It’s one thing to target a radio or TV personality when you think he and/or his staff have gone over the line with allegedly ‘offensive’ words and/or statements they’ve made that can be attributed only to themselves, but it’s another thing entirely to go after one for using the offending word or statement in context of talking about the controversy.
Such is the case with liberal blogger John Aravois, who, as James Joyner reports, is targeting Glenn Beck’s TV program because he used the “f” word (the slang word sometimes used for gay people) in the context of a discussion about how the actor in Hollywood who used it (Isiah Washington from Grey’s Anatomy) is under fire from gay groups. Here’s the relevant part of the transcript from Beck’s show. Beck’s interviewing with 97.1 FM St Louis radio host Dave Glover:
GLOVER: Yes. Basically you have Isaiah Washington, who`s one of the stars of the show, who referred to one of his co-stars during a heated argument as a derogatory term for a gay man that starts with “F”, rhymes with maggot. Did it a couple more times after that. And do you like how I did that?
BECK: Do you know that “The New York Times” wouldn’t even print — I mean, we can say the word. We’re having an adult conversation here. Wouldn`t even print the word “fagot.” [sic]
BECK: Wouldn’t print it. I find that amazing.
GLOVER: When did we elevate obnoxious behavior to a medical condition? You know, I mean, when is just being a jerk, an obnoxious jerk mean that you now have to go to rehab? We`d be having the same conversation each week.
BECK: It`s Michael Richards and before that it was Mel Gibson. It`s the same damn story.
GLOVER: Yes. It is the same story. And we need to stop. Just call it what it is, OK? When someone acts in an obnoxious way, they are being a jerk. If people do it enough, they are a jerk, and it doesn`t mean that they have a genetic condition that makes them do it.
It means they`re a jerk and they need to study and grow up, be a man and stop acting like a jerk, not go seek out medical attention or, you know, spiritual counseling. Just stop it.
What’s fascinating about the ‘outrage’ over Beck’s use of the “f” word (which I’ve decided not to use) is that Aravosis is using it himself in his blog post about it. But I guess there’s a difference in him using it in the context of the discussion than Beck – you see, Beck’s a conservative.
GLAAD’s wigging out, too:
Glover’s attempt to identify the epithet without using it on-air was in keeping with how other broadcast and cable outlets â€“ including CNN â€“ have approached it since the 64th Annual Golden GlobeÂ® Awards incident that sparked a national dialogue about the slur and the impact of anti-gay prejudice. Throughout CNN’s coverage of the Isaiah Washington controversy over the past week, Beck appears to be the only host to have repeated the epithet on the air.
“Beck’s obnoxious repetition of the slur — and his flip dismissal of it as simply a ‘naughty name’ â€“ speaks volumes about his appalling ignorance of its impact,” Giuliano said. “Beck added nothing to the audience’s understanding of the issue, except perhaps to demonstrate his juvenile belief that repeating an anti-gay slur makes him an ‘adult.'”
On Tuesday, GLAAD reached out to CNN’s standards and practices department to discuss the matter. On Wednesday, a CNN spokesperson told GLAAD that Beck wasn’t using the word himself, that Beck’s show is an “opinion show” and not a news program, and that Beck was expressing an opinion about The New York Times’ decision to not use the word.
“The ugliness of Glenn Beck’s word choice and his ignorance of its impact really speak for themselves,” Giuliano said. “Other CNN personalities have discussed derogatory slurs as part of this story without debasing that discussion. CNN has a responsibility to address Beck’s crudeness and require that he adhere to basic standards of respect.”
Sigh. When someone uses a slur against someone, it’s justifiable to be upset. When someone’s using the slur in context of a discussion about the person(s) who used it, in most cases it’s not. I think GLAAD and Aravosis both need to, well, get a life.
Beck and Glover had what’s called a “discussion” on the issue (Gasp!), and Beck chose to use the word in the context of the issue he and Glover were talking about. The attempted stifling of the usage of these terms in context is one example of how the left goes about trying to punish speech they don’t agree with, simply because they are ‘offended’ by the contextual terms used in the discussion of an issue.
Should you always use words that may offend someone in that manner? I’ve always said that just because we have the right to say something doesn’t make it right to say, and as I noted earlier I chose not to use the “f” word in this post outside of reposting the transcript of Beck’s and Glover’s conversation about it, but others have and will and just because someone chooses to use a word in context which others find offensive is no reason to target that person nor his or her advertisers in an attempt to ‘punish’ them. It’d be like targeting Aravosis blog and his advertisers because he himself used it in his post – in context.