Merc. News

Feinstein still pondering Calif. gubernatorial bid

0
Big Govt

Obama’s Shock Troops: SEIU and Political Intimidation in St. Louis

 0
NYT

Broader Measure of Unemployment Stands at 17.5%

0
WSJ

The Return of the Inflation Tax

 0
Sac Bee

Many California jobs ‘saved’ by stimulus funds weren’t in jeopardy

0
All Headlines »
 

Romney makes it official: He’s out

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on February 7, 2008 at 1:23 pm

The rumors were swirling this morning, but now it’s official. The AP’s got a blurb about it – I just heard about it on Rush a few minutes ago when I went out to grab a bite to eat. Romney made the announcement during his CPAC speech.

McCain has pretty much just now officially become the Republican party nominee.

He speaks at 3 this afternoon at CPAC. Several bloggers from Townhall are in attendance, so I’m sure they’ll be providing updates as to what happens.

Update 1 – 1:36 PM: Here’s video of Romney’s CPAC speech.

Update 2 – 4:21 PM: Here’s a transcript of McCain’s speech. I haven’t had a chance to read it in full yet, but will tonight.

Update 3 – 6:37 PM: Here are some video highlights from McCain’s CPAC speech, including the intro from Senator Tom Coburn, which I hear was a good one.

Update 4 – 6:52 PM: Heck, forget the McCain speech – watch Tom Coburn’s intro of McCain its entirety. Reminded me a little of Zell Miller’s barnburner he gave at the RNC back in 2004.

In: Breaking News Stories, Election '08, Elections, Mitt | Email This Post | Print This

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

  • Neocon News » Romney to drop out? Yep, Romney’s out. Brilliant move given his options. Video added.
  • Romney drops out, Ehrlich to endorse McCain in Baltimore tonight?

    • 24 Responses to “Romney makes it official: He’s out”

    Comments

    1. PCD says:
      February 7, 2008 at 1:47 pm

      That’s it, I’m sitting out this election. I’m going to do to the “Moderates” what they’ve done for decades.

    2. Great White Rat says:
      February 7, 2008 at 3:09 pm

      A good, moving exit speech. The way Romney ended his campaign was the most impressive thing about it. Too bad we didn’t see more of that earlier.

      PCD, you’ve got a point, but don’t sit out completely. The congressional races are now the place where conservatives will have to make our stand in 2008.

    3. PCD says:
      February 7, 2008 at 3:42 pm

      Let me leave you with this quote,

      “Obama and Hillary won’t be able to leave Iraq as President because with their election they own the war, but only McCain can leave Iraq immediately.”

    4. Tango says:
      February 7, 2008 at 3:46 pm

      Much can (and probably WILL) happen between now and November. Let us ignore the bribe being put together by the incumbent Congress (read: “stimulus package”) -and send some of these spineless jellyfish packing. We can DO this, people!

    5. Lorica says:
      February 7, 2008 at 4:29 pm

      And ya know this is another think that is bothering me. If we don’t elect a Rep President next year, then the Dem President is going to lay claim to OUR victory in Iraq. All the history books will show these lowlife pukes as the victors and we are in oblivion. We need a Rep in the White House so that we can call that Our Victory. Just like Vietnam suddenly became “Nixon’s” war, when all along it was Johnson’s war. – Lorica

    6. greg says:
      February 7, 2008 at 5:09 pm

      I was a Fredhead, when he dropped out I was for Mitt, but now that McCain is the candidate I’ll back him. Say what you want there’s a good chance that during the next term there will be two supreme court vacancies and I have more faith in his choices than either of the dems.

    7. ruth says:
      February 7, 2008 at 5:44 pm

      McCain is still a senator and I will be watching to see how he performs in that job, if at all, between now and the Republican convention. Mitt Romney has only suspended his campaign and that is a reason for holding my voting decision at least for now. The spin is on as I have watched the news interviews of various Republican spokespeople and they tell us how the unification has begun. It is only a possibility at this point and unrealistic to think that the McCain opposition in the Republican party will fade any time soon. We are not talking sour grapes here, or pouting etc. I personally feel that McCain is a big risk tempermentally and physically and has serious character flaws. Enough. God bless Mitt Romney and his family and their contribution to the process. They are surley a role model for American families.

    8. Baklava says:
      February 7, 2008 at 5:51 pm

      UNBELIEVABLE words from McCain:

      Senator Clinton and Senator Obama want to increase the size of the federal government.

      I intend to reduce it. I will not sign a bill with earmarks in it, any earmarks in it. I will fight for the line item veto, and I will not permit any expansion whatsoever of the entitlement programs that are bankrupting us. On the contrary, I intend to reform those programs so that government is no longer in that habit of making promises to Americans it does not have the means to keep.

