All about life, liberty and the pursuit of hopeiness.
| Times Online | 0 | |
| Fox Boston | 0 | |
| Merc. News | 0 | |
| Big Govt | Obama’s Shock Troops: SEIU and Political Intimidation in St. Louis |
0 |
| NYT | 0 |
Audacity of Truth
Whiner-in-Chief:
"[W]hether the grumbling is about Republicans on Fox or bloggers in pajamas, there's a word for what the president and his aides are doing. That word is "whining." And nothing [...] does more damage to Obama's credibility or authority than the sense that a popular president is becoming the whiner-in-chief."
- John Nichols, Nation Magazine - 10/12/09
NYT claim: “voter suppression” is part of Republican “strategy” for winning elections
Once again, they are carrying water for the Democratic party.
They’ve certainly got their scare tactics down pat, don’t they?
Hat tip: GT
Thursday PM Update I: ST reader Karl calls it right: NY Times opposes election integrity
Fri AM Update I: Gateway Pundit has a couple of excellent and very detailed posts about Democratic voter fraud here and here. Consider them must-reads. Where’s the outrage, NYT & other ‘concerned’ Democrats?
Original time of this post 9/21/06 – 3:22 PM
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Trackbacks
10 Responses to “NYT claim: “voter suppression” is part of Republican “strategy” for winning elections”
Comments
Blogads
Disclaimer: The views expressed on this blog do not necessarily reflect those of ST's advertisers, nor do their opinions necessarily reflect ST's. Stats
Well, it’s TRUE! Take the dead for expample, there is no more underappreciated, or more discriminated against, group of disabled people in the US than the dead. And once again, the evil Republicans refused to allow language in the Voter Rights Act to stop this callous, cynical, cold hearted attempt to make these handicapped people suffer even more by disenfranchising those poor people who have already suffered the ultimate injury!
Severian you heartless thug! I bet if you had your way, only live and legal citizens of the US would be able to vote in US elections.
Selfish!
What a bunch of, pardon my language, MALARKY!
I love the whole “people won’t go through the effort to get an ID” thing – makes you wonder why one who wouldn’t go through the effort to get a valid ID would even go through the effort to vote in the first place.
I head on c-span left bias the discussion on the state of Georgia’s bill on having a photo ID to vote.
The loons were calling in saying this discrimadates against the poor, ect. Do none of the damn people drive and does Ga. not put pictures on on the licenses? God forbid you have to show a friggin picture to vote, the moonbats just want to make sure all the illegals get the vote in ….. PICTURE ID’S SHOULD BE MANDITORY TO VOTE, PERIOD.
- There’s a bill in congress to establish exactly that Drewsmom. Hopefully the Reps can get it passed the Demidolts roadblocks.
- Bang
If this passes, it will totally screw up Chicago politics. What’s next? You can only vote once? Sheesh!
This seems like set-up for a re-count demand, “we wouldda wun, but you turned our ID-less voters away!”.
Or more likely, Tom, “¡HabrÃamos ganado, pero usted dio vuelta a nuestros votantes Identificacio’n-menos ausentes!”
Hey Kevin, “What chu talkin bout Willis”? I don’t speak mexicano, translate please, thx.