What the Van Jones pick tells us about Obama

Nail, meet sledgehammer (via ST reader Cump).

6 Responses to "What the Van Jones pick tells us about Obama"

Elektra says:

September 15, 2009 at 1:26 am

NO doubt! *Ping

(he has appointed over 30 czars with whom he meets regularly, but he has held just one cabinet meeting since his inauguration).

That’s an interesting tidbit I will be repeating!
camojack says:

September 15, 2009 at 3:47 am

The Van Jones pick is pretty consistent with the rest of Obama’s choices.

Too bad so many Americans were so incredibly stupid as to vote him in to begin with.
Tom TB says:

September 15, 2009 at 9:16 am

It seems to me Barry Obama will give up anyone that becomes a liability to him, except his own partner in crime (wife), and his daughters. He is not loyal to the United States of America, and has always associated with people that want to break us up.
Brontefan says:

September 15, 2009 at 10:06 am

Anyone who took the time to read the books, Obama Nation and The Case Against Barack Obama: The Unlikely Rise and Unexamined Agenda of the Media’s Favorite Candidate would know that OB is an anti-American Marxist. Look at who he surrounds himself with—former terrorists, anti-American ministers, people who want to alter this country completely and use Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals as their Bible. ACORN and SEIU are perfect examples and the corruption is everywhere: Geitner, Dashle, etc. And OB was careful to make sure if you disagreed with him & his radical transformation plans—you were racist. This label which is still being used demonstrates how he got into office and how he will proceed. After 8 years of horrible name-calling and dissent over George Bush—NOW they are offended by anyone not thrilled with Marxism and ObamaCare?? Jones, I fear, is merely the tip of the iceburg!!
Steve Skubinna says:

September 15, 2009 at 10:39 am

I thought it was amusing, all the puzzled head scratching about how Van Jones could have slipped past the vetting process. He wasn’t vetted, for the basic reason that you don’t need to vet somebody about whom you already know all there is to know. He wasn’t some stealthy pig in a poke the administration casually and carelessly let in, they recruited for him because they knew his resume and he was precisely what they wanted.

Damn right he “fit in,” for the same reason Obama “fit in” with Ayers and Wright a Pfleger and Rezko and the rest of the odious associates of his unsavory past. Only a fool would lie down with pigs and them complain he got dirty.
Carlos says:

September 15, 2009 at 3:11 pm

What did that pick tell us about Obama? It tells us our glorious leader is so arrogant he believes anything he does will be fine with the country he’s trying desperately to destroy. It tells us he’s willing to go to great lengths to avoid having his closest advisors vetted by the Congress. And it tells us he’s going to pick people in the future that have similar ideologies, but without the paper/video trails as obvious.

Comments are closed.