Paterson’s revenge: Pandering for votes or genuine?

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on November 16, 2009 at 8:14 pm

These days, there hasn’t been much love between the race-baiting David Paterson administration in New York and President Obama, so much so, that it sounds like Paterson is getting a bit of revenge against the administration for their lack of support. First it was the criticism from Paterson over Obama admin’s decision to restrict corporate bonus pay (Paterson: “That probably cost New York $1 billion.”) And now, there’s this:

NEW YORK (CBS) – Gov. David Paterson openly criticized the White House on Monday, saying he thought it was a terrible idea to move alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four other suspected terrorists to New York for trial.

“This is not a decision that I would have made. I think terrorism isn’t just attack, it’s anxiety and I think you feel the anxiety and frustration of New Yorkers who took the bullet for the rest of the country,” he said.

Paterson’s comments break with Democrats, who generally support the President’s decision.

“Our country was attacked on its own soil on September 11, 2001 and New York was very much the epicenter of that attack. Over 2,700 lives were lost,” he said. “It’s very painful. We’re still having trouble getting over it. We still have been unable to rebuild that site and having those terrorists so close to the attack is gonna be an encumbrance on all New Yorkers.”

Paterson also said that the White House warned him six months ago this very situation would happen. He said while he disagrees with the decision, he will do everything in his power to make sure that the state’s Department of Homeland Security will keep New Yorkers as safe as possible.

While I have no doubt that Paterson feels like he can more freely speak out against this administration since they’ve been privately pushing him not to run for re-election, I do wonder if his comments today regarding the upcoming KSM trial in NYC is either an attempt to pander to New York voters who have been giving him low ratings for close to a year now, or if it’s genuine. A recent CNN poll showed that a majority of Americans are against a civilian trial for KSM and instead prefer a military trial – but still think it should be in the US. Maybe he’s seen similar numbers for NY?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

7 Responses to “Paterson’s revenge: Pandering for votes or genuine?”

Comments

  1. Carlos says:

    Paterson is a politician. Politicians pander for any votes they think they may have a chance of getting (remember Hillarious’ southern twang?).

    Therefore, it doesn’t matter whether he really would believe what he’s saying if he were Joe Citizen, he’s pandering because he thinks (primarily) that it’ll win him a few extra votes.

  2. Bill says:

    Paterson criticizing Obama? Well – obviously Paterson is a racist! :-?

  3. Swede says:

    Hmmmmm….Interesting to find out Paterson heard of this decision from the White House six months ago…..Hmmmmmm….And Happy Holder only consulted his wife and brother in making the decision? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…. More prevarication out of the Gray House…..What else is new??????

  4. Dave B says:

    The interesting thing about this is if it is true that Paterson IS pandering, then one could conclude that the majority of New Yorkers are pissed off with Obama and Holder for doing it.

  5. I think Paterson is realizing which way the political winds are blowing, and they are away from Teh Cwaziness of Obama and Co.

    Of course, maybe he actually means it, too. The civilian trials in NYC is monstrously moronic.

  6. Lorica says:

    Stupid is as stupid does Mr. Paterson. Get use to it, it’s gonna be a long 3 years. – Lorica

  7. Carlos says:

    Why, I wonder why Mr. Paterson feels the sting of being thrown under the bus? I guess he hasn’t been paying attention to how Chicago Machine thuggery works.

Leave a Reply