Introducing Media Mythbusters

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on July 18, 2007 at 8:46 pm

My good friend Lorie Byrd, along with several notable contributors, has created a Wiki page called “Media Mythbusters” – what is it? Who better than her to explain:

The Media Mythbusters site was created to provide a place for the archiving of comprehensive facts and links chronicling major journalism’s treatment of certain stories in which questions have arisen regarding facts or methods of reporting. These treatments of news events by major media have direct and significant impact upon public opinion and upon policymakers. Careful consideration of the way these stories were handled by the media is essential to both a well informed public and policy, and are intended to contribute to a more reliable and responsible major media desired and needed by all. The goal of this site is to be a reliable resource, accessible to all, to provide news consumers with tools and information to allow them to determine how best to process information they receive through major media outlets.

She explains how the site came to be at that same link.

I’ve bookmarked both the Wiki page and the Media Mythbusters blog in my “Media Blogs/Media Watchers” section on the left column of this page. Make sure you save the links to your favorites as well and visit them often.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

7 Responses to “Introducing Media Mythbusters”

Comments

  1. Mwalimu Daudi says:

    Here is something that Media Mythbusters can look into:

    Newsweek’s Evan Thomas comes up with the 2007 update of “Fake But Accurate” when discussing the MSM’s reporting in the fraudulent Duke rape case.

    Key quote from Mr. Thomas:

    “The narrative was properly about race, sex and class. . . . We went a beat too fast in assuming that a rape took place. . . . We just got the facts wrong. The narrative was right, but the facts were wrong.”

    Oh, dear – if it were not for those pesky facts, the narrative would have been perfect. The “no WMDs in Iraq” narrative would also be perfect without the fact that 500+ WMDs were found. Likewise, the “no al Qaeda connections to Saddam” narrative would shine more brightly if inconvenient facts did not get in the way.

    One gets the feeling that the MSM hungers for an Orwellian “Ministry of Truth” where counter-revolutionary anti-progressive documents, photographs (and people) could be disposed of so as not to interfere with the official narrative.

  2. camojack says:

    It sounds like a great idea…and an excellent resource.

  3. Drewsmom says:

    Thanks for the fact checker Sister.:d

  4. John Galt says:

    This is great… and it’s going in my bookmarks immediately.