Remind me never to get on his bad side

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on April 25, 2008 at 8:48 pm

Rick Moran has one of the most devastating takedowns of a typical Barack Obama apologist I’ve seen yet.

We’ve all come across them – whether they be in the blogosphere or on the pages of the NYT, or just standing there by the water cooler. Many of them infuriating types because they express the same sentiment that BO does: that any issue that paints him in a negative light is simply a “distraction” from the “real issues” facing Americans (judgment and character are not “real issues,” you see).

There’s so much Obama news out there I just can’t keep up with it all. Click this link and just keep scrolling.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

3 Responses to “Remind me never to get on his bad side”

Comments

  1. stackja says:

    ST I just ignore the “infuriating types” and their “real issues”.
    BO does not know the meaning of judgment and character.

  2. Big Bang Hunter (pumping you up) says:

    - Well “something” is running underneath the radar that seems to be giving Obama and Clinton both political wedgies. Witness the latest Rasmussen poll that shows the following total disconnect:

    - First the poll asks which “party” voters trust more on a series of different issues…..and then asks the same question, except which of the “candidates” voters trust most, naming them.

    - Heres an example:

    * Which party do you trust to best handle Iraq?

    Dems 48% – Reps 43%

    * Which candidate do you trust to best handle Iraq?

    McCain 50% – Clinton 40%
    McCain 48% – Obama 39%

    - Whats wrong with this picture?

    - In four separate categories, the Dems poll at higher trust numbers in things like taxes, corruption, Iraq, etc. But in every case except one single item, McCain polls solidly higher than either Obama or Clinton.

    - Conclusion. Either the electorate thinks McCain is a better Democrat than either of the Dem candidates, or something is far more askew among the Donkeys than anyone previously suspected.

    - We report. You decide.

    - BBH – **==

  3. yo says:

    If the nyt thinks they can shut us up on the rev wright issue, and call us racists for even bringing it up, I fervently hope that we will, as Rambo said, “give em a war they won’t believe”.>:/