Why on Earth are we selling spare aircraft parts to Iran?
**Posted by Phineas
This is an unbelievably stupid decision. I’ll let my friend Michael Ledeen explain why:
Somebody on Twitter posted an upbeat message saying the US delegation to the latest round of talks with Iranian officials was quite optimistic. Donβt get me wrong, Iβm a born optimist and I love optimism, but Iβd rather revel in victory than hope for good news, and the Iranians have every reason to revel. The Obama crowd has just okβd something the Tehran tyrants have desperately wanted since the eighties: spare parts for their long-grounded American passenger aircraft. Boeing and General Electric were given export licenses by the Treasury Department and everyone involved has been chanting βwe take aircraft security very seriously,β in order to cloak this latest gift to the Khamenei-Rouhani regime in humanitarian hues.
Frankly Iβd rather they took national security very seriously. Iran uses its commercial aircraft for military purposes (one of the reasons that eery flight between Tehran and Caracas is so worrisome), and the mullahs have been limited by the degradation of the national fleet. The Boeing planes and GE engines date to the 1970s, and very few of them are in service. Back in the mid-eighties, when I spent quite a bit of time with Iranian officials, they repeatedly asked for spare parts, both for the passenger planes and for the aging military craft, the F4s and F5s. Secretary of Defense Weinberger of course vetoed any such discussions, and the embargo has held until just now.
Now weβre arming Iran.
Emphases added.
The idea that a state-sponsor of global terrorism like Iran would adhere to understandingsΒ to keep the civilian and military functions of their aircraft separate is self-delusional nonsense. They’ll no more do that than they have to keep their civilian and military nuclear programs apart. (Really, I have a bridge for anyone who believes they’re honoring the recent nuclear agreement.)
What these fatuous dunderheads at State and in the White House refuse to see is that Iran has regarded itself as being at war with the United States since 1979. A deal like this, when Iran could easily ferry troops or equipment on “civilian” flights is tantamount to selling them the rope they’ll use to hang us.
This is part of a larger, global war of tyrannies against democracies. George W. Bush was mocked for his “Axis of Evil” comment, but he was right. The players have changed a bit since then, but still include Pyongyang, Moscow, Beijing, Havana, Caracas — and Tehran. And they’re taking advantage of the openings we’re giving them. More Michael:
And so it is, indeed the war has been on for some time, and itβs a bit hotter than Cold War 1.0 was for most of the twentieth century.Β Kiev burned, and may burn again soon.Β Caracas is burning, as are many of Venezuelaβs cities and towns.Β Crimea has been annexed, and Syria is still aflame, as is Iraq, and also Yemen.Β Estonia and Finland are seriously frightened, as well they should be.Β If we pull back from the crisisΒ du jour, we can see itβs a global conflict.Β Iran and Russia are fighting in Syria, sometimes with and sometimes against the jihadi marauders.Β Cuba is fighting in Venezuela,Β a country the Castros largely command, and Hezbollah is in there, too.Β And for those of you who follow Africa, know that the Iranians are up to their necks in Nigeria, buying influence and supporting the mass murderers in Boko Haram.
The West needs to wake up and smell the smoke from the fires starting to burn all around it, before it turns into a real conflagration. Our foes are vulnerable, and the West can win, but only if with American leadership. The US government is the only one that can convince the other nations to take the steps necessary to push back against Putin, Khamenei, and the others. As John Schindler recently wrote:
We will have many allies in resisting Russian aggression if we focus on issues of freedom and sovereignty, standing up for the rights of smaller countries to choose their own destiny.
It would help if we had leaders who saw themselves as the heirs to Churchill, rather than Chamberlain.
(Crossposted at Public Secrets)