Batch of pre-war Afghanistan and Iraq documents are released

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on March 16, 2006 at 7:28 pm

It’s about time:

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has created a website where it will post documents captured in postwar Afghanistan and Iraq. The website is hosted by the Foreign Military Studies Office Joint Reserve Intelligence Center at Fort Leavenworth and will be updated continuously with new documents.

The first batch of materials, released late Wednesday, includes nine documents captured in connection with Operation Iraqi Freedom and 28 documents previously released on February 14, 2006, in conjunction with a study of those documents conducted by analysts at West Point. Sources on Capitol Hill and within the intelligence community tell The Weekly Standard that hundreds of new documents will be made available in the coming days, including 50-60 hours of audiotapes from the Iraqi regime.

ODNI officials will concentrate their early efforts on making available audiotapes and videotapes that have come from the former Iraqi regime. Twenty-five Arabic language translators will be hired to review these recordings for potentially sensitive information before they are posted. According to officials familiar with the DOCEX program, the U.S. government has in its possession more than 3,000 hours of recordings from the Iraqi regime. Among the collection: recordings of meetings between Saddam Hussein and other regime leaders; videotapes of speeches that Saddam thought would be important; audio and video of Saddam’s meetings with foreign leaders; videotapes from conferences sponsored by the regime; and even videotapes of regime-sponsored brutality.

Materials made public in the first wave of the release will be those least likely to
raise objections from the intelligence community and U.S. allies. Negroponte plans to include many of the documents labeled “NIV”–for No Intelligence Value–in this first group of materials.

But Pete Hoekstra (R-Mich.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, insists that documents relevant to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003 will be released in short order. “There may be many documents that relate to their WMD programs. Those should be released,” says Hoekstra. “Same thing with links to terrorism.”

Among that next batch may be the approximately 700 documents that served as the foundation for a fascinating study by the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia. Analysts from the Institute for Defense Analysis reviewed thousands of documents for that two-year study of the Iraq War from the perspective of Iraqis. Declassified excerpts of their final report were published in a highly illuminating article in the forthcoming issue of Foreign Affairs. And the full report will be published as a book in the coming months.

Hayes goes on to correctly point out that we will now be able to get answers to the following questions:

How close were the French and the Russians to the former Iraqi regime? What kind of information was being passed to the Iraqis on the eve of war in early 2003? What is the real story of Iraq’s WMD programs? Why did Saddam’s military leaders and scientists fabricate their reports on the progress of those programs? Which terrorist groups had an active presence in Baghdad? How many Palestinian Liberation Front jihadists did the Iraqi regime train each year? How effective was Saddam Hussein in deceiving UN inspectors throughout the 1990s? What did Saddam Hussein privately tell Yasser Arafat when the Palestinian leader came to Baghdad? And what were the Western targets of the “Blessed July” martyrdom operation that was being planned as U.S. troops crossed into Iraq in March 2003?

The link to the page where the documents have been posted is in the article, but I’m posting it again for anyone who missed it. Keep scrolling as there are many documents there to examine. It’s important to note that the website has posted the following: “The US Government has made no determination regarding the authenticity of the documents, validity or factual accuracy of the information contained therein, or the quality of any translations, when available.” So while reading the documents contained in the links, keep that in mind.

I’m looking fwd to Hayes’ analysis of the documents, once he’s reviewed them and verfied their authenticity.

Also commenting on the release of the pre-war Afghanistan and Iraq documents: John at Powerline, The Jawa Report, Gay Patriot, OpiniPundit (must-read!), Jason Smith

More: Read Amy Proctor’s post “Media Ignores Bush Exoneration” where she blogs about some of audio tapes that were translated examined after at the February meeting by the International Intelligence Summit. These documents, as the WashTimes link she provides notes, would appear to prove that when Bush stated in his 2003 State of The Union address that the British gov’t had learned that Iraq was seeking “significant quantities” of uranium from Africa, he was right.

Related Toldjah So posts:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

  • All Things Beautiful trackbacked with "Operation Swarmer" And The First Strike War Doctrine
  • 13 Responses to “Batch of pre-war Afghanistan and Iraq documents are released”

    Comments

    1. steve says:

      Off topic. –ST

    2. Mwalimu Daudi says:

      It will drive the Democrats and the MSM nuts! :d

    3. forest hunter says:

      Ergo, the usual drive by OT responses by the factually challenged, planless, shroomsville inhabitants, eh Mwalimu Daudi.

    4. sanity says:

      Off topic. –ST

      Comment by steve

      Not steve! Noooooo, he would NEVER go off topic!

      ;)

      All I can say is this should have been done before, but i guess it takes time to navigate through, decifer and translate all those documents.

      I am sure the democrats will spin this somehow, maybe on the timing of it or how long it took….just like the Cheney shooting accident or a terror alert.

      I will say once the documents come out and if they do support what the President, the VP, Rumsfield and other Iraqis have said…the poll numbers (if anyone really cares about them) will surge up at least 10 points.

      How many points do you think his poll numebrs will go up if the documents shown are support what the President has been saying all along?

    5. CavalierX says:

      So far my favorites are the pictures of known al-Qaeda terrorists in Iraq Saddam was keeping tabs on in 2002 (among them Abu Musab al-Zarqawi) and the “letter from Abu ‘Abullah Al-Kuwaiti outlining
      the next attack against the Americans, and issuing a statement to the
      Americans to let them know of their fighters’ readiness to kill hundreds of
      thousands with their nuclear and biological arsenal.” Now, what was that doing in Iraq, which the Left insists had nothing to do with either WMDs or terrorism? Mmmm, good stuff. And it’s only the tip of the iceberg.

    6. camojack says:

      What about the infamous “Downing Street Memo”? :d
      (Just kidding!!!)

    7. steve says:

      Can I do my “Grimm’s Law”, joke yet? Peace

    8. forest hunter says:

      …….joke yet? Peace =)) It’s been said that the ability to tell a joke is timing, but being the joke :-@ as you continue your evasion to answer a single question, would have to embarrass someone with even a half an ounce of intelligence. l-)

    9. steve says:

      Edited – insult. Cut it out, steve. –ST

    10. steve says:

      That forest guy really deserves those and they are very clean. Cutting, but very clean. And by the way I’m constantly insulted and name called. What’s fair is fair. Peace

      And I’ve edited the insults to you when I’ve had a chance to catch them. Calm down and practice the peace you preach. Peace. –ST

    11. forest hunter says:

      Bring it!