Sally Jenkins to NOW ninnies: Stuff it – PLUS: Edwards no longer the darling of “feminist” groups
Sally Jenkins demonstrates how beautiful it is when one liberal feminist takes on another:
Sally Jenkins demonstrates how beautiful it is when one liberal feminist takes on another:
Most of the time, Super Bowl ads are either cute, funny, sexy, over the top, or a combination of the above. Rarely do they preach any particular social awareness message – in fact, in the past oftentimes when advocacy groups have tried to place such ads during the Super Bowl they’ve been shot down by the network airing the SB.
Today is the 37th anniversary of the day the SCOTUS legalized the cruel act of abortion (see the WaPo’s lackluster reporting on today’s March for Life rally in DC here). I’ve written about the issue many times here, and long time readers may remember the piece I wrote three years ago detailing my journey from being pro-abortion to pro-life. It was a “trip” well-worth taking and one that, at the end of it, I swore to commit my life to help undo the damage I, as a former abortion supporter, indirectly helped inflict on innocent unborn children via my role as an advocate for “choice.”
Another day, another clueless Hollywood “feminist” gets involved in the abortion debate:
A couple of days ago, pro-life blogger Jill Stanek documented three stories, posted at a pro-abortion blog, of women in the comments section who had had abortions for birth control reasons who were completely unashamed of them. If you’ve ever wanted to read a little more in depth as to what a classic narcissistic uber-liberal feminist sounds like, you’ve got it right there. One of them had three abortions. And here it was I thought the left was, courtesy of their precious sex education classes in junior and senior high school, so much more educated than us backwater conservatives about the dangers of having unprotected sex to the point that little “accidents” like pregnancy just didn’t happen to them.
David Freddoso reports: