… considering all the setbacks this week that have happened in the war on terror, thanks to the liberal media, former admin and intelligence agency employees with an axes to grind against the President, and politicians on both sides of the aisle (including the President) who seem to believe that being politically correct on the issue of the ‘torture law’ (as well as the Patriot Act) trumps our national security. A recap:
Earlier today, I rec’d several consecutive emails from an anti-war group which I obviously did not sign up for. I emailed the person who sent them emails and asked them to please take me off their email list. This is the response I rec’d back:
IOW, an endorsement of an official ‘non-position’ on Iraq going into the 2006 elections:
I wanted to blog a bit this morning about the President’s reversal in position on Sen. John McCain’s call for a law banning ‘torture’ to foreign suspects in the war on terror but John Hawkins’ post on the subject pretty much sums up my feelings on this switch in position by the President. John writes:
I’d like to say “thanks” to everyone who voted for me in the Weblogs Awards Best of the Top 251-500 blogs category – I came in 7th out of 15 with 370 votes. The winner of that category was a blog called Sadly No – 2,239 votes, which if I’m not mistaken had a strong lead throughout the voting process. Congrats to Sadly No!
Here’s a must-read piece from today’s American Thinker that essentially asks what if we fought WWII in 2005?