      Senator Clinton and Senator Obama will raise your taxes.

      I intend to cut them. I will start by making the Bush tax cuts permanent. I will cut corporate tax rates from 35 to 25%

      If he talks like this in debates with Hillary and Obama. It’s on!!!!

    9. Lorica says:
      February 7, 2008 at 8:16 pm

      Well Bak, there is alot of stuff in that quote that I could agree with. Especially the corporate tax cut. I have been against them for sometime now. I can’t name a single corporate tax that isn’t passed onto the end consumer anyway. – Lorica

    10. Zach says:
      February 7, 2008 at 8:38 pm

      Don’t be fooled by McCain. He will sweet talk for a few weeks to try and gain the conservatives, but when he doesn’t succeed, he will take a drastic turn to the left.

      It is also my firm belief that we need to vote this year. Not for McCain, but for the House and Senate seats, the state seats and the judges and our governors.

      We need to make it through the next four years unscathed and we cannot accomplish if the Democrats retain hold of Congress and our states.

    11. Mwalimu Daudi says:
      February 7, 2008 at 11:46 pm

      If we don’t elect a Rep President next year, then the Dem President is going to lay claim to OUR victory in Iraq.

      A rare time I find myself in disagreement with Lorica. The situation in Iraq is improving, and we are indeed winning. However, a lot work remains for the next Administration to do. Hilly the Hun and the Empty Suit, like Hilly’s husband, have demonstrated clearly they do not understand the stakes in the Middle East. How can they, when their egos are inversely proportional to their competence and intelligence? In the end I think that they will gladly toss the Iraqi people under the bus for the mere prospect of a momentary bump in the polls, which is all any “progressive” really cares about anymore.

      The US betrayal of Vietnam is the model here. Democrats are very adept at losing wars. The irony for Democrats is that the disaster that is certain to follow will cling to them far more tightly than it will to Republicans, frantic MSM spin notwithstanding. If Democrats still live in the shadow of their debacle in Vietnam, which was a mixture of incompetence and partisan hate, what will this do to them?

    12. Lorica says:
      February 7, 2008 at 11:54 pm

      Well MD I won’t disagree with you, but you know and I know that when we win this war, and a Dem gets in office, they will take credit for it. – Lorica

    13. TedintheShed says:
      February 8, 2008 at 1:03 am

      That’s it, I’m sitting out this election. I’m going to do to the “Moderates” what they’ve done for decades.

      Indeed, if Obama wins the Dem nomination then I will too. If Hillary wins, she gets my vote.

    14. sanity says:
      February 8, 2008 at 11:11 am

      It really is a sad thing to hear Conservatives speak in such a way.

      I was listening to Laura Ingraham this morning and she did have a point, if we are truly Conservatives, then we want what is best for the country.

      Is putting Obama or Hillary into the Presidency with thier socialist ideals what is best for this country?

      I agree, I don’t like McCain, but at this time thier is only McCain or Huckabee and i don’t think Huckabee can win, which will leave McCain.

      Now while there is alot of thing I do not agree with and down right dislike McCain for, he is spot on with the GWOT and Iraq. With Iran building a 2nd Nuclear plant the next president is going to have to make some hard decisions about Iran also.

      Do you think Hillary or Obama will be able to do this? Do you think they will be taken seriously?

      We also have to look at the Supreme Court, there will most likely be at least 1 or 2 retiring, perhaps more and you KNOW what type of judges Hillary or Obama will appoint.

      Yes, there is much in the past I disagree with McCain on, and it is very hard to say this, but I will vote for him if it means keeping this country out of the hands of socialists like Hillary and Obama.

      I will do what is good for the country and for those that talk about sitting out voting, your right to vote, fought and died for by American Soldiers, just think about that for a few minutes before you make such statements.

      Do what is best for the country.

    15. TedintheShed says:
      February 8, 2008 at 11:28 am

      I will do what is good for the country and for those that talk about sitting out voting, your right to vote, fought and died for by American Soldiers, just think about that for a few minutes before you make such statements.

      I was not a soldier. However, my father who was a decorated soldier in the Korean War (3 Purple Heart and the Silver Star) instilled into me a great debt of gratitutde to the American Soldier. My son is a soldier (Navy) and my nephew (who I helped raise as a son) is in Iraq right now in the Army Corp of Engineers.

      That said, that is EXACTLY I am thinking about. I will not squander my vote on these peole you ask me to elect. You are asking me not to support my country, but you are asking me to support a political party who only have interest in maintaining political power in mind and NOT representing the citizens of America.

