Media critic. Invader of
SJW safe spaces.
You have three houses. One of them a beach house. How many do you need? twitter.com/berniesanders/…
New end tables from athomestores. Score! 😀 instagram.com/p/BTMt9K1lsZf/
Good morning! All is well and baby continues to gain! Here we have a cute shot from yesterday, just mom and baby en… twitter.com/i/web/status/8…
Giraffe Cam will go dark Friday (4/21) @ 4:30pm Eastern. We will all be there to say goodbye. Thank you all for joi… twitter.com/i/web/status/8…
That is, if you believe the unrestrained male-hating rants of uberfeminist Cheryl Lindsey Seelhoff (direct link here), who blames male “heterosupremacy” and the controversial song “Hadji Girl” for the rape and brutal murder of 14 year old Abeer Qasim Hamza al-Janabi. It should be noted that one soldier has already come forth as being a witness to this crime. It should also be noted that yours truly, as would any decent American, strongly condemns the actions of the troops in question (assuming what the witness is saying is true, and unlike Haditha, this looks like a sure case of guilt).
Here’s how Seelhoff starts off:
A couple of weeks ago there was a highly-publicized controversy over a video which appeared on UTube of a U.S. Marine performing a song entitled Hadji Girl. The song had been performed before thousands of U.S. troops in Iraq who could be heard wildly cheering and laughing in the background.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations condemned the song and performance, as did the Marine Corps, announcing an intention to investigate, and the guy who wrote it and performed it apologized. And “explained.” See, he said, and his defenders said, and the defenders of all the wildly screaming and laughing troops in the audience said, and Michelle Malkin said, it wasn’t really about Marines killing civilians, no, no, it was about “insurgents” tricking Marines, using beautiful girls to lure them into traps and ambushes. But the Marines in the song outwitted them by making sure the blood spurted from between the decoy’s eyes instead of theirs! Don’t you get the humor? It was a joke! I mean, the chorus of the song came from a movie made by the creators of South Park. You people have no sense of humor.
Malkin, who – among others, asserted that the song was about a beautiful girl leading a soldier to an “insurgent” ambush, was 100% correct.
It is so transparent. It is so obvious.
Abeer Qasim Hamza made the fatal errror of refusing the “advances” of Marines. She had to have known, said they, that she was hot. She had to have known, said they, what she was doing, sashaying through that checkpoint every day. And she turned them down. Ignored them. Rejected them. Acted like she was scared. Who the hell did she think she was? What. They were there all the way from the United States to defend her and her family, and she thought she could get away with that kind of bullshit?
After they raped her and killed her family, they blamed it on “insurgents.” And in their minds, that wasn’t really a lie. In fact, to men under male heterosupremacy, beautiful women who refuse their advances are always “insurgents.” They are deceivers, evil vixens, jezebels, dangerous, and deadly, decoys scheming to lure them into traps. They deserve to be raped. They deserve to die.
As Allah notes in the comment he inserted in the midst of quoting Seelhoff’s opinion piece at the Hot Air blog, as far as it is known, none of the suspects who’ve been charged have made any official public statements about the incident. As far as we know, the troops in question merely saw the opportunity to take advantage of a young woman alone – we know nothing beyond that point (outside of the horrible outcome, in which al-Janabi and her family were murdered). Seelhoff is engaging in a massive amount of conjecturing above (and below, as you’ll soon see). This is by no means a defense or excuse for the heinous actions of those charged, but instead a pointing-to- of the larger ‘point’ that Seelhoff is trying to make here beyond the actions of a few troops who do not represent the vast majority of fine men who serve our military with honor and great distinction.
More (emphasis added):
I’m not surprised by this; it makes perfect sense to me. It will make perfect sense to any honest and clear-thinking woman who has experienced this same murderous hatred at the hands of a man she has spurned or ignored (something most women have experienced sometime or other.) I don’t think any of the men who did this were personality-disordered. I think they were men under male heterosupremacy who had the opportunity of a lifetime: the opportunity to get away with raping and killing and getting revenge against a beautiful young girl who had rejected them.
In other words, what she’s saying is that these men were just being, well, males and they were doing ‘what males do’: rape women who either can’t defend themselves or have no one around who can help them do so.
What disturbs me, and scares me, are all the Americans, including women, who defended this song, defended this performance, and bought the public explanations – thousands and thousands of them. All the Americans who thought this song was funny.
What disturbs me and scares me are all the Americans who will suggest this is some anomaly, who will chalk this atrocity up to “personality disorders.” All of male heterosupremacy is personality disordered. It is soul sick with a sickness unto death. These young men just danced what was choreographed for them.
Got it? The rant is not just against males, it’s a rant against their heterosupremacy. If you look up heterosupremacy on Google, you’ll find that, in the gay community, the predominant definition for heterosupremacy is similar to what you’d find for white supremacy – namely, that heterosupremacists, like white supremacists, feel they are superior to the gay and lesbian community and strive to ignore their very existence. I’m guessing from reading this opinion piece that Seelhoff is a lesbian who hates straight men, because of her liberal use of the word “heterosupremacy” to describe men. To man-haters like Seelhoff, being born a male is bad enough, but being a straight male is even worse – it means, to her, that you males out there have some type of sick supremacist personality ingrained into you that means you are destined one day to commit a horrible crime against a woman – just because you ‘can.’
Memo to Seelhoff: While you’re busy in the coming days, weeks, months, and years counting the many ways that male “heterosupremacy” is supposedly a “personality disordered” [sic](something you, BTW, contradicted yourself on in your opinion piece – read it again carefully and you should be able to see it even through your mindless hate), keep in mind that the truly evil men in the world are far outnumbered by those who willingly put themselves on the line for you everyday: policemen, firemen, the military- men who are the fathers, brothers, nephews, cousins, friends: the protectors of all women – even women like you who would just as soon spit on them as to look at them. You’re alive and free today because honorable decent men generations past and present took a bullet (or voluntarily risked taking one) so you’d have the right to express your warped opinions. Think about it.