NOW: losing its potency?
Charmaine Yoest points to an article from Friday’s WSJ that indicates a serious decline in support over the last ten years for NOW, and other ‘women’s rights’ groups. From the article:
Charmaine Yoest points to an article from Friday’s WSJ that indicates a serious decline in support over the last ten years for NOW, and other ‘women’s rights’ groups. From the article:
…available November 2, can be pre-ordered here.
He’s been on hiatus from writing columns for four years now, but he’s back and slams Senator Frist’s pro-federal funding for stem-cell research stance:
God bless the tiny little baby and her family, who not only are saying "hello" to baby Susan but goodbye to mother Susan. Story:
Remember the NARAL Screw Abstinence Party? To give you a refresher, here was NARAL’s statement on the "party" (back from 7/14/2005):
First, my thoughts on gay marriage, for those who are new to the ST blog. The definition of marriage has been defined throughout the ages as a union between a man and a woman. Whether over the centuries men were marrying little girls, or at the times when it was only whites who could get married, even then it was still man and woman. The man/woman criteria has been one that has *not* changed, until recently (thanks to the Massachusetts SC).