Senator Chuck Schumer: Hypocrite extraordinaire
Read about what Chuck Schumer said about EITs in 2004 versus what he’s saying now.
Souce close to Pelosi: She knew the US was waterboarding
Will the fit hit the shan now that it’s been confirmed that her denials about knowing that we were actively engaged in waterboarding were lies?
Vindication for Gen. David Petraeus
It’s no secret by now – to the thinking classes, anyway – that Gen. David Petraeus has been vindicated by the successes we’ve seen take place in Iraq over the last year and a half. The General that the far left has for years loved to hate – even going so far as to take a nasty ad out on him in the NYT that strongly implied he was a “traitor” – has more than proved his worth to the US military, to coalition forces in Iraq, and to those of us here stateside who always believed that the war in Iraq was a worthy cause, and one worth winning.
Pete Hoekstra: Hearings on “who knew” might not be a bad idea
In light of the news this week of a report detailing how many times (40) select members of Congress – including Nancy Pelosi – had been briefed about the use of EITs, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee is suggesting that hearings might be in order:
Where’s the outrage over the “outrage” on Congressional knowledge of EITs?
Both Politico and ABC’s The Note have reported this week about a report prepared by the DNI’s office and submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee that contains a chronology of Congressional briefings on the use of EITs (enhanced interrogation techniques). How many times were select members of Congress briefed?