      We revolted once, yelling “taxation without representation” at one point. I contend that our elected officials no longer represent us. Will we revolt in some way again?

      Do what is best for the country.

      Which is exactly why I will vote for Hillary. In the long run it in all likelihood be what is best for this country. Electing John McCain is far worse, as all he would do is maintain the stautus quo of the socialist agenda maintained by both parties that the American citizen is so complacent about fighting against.

      I am hoping with the high taxation that Hillary will bring about will hurt American’s pocket book enough to wake them from their slumber and perhaps serch for a person of integrity, a patriot that is sincere about what they say. I really don’t see it happening though, as they would have to go through the ranks of one of the two establishment parties in any hope to get elected.

      That probably won’t happen, which is why I say in all liklihood: America is dead.

    16. sanity says:
      February 8, 2008 at 11:47 am

      I am hoping with the high taxation that Hillary will bring about will hurt American’s pocket book enough to wake them from their slumber and perhaps serch for a person of integrity, a patriot that is sincere about what they say. I really don’t see it happening though, as they would have to go through the ranks of one of the two establishment parties in any hope to get elected.

      So to get ‘our’ way we need to make America suffer first?

      This doesn’t seem right.

    17. NC Cop says:
      February 8, 2008 at 12:00 pm

      So to get ‘our’ way we need to make America suffer first?

      This doesn’t seem right.

      Agreed. Unfortunately, Ted is not the only one who feels this way. I’ve been reading about a lot of people who think this is the way to go.

    18. TedintheShed says:
      February 8, 2008 at 12:02 pm

      So to get ‘our’ way we need to make America suffer first?

      This doesn’t seem right.

      When a leg is set improperly sometimes you need to rebreak it so that one can walk properly again, fully mended.

      Painful yes, but in the long term worth it.

    19. TedintheShed says:
      February 8, 2008 at 12:05 pm

      Agreed. Unfortunately, Ted is not the only one who feels this way. I’ve been reading about a lot of people who think this is the way to go.

      I agree NC- it is unfortunate on many, many levels. :(

    20. sanity says:
      February 8, 2008 at 12:16 pm

      When a leg is set improperly sometimes you need to rebreak it so that one can walk properly again, fully mended.

      Painful yes, but in the long term worth it.

      The bad part is that during the time we live in, breaking that leg again could mean the death of the whole.

      During a time when Russia is once again becoming a threat both increasingly in its stances and help with Iran.

      During a time when Iran is building its 2nd nuclear plant and threatening not only the US but also its ally in Israel.

      During a time when our borders are essentially fiully open to anyone, including terrorists.

      During a time when the economy is slowing…

      Do you really want to break that leg when the whole of the body is in the middle of other complications?

      Especially when these complications could very well be life threatening?

    21. TedintheShed says:
      February 8, 2008 at 12:31 pm

      Do you really want to break that leg when the whole of the body is in the middle of other complications?

      Body is dead already if we don’t. Among all the things you listed, the American Politician is the single greatest threat to America. Without correcting that problem, none of the others will ever be corrected.

      So yeah, rebreak the leg because without mending it we will only gimp around hte other issues anyway.

      I live in Ohio, and I can attest many, many people feel the same way that I do although for different reasons. The Republican party has really screwed the pooch here and in all liklihood Ohio will go to the Democrats because Strictland has been very careful about what he has been doing so as not to upset the apple cart, probably until the general election rolls around.

    22. TedintheShed says:
      February 8, 2008 at 1:29 pm

      Sanity,

      Since you have been so gracious I thought I owed you a direct response to your questions.

      During a time when Russia is once again becoming a threat both increasingly in its stances and help with Iran.

      Since the era of “free trade” has been ushered in by Democrats and Republicans alike (McCain among those), this nation can not afford a second arms race since we barely own our own nation as it is. In a second arms race, with Russin’s oil resopurces we will lose. The Gipper has to be shaling his head in disbelief.

      During a time when Iran is building its 2nd nuclear plant and threatening not only the US but also its ally in Israel.

      Yes. Religious fanaticism. Our only hope here is that Israel can fend off for 4 more years (this will more than likely be the case) in the hopes that we get someone who can take a stance that will solve this issue.

      During a time when our borders are essentially fiully open to anyone, including terrorists.

      …and Juan McLame will solve this issue?

      This is what I don’t get about the “elect Juam McCain becasue of the GWoT” stance. His supposed stance (which I do not believe at all) on the GWoT diametrically opposes his open border stance so that cuts no chhese for me.

      During a time when the economy is slowing…

      John McCain, who favors government expansion, will only make this issue worse. This is a Neo-Con’s weakness, and it was resolutely displayed by President Bush over the last few years.