A solution for Charlie Rangel’s “trauma”

Posted by: ST on July 26, 2010 at 6:36 pm

Awww:

After sounding defiant in his first round with reporters just now, embattled Rep. Charles Rangel sounded sad and seemed downcast and somewhat gaslit as he talked about how “traumatic” he had found the experience.

Asked about sounding confident in advance of Thursday’s hearing, Rangel replied quietly, “I’m not. This is a very traumatic experience for me and for my family and my constituents. I can only hope that … all the facts come out before my primary election, before my general election.”

He added, “At least we’ll know where we’re going, but it’s painful to have to say ‘no comment’ when people are attacking the very reason that you exist.”

He also said something earlier, unprompted, that caught reporters who came to his event in Harlem by surprise — that there are “more alleged violations” that were looked at, apparently beyond what’s been reported that House ethics probers have reviewed.

Rangel told the crowd, which included a group of constituents and students, that he had been asking for two years for House ethics investigators to look into his lack of reported rental income from a Dominican Republic condo, a donor letter for a CUNY center in his name that he wrote on congressional letterhead and his possession of four rent-stabilized apartments.

Well, Rep. Rangel, you could always take a much-needed vacation. After all, these ethics violation investigations (more here) are going to hurt you so bad that, as ST reader and Rangel constituent Leslie has observed, you’ll only get 75% of the vote in your district instead of the 87% you usually do. Man, that’s rough.

Rangel relaxes

Rangel naps at his 'tax-free' Dominican Republic hideaway. Photo via Splash News/Daily Beast

Update: Don Surber has a Rangel parody. Hilarious.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

6 Responses to “A solution for Charlie Rangel’s “trauma””

Comments

  1. Drew says:

    C’mon, now. You know what they say. Give him a fair trial, and then hang him.

  2. Carlos says:

    Rangel should be the poster boy for Pelosi’s “most ethical Congress evuh!”

    He is, indeed, the supreme example of liberal hypocrisy, even more so than Frenchy Kerry and his bathtub boat. Or Algore and his mansions and jets . Or Geithner and his (unpaid) taxes. Or Obama and his transparency. Or…

    If Congress ever did truly investigate and prosecute felonious or unethical misdeeds, I fear there could not be a quorum to run the nation’s business. Which would suit me fine, after the way they’ve shafted the 50% of us who pay taxes.

  3. thomas mc donnell says:

    the man will be in office till the day he dies.

  4. MarkJ says:

    Poor Nancy Pelosi! What is she to do? Charlie Rangel wants to stay…and the GOP doesn’t want him to go. ;)

  5. Jo says:

    Do his con-sti-chueunts even care that he is marinating in untold and hidden wealth? Do they even grasp the concept of illegalities? And will anything other than a reprimand be done? If he were Republican, he’d be buried.

  6. Kate says:

    Sure they do Jo, but none of the rascals want to lose their opportunity to do the same!