The big story of the day is Barack Obama’s renewed call for refocusing on Afghanistan during a speech he made today in Washington, DC. He called for a “surge” of sorts in troops for Afghanistan, while reminding everyone of how he opposed the Iraq war and believes it should end.
The problem is that Senator Obama only became concerned enough to call for a different strategy in Afghanistan only after he started running for president. At roughly the same time he announced his candidacy for president, he was also named Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on European Affairs, which has jurisdiction over NATO. You’d think as “concerned” as he was about Afghanistan that he would have had at least one policy and/or oversight hearing related to those “concerns.” Unfortunately for him, liberals like Joe Conason first reported about the fact that the committee “languishing” under Senator Obama’s leadership, while not holding any oversight hearings on anything, let alone Afghanistan. Senator Hillary Clinton pointed out Obama’s failure to lead this subcommittee in a least one debate earlier this year.
Politifact noted that Clinton’s claim was true:
Congressional records show, and spokesmen for several subcommittee members confirm, the subcommittee has not held any policy hearings since Obama was appointed chair in early 2007. The subcommittee’s jurisdiction includes “all matters, policies and problems concerning the continent of Europe, including the European member states of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.”
Obama himself admitted it was true at that same debate:
Well, first of all, I became chairman of this committee at the beginning of this campaign, at the beginning of 2007. So it is true that we haven’t had oversight hearings on Afghanistan.
On a McCain conference call earlier today, here’s what Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC), a ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on European Affairs said about Obama’s “leadership” on Afghanistan:
“There’s been a lot of talk about leadership in Congress and in the presidential election, and I think one good indication of real leadership is what we’ve actually done with the responsibility and authority that we have. And here in Congress, we have the opportunity to use hearings, to provide oversight, develop policies and also bring a lot of issues to the public light that might not come out of the Administration.
“Barack Obama and I are leaders of the European Subcommittee of the Foreign Relations Committee. He’s the chairman and he has the ability to have as many hearings with his choice of witnesses that he would like.
”I wrote the letter to Barack because of my concerns about Afghanistan and the fact that Afghanistan is a NATO operation, which comes under the purview of the European Subcommittee that he chairs. My trip to Afghanistan and a number of briefings here suggest some serious concerns. I believe as we’ve made progress in Iraq we’ve seen deterioration in Afghanistan. I know that McCain when he saw the problems in Iraq was able to come up with a strategy which was used by the President which has worked and I believe what McCain has put forth here for Afghanistan suggests the same type of understanding.
”My concern is not just with Barack but the committee itself and not having any hearings on Afghanistan over the last year and a half on our subcommittee – we have missed a lot opportunities to take more responsibility and to bring to public light the problems. I think most Americans would be surprised and concerned to learn of the deterioration there militarily, the increase in poppy crop and the things that have happened and the potential problems if NATO does not keep its commitment.
”So I’m calling on Senator Obama to work with me to have hearings, to help bring to light the issues in Afghanistan, to put pressure on the Administration and others to act decisively there before the situation deteriorates more.”
Here’s a .pdf copy of the letter DeMint sent to Obama.
Not only has the subcommittee languished under the leadership of Obama, but the Senator has never taken it upon himself to visit the country he claims we need to refocus our attentions on.
So while the left tries to score points by asserting that McCain has ”flip-flopped” on his Afghanistan plan and is calling for a surge in troops there in an attempt to copy Obama, remember that the real story is Obama’s phoney “concern” about the situation in Afghanistan, and how he’s been very good at preaching about what he wants to do as president and CIC about the situation in Afghanistan, but very negligent when it has come to actually utilizing the tools he already had as his disposal to make “change” in one of the many parts of the world he claims to believe needs it the most.
Update/Related: Jim Geraghty’s done some digging and concludes that Obama has spent half of the last decade running for higher office (via McQ).
| Email This Post | Print This |





It’s just getting too easy to trot out one example after another showing that the Harbinger of Hope, Change, and Waffles doesn’t know jack about anything related to foreign affairs. The most crucial issue facing the United States –the war with jihadist Islam– and my tropical fish know more than Obama.
Honestly, how does anyone with one whit of sense not see through this faker?
Comment by Anthony (Los Angeles) @ 7/15/2008 - 8:54 pm
Let’s see, he brings up Afghanistan because of the success in Iraq despite the fact he’s not held any hearings on the subject matter in committee.
A diversion I smell…
Comment by vegas art guy @ 7/15/2008 - 8:54 pm
….can a photo op featuring BarryO riding in a tank be far behind?
Comment by Tango @ 7/15/2008 - 9:34 pm
“Congressional records show, and spokesmen for several subcommittee members confirm, the subcommittee has not held any policy hearings since Obama was appointed chair in early 2007.”
I get the point of the post, but also think the sad fact is that, given Obama and the Senate in general, the above quote is actually a positive. The situation would probably be even worse now if those clowns had stuck their noses into it.
Comment by Dave E. @ 7/15/2008 - 10:25 pm
What a schmuck!
He hasn’t a clue about anything American, be it the economy, the military, history, or, as it turns out, humor.
What a schmuck!
Comment by benning @ 7/16/2008 - 6:55 am
Why the sudden focus on Afghanistan? Simple…now that the news from the Iraqi front of the WOT is better than ever, it’s become a “distraction”. Talking about Iraq leads to one inescapable conclusion: John McCain was right, Obama was completely wrong.
Maybe next we’ll see a map of the Middle East on Obama’s web site, with Iraq mysteriously expunged.
Comment by Great White Rat @ 7/16/2008 - 7:58 am
The Moonbats use Afghanistan as the “right war” as cover for their stupidity in Iraq. My congressman Dennis Moore who claims to be a Blue Dog Democrat has a voting record that proves his is a Pelosi Poodle, not a Blue Dog.
He is shucking and jiving now to show support for Afghanistan to hide from his “Cut and Run” stance all along in Iraq.
Barack the Obama is an empty shell who uses some kinda mp3 player for a brain. It plays whatever tune will benefit him today.
Like many have said, he is a “Post Turtle”. The turtle you see on a fence post while driving down a country road. Other people got him where he is, he didn’t, and now that he is there he has no idea what to do.
Comment by jim b @ 7/16/2008 - 10:12 am
===== HEY OBAMA - YOU’RE 7 YEARS LATE TO AFGHANISTAN =====
George Bush was in Afghanistan 7 years ago, bombing the Taliban and terrorists training camps back to the stone age, and Obama is just figuring out Afghanistan is the place to go?
Comment by N Waff @ 7/19/2008 - 5:18 pm