Saddam’s Philippines terror connection

Posted by: Sister Toldjah on March 18, 2006 at 11:13 pm

Via Stephen Hayes:

SADDAM HUSSEIN’S REGIME PROVIDED FINANCIAL support to Abu Sayyaf, the al Qaeda-linked jihadist group founded by Osama bin Laden’s brother-in-law in the Philippines in the late 1990s, according to documents captured in postwar Iraq. An eight-page fax dated June 6, 2001, and sent from the Iraqi ambassador in Manila to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Baghdad, provides an update on Abu Sayyaf kidnappings and indicates that the Iraqi regime was providing the group with money to purchase weapons. The Iraqi regime suspended its support–temporarily, it seems–after high-profile kidnappings, including of Americans, focused international attention on the terrorist group.

The fax comes from the vast collection of documents recovered in postwar Afghanistan and Iraq. Up to this point, those materials have been kept from the American public. Now the proverbial dam has broken. On March 16, the U.S. government posted on the web 9 documents captured in Iraq, as well as 28 al Qaeda documents that had been released in February. Earlier last week, Foreign Affairs magazine published a lengthy article based on a review of 700 Iraqi documents by analysts with the Institute for Defense Analysis and the Joint Forces Command in Norfolk, Virginia. Plans for the release of many more documents have been announced. And if the contents of the recently released materials and other documents obtained by The Weekly Standard are any indication, the discussion of the threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s Iraq is about to get more interesting.

Several months ago, The Weekly Standard received a set of English-language
documents from a senior U.S. government official. The official represented this material as U.S. government translations of three captured Iraqi documents. According to this source, the documents had been examined by the U.S. intelligence community and judged “consistent with authentic documents”–the professionals’ way of saying that these items cannot definitively be certified but seem to be the real thing.

The Weekly Standard checked its English-language documents with officials serving elsewhere in the federal government to make sure they were consistent with the versions these officials had seen. With what one person characterized as “minor discrepancies,” they are. One of the three documents has been posted in the original Arabic on the website of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. A subsequent translation of that document is nearly identical to the English-language text that we were given.

These documents add to the growing body of evidence confirming the Iraqi regime’s longtime support for terrorism abroad. The first of them, a series of memos from the spring of 2001, shows that the Iraqi Intelligence Service funded Abu Sayyaf, despite the reservations of some IIS officials. The second, an internal Iraqi Intelligence memo on the relationships between the IIS and Saudi opposition groups, records that Osama bin Laden requested Iraqi cooperation on terrorism and propaganda and that in January 1997 the Iraqi regime was eager to continue its relationship with bin Laden. The third, a September 15, 2001, report from an Iraqi Intelligence source in Afghanistan, contains speculation about the relationship between Iraq and al Qaeda and the likely U.S. response to it.

Read the whole thing.

The recently released documents can be viewed here.

Read more via: Captain Ed – who has a must read post with some addition information on Iraq/OBL connections, Andy McCarthy at NRO’s “The Corner”, Hugh Hewitt, Macsmind, AJ Strata, All Things Beautiful, Wizbang, Gina Cobb

Related Toldjah So posts:

RSS feed for comments on this post.

9 Responses to “Saddam’s Philippines terror connection”

Comments

  1. steve says:

    “The enemy of my enemy, is my friend”, and it was unnecessary and stupid to illegally and preemptively invade Iraq, as bush did. Peace

  2. - Hmmmm….since you seem to be “the friend of all of America’s enemies”, what would that make you Steve-oh?

    - From your own definition I would take that to mean your the sworn enemy of America….

    - Bang’s fangs

  3. steve says:

    My enemy is war and yours seems to be Peace. I’ll defend my position, how about you. Peace

  4. forest hunter says:

    Steve-How would you defend peace? Legally speaking of course…….

  5. Lorica says:

    Yes Steve do tell how would you defend peace?? – Lorica

  6. forest hunter says:

    The same way Carter defended the captors for 444 daze, Lorica. :-w

  7. steve says:

    None of those people died. Not one. That is how you maintain Peace. The United States should immediately reestablish full diplomatic relations with Iran and strip Israel of it’s nuclear weapons. Peace

  8. Lorica says:

    You were right Forest. It is surrender to radical Islam. Thanks but no thanks Steve that is a very stupid plan. – Lorica

  9. steve says:

    Radical Islam can only be defeated by moderate Islam, not by American bombs and bullets. Peace