#StuckOnStupid: Concealed carry permit segregation at some Colorado universities

Posted by: ST on August 18, 2012 at 12:14 pm

Are you kidding me?

The University of Colorado at Boulder and the University of Colorado at Colorado Springs are amending their student housing contracts, segregating students who possess a valid concealed-weapons carry permit.

The university said Thursday that both campuses will establish a residential area for students over the age of 21 with permits. In all other dormitories, guns will be banned, the new policy states.

“The main dorms on the main campus will not allow any concealed-carry weapons,” CU-Boulder spokesman Bronson Hilliard said.

In addition, attendees at ticketed athletic and cultural events, such as football games and theater, on both campuses will not be permitted to bring their guns, officials said.

“We are treating that ticket purchase as a contractual agreement that you won’t bring your weapon to the venue,” Hilliard said.

Less than 1 percent of the student-body population of each campus is believed to have a concealed-carry permit, school officials said.

The university has been working on the policy since March, when the Colorado Supreme Court upheld an appeals-court ruling that struck down CU’s gun ban. The court said the Board of Regents overstepped its authority by refusing to allow permitted concealed weapons on campuses, in leased buildings and in any area under the control of university police, officials said.

The Mountain States Legal Foundation is reviewing the CU change:

The new rules announced Thursday are troubling to James Manley, the attorney from the Mountain States Legal Foundation, who represented the student gun-rights group that brought the original lawsuit against CU’s gun ban.

“We’re going to take a hard look at the language, and if it conflicts with the concealed-carry act ruling of the Supreme Court, all options are open to us, including continuing the litigation that CU lost in March,” Manley said.

State law allows for those who are 21 or older, and who possess a concealed-carry permit, to carry a gun on campus.

Deb Coffin, vice chancellor for student affairs, met with student veterans, undergraduates, graduates and the CU Parents Association before developing the new contract agreement for university housing.

There are a dozen university-owned, standalone family housing cottages that will allow for students with concealed weapons permits to keep guns in their residences. Additionally, there are a limited number of units in Athens North, a family housing unit, that will allow for students with permits to bring their guns.

Students in these family housing units must sign contracts stating that they will lock their guns in safes when they leave their cottages or apartments, Coffin said.

“Our primary concern is the safety of our student residents,” Coffin said.

What utter crap!  Basically what this is saying is that no one who legally owns a firearm can be trusted – and why? Because of isolated instances where people who purchased firearms legally carried out attacks with tragic consequences?  Guess what? Most people who own guns legally do NOT commit crimes of any sort and only purchase the firearms either for hunting purposes and/or to protect themselves and their property from people who have a complete disregard for the law.   Don’t believe the agenda-driven scare tactics of the mainstream media and gun control zealots.  The vast majority of people who own firearms are the most responsible people you will ever come across when it comes to knowing how to use one and when to use one.

Consider the policy change and why CU enacted it: In a nutshell, they think gunowners are a danger to society because a tiny minority of them have chosen to use their weapons to hurt and kill innocent people, as was the case in Aurora.   So in response, they want to “segregate” law abiding citizens who legally own a firearm away from other students, for the “protection” of the students who are not gun owners.  Guess what? In terms of the actual crime rate, a disproportionate number of crimes are committed nationwide by young black men.  Would CU respond accordingly, then, by segregating the white students from the black students  in order to “protect” white students? Of course  not.  Not only is it against the law, but it would unfairly stigmatize all black people.   So why do they think it’s ok to do the same thing as it relates to law-abiding gun owners on their campus who haven’t done anything at all to deserve a similar stigmatization?

Not only that, but do we really need to revisit the fact that the theater where the Aurora tragedy took place did NOT allow anyone to carry a gun inside the building, their version of “gun control”? How did that work out for them?  Also, Washington, DC is the gun control capital of America but it did not keep one nut from trying to exact political “revenge” at FRC this past week.

This type of stuff is infuriating to me and I don’t even own a gun nor do I plan to. I can only imagine how infuriated CCW holders feel when they read stuff like this.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Trackbacks

  • Rhymes With Right trackbacked with A Study In Irony...
  • 14 Responses to “#StuckOnStupid: Concealed carry permit segregation at some Colorado universities”

    Comments

    1. Phineas says:

      They’re advertising to every villain with a gun that those other dorms are “easy pickings.” Real smart.

    2. Jgriff says:

      For those without a concealed carry permit, they might want to ask if there are any extra rooms in the concealed carry dorm.

    3. foxmuldar says:

      Really smart idea. Now if a nut wants to walk into a campus and shoot up the place, he will certainly pick the no guns allowed campus. I only hope he picks the place where the idiots that make these silly rules are to be found.

    4. Drew the Infidel says:

      Advertisng the location of “soft targets” has been shown to be one notch below insanity. If the lefties in the media would bother to take a concealed carry class three things may happen: 1) they could not pass the background check required 2) they would know more than they obviously don’t now, and 3) maybe they will STFU. For what it is worth, the ’07 Virginia Tech incident was my main motivation to obtain a license. If a person cannot sit safely in a college classroom, something is dreadfully wrong with our present society. Gun control works; ask the experts like China, Russia, and Nazi Germany.

    5. Great White Rat says:

      Does anyone know if Colorado (and other states with CCW laws) require showing a photo ID before issuing the CCW permit?

      Becuase if they do, then RAAAAAACIST!!!

      The leftists have been screaming that you shouldn’t have to show an ID to vote because it’s a right….well, OK, then so is firearms ownership (for any liberals who read this, it’s called the Second Amendment to the US Constitution. Really. It’s in there. Look it up).

      So, logically, if any attempt to verify ID before someone can vote is a hatefulbigotedracistconservativeteaparty scheme, then attempting to verify ID before issuing a CCW permit is too, right? So how come we don’t see the leftists out in the streets screaming about our rights in those cases?

    6. Carlos says:

      Not only is it an extremely small percentage of gun owners that go wild with their guns, in the vast majority of cases the wilder is either a socialist (like the FRC shooter), socialist-leaning (like the Virginia shooter), of a particular religious persuasion related to the “religion of peace” (think Fort Hood), or just plain apolitical (ask Gabby Giffords).

      So tell me, libs, would you rather deal with those nuts or go to class securely knowing some responsible person has your back?

    7. More than anything else this is a feeble attempt by CU to distract from the fact their Psychiatry Department failed to alert authorities about the foreboding notes Hughes sent to a faculty member. This is commonly called “whistling past the graveyard” since they are well aware this case will not end well for them.

    8. Correction: the movie theater shooter is named Holmes, not Hughes.

    9. Tory II, Illinois says:

      Cho was not allowed to bring a gun on campus, and he certainly wasn’t allowed to shoot anyone.

      If laws or rules are so effective, why have police ?

    10. Carlos says:

      @Tory II: Because there will always be liberals?

    11. jack says:

      If you have any questions regarding the CWP law or training contact http://www.e2c.us or 1-866-371-6111 and the Instructors at Equip 2 Conceal will be happy to help you.

    12. Jay Stevens says:

      @GWR:

      “So how come …?”
      Because consistency has never been a lib strong point.

    13. What is wrong with these people? They’re pointing out to the criminals which dorms are safe and which ones are not because the students are armed.