was also a term used on BOLO lists.Β
In a release, Ways and Means Democrats stressed that liberal groups were among almost 300 groups seeking tax-exempt status that Treasuryβs inspector general for tax administration reviewed for the May audit outlining the targeting of Tea Party groups.Β
Levin said Monday that the audit left that information out, and called for Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) to bring Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration Russell George back for more testimony.Β
βThe audit served as the basis and impetus for a wide range of Congressional investigations and this new information shows that the foundation of those investigations is flawed in a fundamental way,β Levin said in a statement.
This would seem to weaken at least one aspect of what has been a major scandal for the Obama administration, that conservative and Tea Party groups were singled out inappropriately for special attention that amounted to political harassment and a denial of equal treatment under the law, based on their political views. If left-liberal groups were given similar treatment, then the charge becomes one of mere bureaucratic incompetence, rather than political persecution. And it would tie in with the administration’s favorite defense in scandals:Β “We’re not evil. We’re just stupid.”
But… Not so fast.
Writing for National Review, Eliana Johnson looks at this new revelation and findsΒ yet another smokescreen:
Acting IRS commissioner Danny Werfel on Monday told reporters that the now-infamous βBe On The Lookoutβ list was far broader than was originally disclosed in the Treasury Department inspector generalβs report. Reports from outlets including theΒ Associated Press, which I cited in myΒ original report, and nowΒ Bloomberg News, confirmed Werfelβs account, indicating that various versions of theΒ list not only included terms like βtea party,β but also βprogressive,β βOccupy,β and βIsrael.βΒ
A November 2010Β version of the listΒ obtained byΒ National Review Online, however, suggests that while the list did contain the word βprogressive,βΒ screeners were in fact instructed to treat βprogressiveβΒ groups differently from βteaΒ partyβΒ groups. Whereas screeners were merely alerted that a designation of 501(c)(3) status βmay not be appropriateβ forΒ applications containing the wordΒ βprogressiveβ βΒ 501(c)(3) organizationsΒ are prohibited from conducting any political activities βΒ they were told to send those of tea-party groups offΒ IRS higher-ups for further scrutiny.Β
That means the applications of progressive groups could be approved on the spotΒ by line agents, whileΒ those of tea-party groups could not. Furthermore, the November 2010 list noted that tea-party cases were βcurrently being coordinated with EOT,β which stands for Exempt Organizations Technical, a group of tax lawyers in Washington, D.C. Those of progressive groups were not.Β
In other words, “Nice try, Representative Levin, but you might want to contact the White House to find out what’s next on the list of distractions.”
This does raise several questions, though. First, Acting Commissioner Werfel surely had to know of the disparate treatment of conservative and liberal groups and its significance in this scandal. Why bring this up as if it was exculpatory? A little “suggestion” from the White House? It may be time for him to come back to testify under oath to explain himself.
Second, this scandal has been known for weeks, and there have been days of testimony by various Right-wing groups complaining about mistreatment by the IRS. If lefty groups were similarly picked on, where were they? Why didn’t they demand to be heard? Why didn’t the Democrats produce them as witnesses? Surely they deserve justice, too, don’t they?
As Johnson’s research shows, they weren’t at the hearing because they had no complaint. The bureaucracy wasn’t interfering with the exercise of their constitutional rights.
Just ours.
RELATED: Evidence showsΒ 12 different IRS groupsΒ targeted conservatives across the land. Those “rogue agents” sure got around. Jay Cost on the need for bureaucratic reform toΒ protect the republic.
(Crossposted at Public Secrets)